Edmodo Features Literature Review 1. Accounting Learning Motivation

written test and question form in data collection techniques. The differences of those research are on where the research were conducted and the dependent variables. In the Sulihin b. Sjukur research, the dependent variables are Learning Motivation and Learning Results. i.e. marks, while the researcher’s dependent variables are Learning Motivation and Learning Achievements. 2. Izuddin Syarif 2012 in his research entitled The Influence of Blended learning Model on Motivation and Achievement of Vocational School Students. The objective of the study is to reveal the differences of the learning motivation and achievement of the students using face-to-face learning model compared to those using blended learning model, the improvement of students’ learning motivation and achievement due to the use of blended learning model, and the interaction of the effect of learning model and motivation on students’ learning achievement in KKPI lesson. This quasi-experimental study used two groups: the experimental group who were taught using blended learning and control group who were taught using face-to-face learning. The population was 11th grade students of SMKN 1 Paringin. A sample of 57 students was divided into 2 groups, with 30 students as the control group and 27 students as the experimental group. The techniques for collecting the data were a test method by giving a written test and non-testing method by distributing a questionnaire. The results of study show that there is significant difference between the learning motivation and achievement of the students using face-to-face learning compared to those using blended learning model, there is a significant increase in learning motivation and achievement due to the use of blended learning model, and there is no interaction of the effect of learning model and motivation on students’ learning achievement in KKPI lesson. The similarity of this research with the research conducted by Izuddin Sharif is both use Blended learning Model and the dependent variables are same, i.e. Learning Motivation and Learning Achievements. The differences of both research are where the implementation of the study, the subjects examined, and the use of class control. 3. Yessica Mega Aprita 2014 in her research entitled Improving Students’ Motivation of Learning Using Blended learning Strategy Facilitated with Vark Learning Style Model. The type of this research is Classroom Action Research aimed to improve students’ Motivation of Learning of Grade X AK 1 SMK Negeri 1 Bantul Academic Year of 20132014. The research is done in two cycles uses two kinds of data collection techniques, i.e. observation and questionnaire. The data collected was analyzed by qualitative analysis using three steps, data reduction, data presentation and conclusion formulation. The analysis is completed with descriptive quantitative analysis to calculate the score of Accounting Learning Motivation. Based on the research result, the implementation of Blended learning Strategy facilitated with VARK Learning Style Model is able to improve students’ Accounting Motivation of Learning of the grade X AK 1 SMK Negeri 1 Bantl Accounting academic year of 20132014. It is proven by the improvements of X AK 1’s average score of Learning Motivation from 76,71 on the first cycle and reaches to 84,18 on the implementation of the second cycle. This improvement shows that using Blended learning Strategy facilitated with VARK Learning Style Model, the students’ Motivation of Learning is increasing classically, without any domination from a few of students of the class. The similarity found in this research is the use of Blended learning model. However, the difference found in the research are where research was conducted, media used, and dependent variable used i.e. Learning Motivation, and data collection technique for Learning Motivation. 4. Wirda 2014 in her research entitled The Influence of Edmodo-based Electronic Learning in Students’ Learning Outcomes in Sound System Installation Training for Grade XI Audio Visual Students in SMKN 1 Kinali. The problem in this study is the fact that the field is found in SMK Negeri 1 Kinali, there are many students who obtain a grade XTAV learning outcomes below the minimum standard criteria in subjects perform a Sound System Installation to set the school 73. That is 65.57 of students who under KKM and 34.42 of students who are above KKM. This study uses experimental approach, this study population is a class XI student of SMK Negeri 1 Kinali TAV Academic Year 20142015. Experimental class is a class that is treated by using electronicbased instructional media Edmodo and the control class is a