Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 15
Pack. No
Link Name
Project Implementation Plan March 2013
DED Status
Type of Design
Length km
19 Lais
Bintunan Full Engineering Design DED
11.6 REVIEW
BINTEK 20
LubukAlung - Sicincin Full Engineering Design DED
14.6 X
21 LubukAlung - Kurataji
Full Engineering Design DED 16.8
X TOTAL
575.3
The DSC shall carry out all the activities necessary for engineering survey, detailed design study, design validation and updating including preparation of drawings,
prequalification and bidding documents and estimated construction cost for all roads and bridges works for WP-2 and WP-3. However, in parallel with instruction from DGH
encouraging P2JNBBPJN to carry out the Detailed Engineering Design DED until DSC is established.
The CTC will then conduct necessary check and review on completed Detailed Engineering Design DED prepared by the DSC with steps as shown in Figure 4.2
below.
Figure 4.2 Process of Check and Review on Completed DED
Considering the WINRIP procurement plan, the Highway Engineer has started Technical Design Review in advance. Package No.5 Sp.Rampa – Poriaha is reviewing. The Senior
Highway Engineer will be mobilized on 1 February on schedule.
Progress of Technical Design Reviewing up to the end of January 2013 is included as Appendix B.
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 16
4.2 Procurements
Procurement shall be conducted under the Bank’s Procurement Procedures as mentioned in the Loan Agreement. The International Competitive Bidding ICB will apply
to the packages with the construction estimated cost more than US 10 Million to comply with the Bank’s threshold for ICB. According to the GOI regulation, a prequalification shall
be applied for the packages with the construction estimated cost more than IDR 10 Billion.
Therefore, all subprojects for WP-1 have been started with prequalification since 30 December 2011 for ICB multiple contract. This was an advanced procurement action
agreed by both DGH and the World Bank prior to the CTC establishment. The deadline of Qualification Document submission by the Applicants was on 28 February 2012. There
are twenty nine 29 Applicants who submitted and applied their qualification documents for various packages which are summarized as follow.
• Package No. 1 Krui – Biha
: 13 Applicants applied. •
Package No. 2 Pd. Sawah – Sp. Empat : 13 Applicants applied. •
Package No. 3 Manggopoh – Pd. Sawah : 18 Applicants applied. •
Package No. 4 Ipuh – Bantal : 12 Applicants applied.
No Singles JO Legal Name
Participate and Result of the PQ Package
No.1 Package
No.2 Package
No.3 Package
No.4
1 PT. Adhi Karya Persero, Tbk.
Applied NA
NA Applied
2 PT. Adhi Karya - PT. Angkasapuri Konsursindo, JO.
NA Applied
Applied NA
3 PT. Bangun Cipta Konstruksi - PT. Amarta Karya Persero, JO.
Applied NA
NA NA
4 PT. Brantas Abipraya Persero
Applied NA
Applied NA
5 PT. Citra Gading Asritama
NA NA
NA Applied
6 PT. Conbloc Infratecno
Applied NA
Applied NA
7 PT. Duta Graha Indah, Tbk.
Applied Applied
Applied NA
8 PT. Hutama Karya Persero
NA Applied
Applied NA
9 PT. Hutama Karya Persero - PT. Suci Karya Bad inusa, JO.
Applied NA
NA Applied
10 PT. Jaya Konstruksi MP, Tbk. Applied
Applied Applied
Appli ed 11 Kuk Dong Eng. Corp. - PT. Duta Graha Indah, Tbk., JO.
NA NA
NA Applied
12 PT. Multi Structure Applied
Applied Applied
Applied 13 PT. Nindya Karya Persero
NA Appli ed
Applied Appli ed
14 PT. Nindya Karya Persero - PT. Rindang Tigasatu Pratama, JO. Applied
NA NA
NA 15 Pan Asia Corp. - PT. Anugerah Karya Agra Sentosa, JO.
Applied NA
Applied Appli ed
16 PT. PP Persero, Tbk. NA
Applied Applied
NA 17 PT. PP Persero Tbk - PT. Tri Citra Perdana JO.
Applied NA
NA Applied
18 PT. Waskita Karya Persero NA
Applied Applied
NA 19 PT. Waskita Karya Persero - PT. Angkasa Puri Konsursindo, JO.
Applied NA
NA NA
20 PT. Waskita Karya Persero - PT. Daya Mulia Turangga, JO. NA
NA NA
Applied 21 PT. Wijaya Karya – PT. Lubuk Minturun Karya Persada, JO.
NA Applied
Applied Applied
22 PT. Yasa Patria Perkasa NA
NA Applied
NA 23 PT. Angkasa Teknik Raya
NA Applied
Applied NA
24 PT. Bangun Cipta - Barettamuda KSO. NA
NA Applied
NA 25 PT. Bumi Rejo
Applied NA
NA Applied
26 PT. Cipta Karya Prima Mandiri NA
Applied Applied
NA 27 PT. Sumber Batu
NA Applied
NA NA
28 Synohidro Co. Ltd. NA
Applied Applied
NA 29 PT. Telaga Megabuana - PT. Mawatindo Road Construction, JO
NA NA
Applied NA
No. Of applicants submitted the document 13
13 18
12
•
Note : NA = Not Applied for Prequalification
.
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 17
All three 3 Procurement Teams or Pokja evaluated all qualification documents submitted by those Applicants. Submission of the Application Evaluation Report AER to
the Bank was on 9 May 2012 for two packages Package No.1 and No.4 and on 20 June 2012 for other two packages Package No.2 and No.3. The Bank still reviews the
AERs and requested the Pokja to submit supporting documents. The latest request from the Bank was for company statutes information of the Government’s Entity participated in
the prequalification. DGH sent the required documents to the Bank on 15 January 2013.
DGH has also completed the draft of consolidated multiple contract ICB Standard Bidding Document for four 4 packages under AWP-1. The draft had been submitted to
the Bank on 8 March 2012. The Bank’s comments had been issued on 12 March 2012. The draft of consolidated SBD was revised by DGH accommodating the Bank’s
comments and submitted to the Banks on 27 June 2012. Second revision of the draft consolidated SBD, as requested by the Bank regarding synchronization between
drawings and Bill of Quantities by letter dated 1 August 2012, was then finally concurred by the Bank on 31 October 2012.
The WINRIP Procurement Plan is shown in Appendix D. 4.3 Civil Works Implementation
Until the end of January 2013, there was no subproject contracted.
4.4 Civil Works Progress
No civil works progress can be reported since there was no subproject contracted until the end of January 2013.
4.5 Quality Assurance
The DSC will be responsible for quality assurance of materials and workmanship, certifying whether or not contractors have achieved the required results, as well as
documentation and reporting based on the financial management plan. They will prepare a Quality Assurance system covering all subprojects, and continuously monitor the
effectiveness of their supervision procedures.
The CTC will give guidance to them preparing quality assurance system including standard operation procedures for all work items under the contract based on contract
specification. He will also be responsible to conduct regular monitoring on the quality assurance for all civil works implementation. A Quality Assurance Engineer of the CTC is
planned to be in charged prior to contract signing of the civil works.
4.6 Environmental and Social Considerations 4.6.1 Current Overall Situation
A project category is assigned to each package as either Category A, B or C depending on the likely degree of influence on environmental issues with a
brief explanation as follows.
Category A project is one which will have a significant negative impact on the environment and may have an influence on areas outside the actual project area.
A project classified as such requires an AMDAL ANDAL, RKLRPL study.
