by distributing the questionnaires to the lectures of English Education Study Program of Sanata Dharma University and the lecturer of Management Major of Duta Wacana
University. The result of post-design survey would be used to revise and improve
the designed materials.
a. Participants of the Post-Design Survey
The participants of the post-design survey were 2 lecturers of English Education Study Program of Sanata Dharma University and 2 English lecturers of
Management Major of Duta wacana University. The data of the participants were described in table 4.10.
Table 4.10: The Description of Participants of Post-Design Survey
FM Education
Background Teaching Experiences
in year Group
of Participants F
M S1
S2 S3
1-5 6-10
11-15 Lecturers of
English Education Study Program of
Sanata Dharma University
1 1
- 2
- -
- 2
English Lecturers of Management
Major of Duta Wacana
University 1
1 2
- 1
1
b. The Data of the Post- Design Survey
The data of the Post-design Survey were obtained by distributing questionnaires. In the questionnaires, the participants’ opinions were classified to the
agreed degree as follows: 1: if you strongly disagree with the statement
2: if you disagree with the statement 3: if you agree with the statement
4: if you strongly agree with the statement 46
The data of the Post-design Survey were presented in table 4.11.
Table 4.11: The Result of Post-Design Survey
CENTRAL TENDENCY
NO PARTICIPANTS’ OPINION
N Mn
1. The standard competence is well formulated.
4 3.75
2. The basic competences are well formulated.
4 3.5
3. The indicators are well formulated.
4 2.75
4. The indicators are able to support the attainment of
the basic competencies. 4
3 5.
The tasks implemented facilitate the students to meet the basic standard of speaking competence.
4 3.5
6. Task-Based Learning is really developed in the
materials. 4
3 7.
The contents of the materials have been relevant to the needs of learning English speaking.
4 3.75
8. The topics are well formulated and in line with the
level of difficulty. 4
3.5 9.
The tasks in each unit are well elaborated and are able to facilitate the students to understand the topic
being discussed. 4
3.25
10. The instructions are understandable and useful for
both teacher and students. 4
3.5 11.
The contents of the designed materials motivate the students to learn.
4 3.75
12. The materials are in line with the allotted time.
4 3.25
Notes:
N : number of participants
Mn : mean, indicators of central tendency of the set sources
c. Participants’ Comments and Suggestions on the Designed Materials
