Table 19. Imperative Particles co-occurrence restrictions mild suggestion
announcement of intent
command of a prerequisite ‘first…’ brusque command
imperativizing glottal stop
‘let’s’ insistent urging
urging or optative imperative ‘may you…’ verb enlivener qha
verb enlivener pâʔ
violent-climax proverb 202 noun + hê
ʔ a noun + get suggestnoun
‘I’ll get a noun or “Give me a noun”’ Matisoff 1973:351 203 câ
a šē
eat suggestnoun prerequisite
‘Why don’t you eat first before, for example, leaving?’ Matisoff 1973:352 204
ŋà nâʔ yù l
ɛ qha-pî
ve I
gun take and violent-climax
NOM
‘I picked up the gun and…bang’ or ‘I picked up the gun and…let him have it.’ Matisoff 1973:357
These particles freely follow group one above, but are mutually exclusive with groups two and three Matisoff 1973:350.
9.6.3 Lalo verb particles
9.6.3.1 Predicative particles
Lalo has eight predicative particles Björverud 1998:74–75, 80–85 that “add semantic arguments to the verb’s subcategorization” or give information on degree or repetition Björverud 1998:80. Their
meanings are these: • ‘causative’
• ‘concessive’ • ‘beneficiary’
• ‘object exhausted’ • ‘reciprocal’, ‘each other’
• ‘permanence’ • ‘comparative’, ‘more’
• ‘again’ These may follow the main verb or any of the auxiliaries in the first four slots of a verb concatenation
Björverud 1998:78 described in
section 9.3.3 Lalo .
9.6.3.1.1 Causative
The causative particle adds a causee to the predicate, which may be marked by the object marker in addition to an object marker on the patient Björverud 1998:80. The causee is normally animate, but
there are exceptions Björverud 1998:81.
205 u dì
à phàmú dì
tjàq jí
tuq 3
P OBJ
TOP
brother
OBJ
feed go
CAUS
‘[The parents] made her cause go and feed the younger brother patient.’ 206
ʃý dzí thà
i tuq
iron tree don’t rock
CAUS
‘Don’t make the iron tree rock’ Björverud 1998:81
9.6.3.1.2 Concessive
Reduplication of the causative particle produces the concessive particle, which is sometimes considered a politer version of the causative Björverud 1998:81.
207 tý lá
tuqtuq return come concessive
‘let [someone] come back’
9.6.3.1.3 Beneficiary
A beneficial particle introduces a beneficiary into the predicate, who is usually human and always animate. The beneficiary is marked with the object marker, and the patient is not so marked. The
beneficial particle also produces ‘tell’ from ‘say’, and ‘give’ from ‘bring’.
208 u dì s ɛ̀tjhə́ tjhə sɛ̀ vɛ́ ka
wù 3
P OBJ
pear one
CLF
buy bring
BEN
‘Buy a pear for him and give it to him.’ 209 biq
wù say
BEN
‘tell’ Björverud 1998:81 The beneficiary is not always marked, but this leads to ambiguity Björverud 1998:82.
210 tshú ǹ̩dý
dì ʃí
í̍ wù
person head on louse look
BEN
1. ‘The person looks for lice on the head of beneficiary’ 2. ‘look for lice on the head of someone for the person beneficiary’
3. ‘look for lice on the person’s head for someone benificiary.’
9.6.3.1.4 Object exhausted
Exactitude in describing the “exhaustive” particle “eludes the author,” but it “seems to indicate that the action has already taken place” and “affects the entire object or subject” Björverud 1998:82. All known
examples follow a directional verb, usually ‘away’ Björverud 1998:82–83:
211 mà xàq xá
tjí not remember away
EXH
‘not remember anything of’ 212 duq thìq tjí
exit out
EXH
‘all have gone out’ 213 vì
t ẃ tjí
carry up
EXH
‘pick up on back’
9.6.3.1.5 Reciprocal
The reciprocal particle sometimes marks the reciprocating agent with the word “with”; otherwise it is presumed that the subject is plural Björverud 1998:83.
214 tjh ətse ʃỳ
dìhi car
resemble
RECIP
‘The cars resemble each other.’ 215 mú
p ỳ
à pàq kh
ə́ dɛ̀ dìhi corpse carry
IMPF NOM
with hit
RECIP
‘fight with the pall-bearers’ Björverud 1998:83.
9.6.3.1.6 Permanence, or result
The permanence particle is used with verbs or adjectives. With verbs, it indicates a tangible or visible consequence of an action. With adjectives, it indicates some change has occurred Björverud 1998:83.
216 kà tàq
live
PERM
‘be born’
9.6.3.1.7 Comparative
The comparative particle is used with verbs or adjectives. With verbs, it indicates that something is done better than something else. With adjectives it produces the comparative degree, and is part of the
superlative construction Björverud 1998:84.
217 s ɛ̀
djí like
COMP
‘prefer’ 218 sàq
djí know
COMP
‘know better’
219 ɣálaw dì
kjh ɛ́lɛ́ mɛ̀
djí flower
OBJ
more pretty
COMP
‘prettier than a flower’ 220 z
ɛ̀mɛ̀ xá.ì ɣə̀ djí
girl the very big
COMP
‘the oldest girl’
9.6.3.2 Aspectual particles
The twelve aspectual particles in Lalo have the following meanings: • ‘imperfect’
• ‘perfect’ • ‘durative’
• ‘planning to’ • ‘about to’
• ‘after’ • ‘a while’
• ‘preparing immediately to’ • ‘preparing to’
• ‘hypothetical’ • ‘completed’
• ‘declarative’ These may not be combined with each other in contrast to Bisu,
section 9.6.1 Bisu . These modify the
VP
or
AP
, rather than a single
V
or A Björverud 1998:115. Bjørverud warns that her analysis “should be regarded with caution” since “the aspectual system of Lalo holds many mysteries” for her 1998:115.
For the two particles associated with perfective and imperfective aspect, tone is the distinguishing feature: high tone represents perfective and low tone imperfective.
221 lá á
come
PERF
‘has come’ 222 biq
à speak
IMPF
‘says; is saying’ Björverud 1998:115 The durative particle shows continuation regardless of the time indication Björverud 1998:115.
223 tji dj
ə̀ pull in
DUR
‘keep pulling in’ 224 mà
g ə̀
dj ə̀
not run
DUR
‘not be running’ Björverud 1998:115 For the several “preparing to” particles, it is not yet clear what the difference in usage is. The
“planning to” particle shows the agent’s intention Björverud 1998:116.
The declarative particle affirms the validity of the clause Björverud 1998:116. In this respect, it seems to play the role of an illocutionary particle, but its syntactic order is the same as other aspectual
particles. In the following example, the “looking” clause is affirmed. Note: 3PLR= ‘they’ remote 225 ùq
ɣə̀ sí làphìq í́ là
hí á
sí tàqha dú
jí dú we
POSS
3PR tea look
DECL
ugly
PERF
3PLR only-be drink go drink phàq mà dá mà.á
good not OK not be
‘As for our [tea], it’s only when people look at the tea that it is the ugliest; if they drink it, it’s not the case, that it’s bad to drink.’ Björverud 1998:144
9.6.4 Nuosu verb particles