11 know  the  students‟  view  point.  Because  the  purpose  is  to  discover  what
acquaintance to assist students‟ reading performance, therefore, this part becomes the most important thing.
b. Designing the Lesson Plan
The  researcher  starts  with  arranging  the  content  based  on  the  data instruments. As Morrison, Ross, Kalman,  Kemp 2011 state
“a well-designed instructional  strategy  prompts  or  motivates  the  learner  to  actively  make  these
connections  between  wha t  the  learner  already  knows  and  the  new  information”
pp.  150-151.  The  researcher  adapts  Web-based  instruction  as  the  instructional strategy in this research. As Morrison et.al 2011 state about the term Web-based
instruction  will  be  assimilated  into  computer-based  instruction  CBI.  They  also find  that  there  are  three  major  characteristics  of  students  within  the  use  of
computer-based instruction. They are student will work as individual learner, CBI is self-paced instruction for students because they have to click the button in doing
the reading exercises individually, and CBI may modify each student through the responses and feedbacks that the student will receive. The definition of self-paced
is  an  individual  learning  method  which  calls as “individualized learning or self-
instruction” p. 226. The researcher is not only designing the instruction, but also designing  the  syllabus
before  creating  the  students‟  materialsexercises.  The syllabus  design  is  in  accordance  with  the  four  main  competencies  of  curriculum
2013.
12 The four main competencies of curriculum 2013 as in Table 1 below.
Table 1. Main Competence English Language Grade VII Main Competence
1. Respecting and comprehending the teaching of the students‟ religions and beliefs.
2. Respecting and comprehending good attitudes, e.g. honesty, discipline,
responsibility, care tolerant and cooperation, politeness, confidentiality, through an effective interaction with others in society and nature.
3. Understanding the knowledge factual, conceptual, and procedural based on
curiosity about science, technology, art, culture related with phenomena and reality.
4. Trying, exploring, and presenting in a concrete way using, explaining, arranging,
modifying, and creating and in an abstract way writing, reading, counting, drawing, and arranging story appropriate with what is to be learned in school and
another related source which has similar point of viewtheory.
c. Developing the Students’ Reading Exercises
After  designing  the  syllabus,  the  researcher  develops  the  syllabus  into students‟  reading  exercises.  The  researcher  focuses  on  students  reading
comprehension and additional knowledge from the given reading texts. Certainty, the researcher also designs the exercises by arranging the exercises from simple-
to-complex.  According  to  Morrison,  Ross,  Kalman,    Kemp  2011,  the  basic principle of simple-to-complex materials usage is to make the students more relax
with the simple exercise in the first unit. Then, in the next units the students may encounter  the  difficult  one  where  they  have  already  experienced  in  the  previous
unit p. 218. Again, the researcher develops the syllabus into four units exercises. The design can be accessed at www.englishreadex.pbworks.com.
d. Evaluating the Students’ Reading Exercises
In this research, evaluation part is the last component which the purpose is to  estimate  the  design.  Morrison,  Ross,  Kalman,    Kemp  2011  note  that  the
13 purpose
of evaluation is “to make judgments about the worth or success of people or  things  e.g.,  lessons,  programs,  projects  and  to  determine  student  success  in
learning ” p. 272. Again, Morrison Ross, Kalman,  Kemp 2001 inform that
there  are  three  types  of  evaluation.  They  are  formative,  summative  and confirmative evaluations. In evaluating the design, this research adapts formative
evaluation,  because  it  informs  the  instructor  or  planning  team  how  well  the instructional  program  is  serving  the  objectives  as  it  progresses  p.  272.  Where
according  to  Morrison  Ross,  Kalman,    Kemp  2011,  summative  and confirmative description are:
... designed to examine the effectiveness of completed versions of instruction. Summative comes after the instruction is first used, but before
sustained implementation, whereas confirmative is used after implementation has occured and the design has been used for a reasonable
time usually at least six months to a year p. 278.
According to Morrison, Ross, Kalman,  Kemp 2011, formative evaluation is a process of evaluating and developing the design through identifying the problems.
The researcher needs to organize the evaluation strategies and instructional drafts. In gathering data revision, the researcher uses data information from the drafts. In
this step, the researcher also designs list of questionsstatements for the evaluation
as the instrument.
After gathering the data evaluation, designing revision is the next step. The revision  is  based  on  the  evaluation  result
from  the  evaluators‟  group  in  this research. Therefore, the revision part presents as the final product revision.