THE 3
INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON PE, SPORT HEALTH 2013
Sport Science Faculty, Semarang State University - Gd F1 Kampus Sekaran Gunungpati Semarang, Indonesia 50229 Phonefax: +6224-858007
Page 296
A
1
= Flexibility PNF X = mean
A
2
= Flexibility Static-passive
SD = Standard Deviation B
1
= High reaction speed B
2
= Low reaction speed Table 3. Normality test of each treatment group to receive a service
No. Kelompok
N L
o
L
t
Kesimpulan
1 .
A
1
20 ,130
0,19 Normal
2 .
A
2
20 ,153
0,19 Normal
3 .
B
1
20 ,106
0,19 Normal
4 .
B
2
20 ,116
0,19 Normal
5 .
A
1
B
1
10 ,152
0,25 8
Normal 6
. A
1
B
2
10 ,117
0,25 8
Normal 7
. A
2
B
1
10 ,119
0,25 8
Normal 8
. A
2
B
2
10 ,147
0,25 8
Normal
Table 4. Variant Factorial Analysis
Variant Dk
JK RJK
F
hitung
F
tabel
Simpulan
Effect of Flexibility A 1
52.900 52.900
12.276 4.149
Significant Effect of Reaction speed
B 1
136.900 136.900
31.768 4.149
Significant Interaction AxB
1 0.100
0.100 0.023
4.149 Non
Significant Error
32 137.900
4.309 Total
39 465.900
Note: A = Flexibility
B = reaction speed Value F
table
at significance level α = 0.05.
1. Different effect of PNF flexibility exercise and static-passive to receive a service in
takraw game μ A1: A2 μ
Variant factorial analysis used to test the hypothesis: different effect of PNF
flexibility exercises and static-passive to receive a service in takraw game with
THE 3
INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON PE, SPORT HEALTH 2013
Sport Science Faculty, Semarang State University - Gd F1 Kampus Sekaran Gunungpati Semarang, Indonesia 50229 Phonefax: +6224-858007
Page 297
significance level α = 0.05, critical value of
F
table
with freedom degrees dk 1 and 32 = 4,149 . Calculation results in Table 4, the
value of F
count
is12.276. F
count
is higher than F
table
F
count
= 12.276 F = 4.149, it means that H
is rejected and H
1
is accepted. Otherwise the second hypothesis that there is
a difference between the effect of PNF flexibility exercises and static -passive to
receive a service in takraw game is accepted .
Based on the results of variant analysis, the conclusion says that there are
significant differences between PNF flexibility exercises and static-passive to receive a
service in takraw game. Furthermore q
count
= 4.955 compared with critical value of q
table
at significance level α = 0.05 with degrees of
freedom df = 2.32, it’s obtained q
table
= 2.884. It shows that q
count
= 4.955 q
tabel
= 2.884. It means H
is rejected and H
1
is accepted. The conclusion is PNF flexibility
exercises are more effective than static- passive exercises
2. Different effect of high-speed reaction and low speed reaction to receive a
service in takraw game μB1: μB2
Variant factorial analysis used to examine the hypothesis of different effect of
high speed reaction and low speed rection to receive a service in takraw game with the
significance level α = 0.05, critical value F
table
with degrees of freedom df 1 and 32 is 4.149. F
count
is 31.768. F
count
is higher than F
table
F
count
= 31.678 F
table
= 4.149. It means that H
is rejected and H
1
is accepted. Otherwise it says that the third hypothesis,
there is a difference between the effect of high speed reaction and low speed reaction
to receive a service in takraw game. Based on the results of variant
analysis, there are significant difference between athletes having high speed reaction
and low speed reaction to receive a service in takraw
game. q
count
= 7.971 and critical value q
tabel
with significant level
α = 0.05 with degrees of freedom df = 2.32 is 2,884. The result
shows q
count
= 7.971 q
tabel
= 2.884. It means that H
is rejected and H
1
is accepted. Athlete having high speed reaction receive well a
service than athlete having low speed reaction.
3. Interactions of flexibility exercise and speed reaction to receive a service in
