Conceptual Framework Theoretical Hypothesis

21 D.The Instrument of the Research The research instruments used by the writer was written test to the second grade of SMA Pembangunan 1Bogor. The test was given twice to the students. The first test was pre-test, and the second was post-test. This test was done to know how well the students master learning reading skill through paraphrasing and summarizing. E.Technique of Data Collection The writer gave two test as a technique of collecting data in this research. The test were pre-test and post-test. The first test was given before teaching and the second test was given after teaching. F.Technique of Data Analysis In analyzing the data from teaching reading skill through paraphrasing and summarizing the writer used the statistical calculation. The writer calculated by using these steps: a. Determining the Mean of Variable X by using formula: Mx = b. Determining the Mean of Variable Y by using formula : My = c. Determining the Standard Deviation Score of Variable X by using formula : SDx = √ d. Determining the Standard Deviation Score of Variable Y by using formula : Sdy = √ 22 e. Determining Standard Error Mean of Variable X by using formula : SE MX = √ f. Determining Standard Error Mean of Variable Y by using formula : SE MY = √ g. Determining the Standard Error of different Mean of Variable X and Mean of Variable Y by using formula: SE MX – SE MY = √ h. Determining t o by using formula: t o = i. Determining the degree of freedom df by using formula: Df = N1 + N2 - 2 G.Statistical Hypothesis Statistically, the hypothesis stated as follows: Ho : µ A = µ B H 1 :µ A µ B The criteria for the hyporhesis testing are: Ho is accepted if t ≤ t 1-α, the t 1- 1 ½ α price is obtained from t distribution table, on the other hand, Ho is rejected on the any other price. 23 CHAPTER IV RESEARCH FINDINGS AND INTERPRETATION

A. The Description of the Data

As mentioned in previous pages, in taking the data the writer conducted both library research and field research. To know the result of the test, the writer observed the class, and taught the student to take students score before the teaching began and after the teaching or in the last meeting of the research. Table 4.1 The score of the experiment class students pre-test and pos-test using paraphrasing and summarizing in teaching reading. Student Pre-Test Post-test Gained Score 1 45 90 33 2 60 70 10 3 55 60 5 4 60 65 5 5 75 95 20 6 65 95 30 7 75 85 -3 8 65 70 5 9 70 80 10 10 60 70 10 11 60 85 20 12 70 75 5 13 75 90 15 14 65 80 15 15 55 80 25 24 16 55 85 5 17 70 95 25 18 60 70 10 19 45 70 25 20 50 75 15 N=20 ∑=1235 Average=61.75 ∑=1565 Average=78.25 ∑=285 Based on the tabel above, the writer concluded that the lowest score of the pre-test is 45 and the highest score of pre-test is 75 with average 61.75. And the lowest score of the post-test is 60, and the higher score of post-test is 95 with average 78.25. Table 4.2 The score of the control class students pre-test and post-test using paraphrasing and summarizing in teaching reading. Student Pre-Test Post-Test Gained Score 1 45 60 15 2 40 60 33 3 60 75 15 4 55 65 10 5 60 75 15 6 60 75 15 7 60 76 16 8 70 65 -5 9 50 80 30 10 66 78 12 11 45 70 25 12 70 65 -5 25 13 65 64 -1 14 72 60 -12 15 70 65 -5 16 40 50 10 17 58 55 -3 18 56 57 1 19 65 70 5 20 60 65 -3 N=20 ∑=1667 Average=58.35 ∑=1330 Average=66.5 ∑=168 Based on the table above, the writer concluded that the lowest score of the pre-tes 40 and the higher score of the pre-test 70 with the average 58.35. The lowest score of post-test is 50 and the higher score of the post-test 80 with the average 66.5.

1. Analysis of the data

The following is the table the result of the data from the score experiment class student and the score of the control class student. Table 4.3 The result calculation of test between experiment class and control class Student X Y x y 1 90 60 -11.75 6.5 138.06 42.25 2 70 60 -8.25 6.5 68.06 42.25 3 60 75 -18.25 -8.5 333.06 72.25 4 65 65 -13.25 1.5 175.56 2.25 5 95 75 -16.75 -8.5 280.56 72.25 26 6 95 75 -16.75 -8.5 280.56 72.25 7 85 76 -6.75 -9.5 45.56 90.25 8 70 65 -8.25 1.5 68.06 2.25 9 80 80 -1.75 -13.5 3.06 182.25 10 70 78 -8.25 -11.5 68.06 132.25 11 85 70 -6.75 -3.5 45.56 12.25 12 75 65 3.25 1.5 10.56 68.06 13 90 64 -11.75 2.5 138.06 6.25 14 80 60 -1.75 6.5 3.06 42.25 15 80 65 -1.75 1.5 3.06 2.25 16 85 50 -6.75 16.5 45.56 272.25 17 95 55 -16.75 11.5 280.56 132.25 18 70 57 -8.25 9.5 68.06 90.25 19 70 70 -825 -3.5 68.06 12.25 20 75 65 3.25 1.5 10.56 2.25 N=20 ∑=1565 Average =78.25 ∑=1330 Average =66.5 ∑=0 ∑=0 ∑=2133.7 ∑=19401.87 Based on the data on the table 4.3, the writer conclude that the statistical calculatioan as follows: M x = = = 78.25

Dokumen yang terkait

An Analysis On High School Students’ Ability To Master Passive Voice A Study Case : The Second Year Students At SMK Negeri 2 Pematangsiantar

1 73 52

TEACHER TALK IN TEACHING SPEAKING ANALYTICAL EXPOSITION TEXT AT THE ELEVENTH GRADE OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL.

1 17 77

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF TASK AND STUDENTS’ RESPONSES AT THE TENTH GRADE OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL IN PRAWIRA The Implementation of Task and Student's Response at The Tenth Grade of Senior High School in Prawira Marta, Kartasura.

0 2 13

THE TEACHING OF READING COMPREHENSION OF ANALYTICAL TEXT BASED ON 2013 CURRICULUM AT 11TH GRADE OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL.

0 2 23

EQUIVALENCE OF THE TEXT AND CONTEXT IN BILINGUAL TEACHING MATERIALS OF GRADE X SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL.

0 1 23

THE USE OF THINK PAIR AND SHARE TECHNIQUE IN TEACHING READING TO THE SEVENTH GRADE OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL

0 0 10

HUMAN REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEM AT SECOND GRADE OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL CLASS XI SCIENCE

0 0 5

Using Blended Learning Model in Teaching Students’ Reading Comprehension of Exposition Text at the Second Grade of Senior High School Yapip Makassar - Repositori UIN Alauddin Makassar

0 1 110

A STUDY ON THE CORRELATION BETWEEN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ ENGLISH NATIONAL EXAMINATION SCORE AND THEIR READING COMPREHENSION AT SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL (A Correlational Research at the First Grade Students of Senior High School 1 Rembang in Academic Year

0 0 14

The effect of teaching reading using jigsaw and Grammar Translation Method (GTM) on the reading comprehension achievement of the second grade of senior high school students - Widya Mandala Catholic University Surabaya Repository

0 0 7