Building into apk.file

140 any meaning followed to explain it. However, the second expert explained that if the focus was only on how to pronounce it, it would not matter. It is the same with the picture in pronunciation part for “GP” the picture did not really represent the doctor since the doctor was with a young girl. If a person does not know the meaning of GP previously, then it will mislead for himher. However, he further stated that once again it needs to check with the purpose of giving the pronunciation practice, if it is merely for practicing how to say the word then the picture will not affect a lot. “There was a picture of general practitioner which by chance the picture was a doctor and a child, if the purpose is only to give information ... but if the purpose of the picture is to educate, then it was not quite suitable, because it tends to be confusing which one is the GP, the doctor or the little girl”appendix 16Q2V1 Another IT expert also stated that the text in the pronunciation needs to represent its usage which will ease the users to find how to pronounce it using the phonetic symbols, the punctuation or the meaning if heshe does not know the meaning. “Maybe, phonetic symbols need to be added in the pronunciation part, so it’s not only listening what need to is stated but maybe there is punctuation and the information about it, maybe that will be good for learning English. So when he finds words that do not exist there, he can mark the difficulties of the words that he read. appendix 16Q2V2

b. Summative

The summative evaluation was intended for the overall function of the application, the data gained from the expert validation on the learning content and the users’ validation in preliminary study were conducted. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI 141 The first validation was related to the learning content. The questionnaire of expert validation on the learning content is based on the theories of speaking skill, teaching speaking and MALL. The first part is related to speaking skill which comprises two main aspects, fluency and accuracy which propose by Richards 2006. Based on the result of the questionnaire the content of SPINE application has promoted fluency in terms of the items that the learning content has reflected the natural use of language, encouraged the learners to focus on achieving communication, depicted the meaningful use of language, requires the use of communication strategies, encouraged the learners to produce language that may not be predictable and encouraged the learners to seek link of language use to context. Each item was categorised as good, it means that based on the fluency category, the revision for the content of learning was optional. Table 4.16. The result of expert validation on the learning content of speaking aspect fluency CODE STATEMENT N MEAN CATEGORY Valid Missing LC1 The learning content reflects natural use of language. 3 4.3 Good LC2 The learning content encourages the learners to focus on achieving communication. 3 4.7 Good LC3 The learning content depicts the meaningful use of language 3 4.3 Good LC4 The learning content requires the use of communication strategies 3 4.3 Good