METODE PEMBELAJARAN LEMBAR KERJA SISWA SUMBER BELAJAR PENILAIAN PEDOMAN PENILAIAN

commit to user 122 h. Meminta siswa menjodohkan urutan gambar dengan teks prosedur langkah-langkah cara mengambil uang dengan kartu ATM secara berkelompok. i. Meminta siswa menyusun teks prosedur tentang cara membuat jus apel berdasarkan kegiatan pembuatan yang telah dilakukan secara individu.

7. LANGKAH-LANGKAH DALAM KEGIATAN PEMBELAJARAN.

a. Menanyakan siswa tentang makanan atau minuman kesukaan mereka. Contoh: 1 How are you? 2 What do you need to buy something? 3 Do we need money? b. Menjelaskan tentang generic structure dan language feature dari teks prosedur. 1 Generic structure of procedure texts are: Goal, material, and steps. 2 Language feature of procedure texts are: Commandimperative present tense, action verb, precise vocabulary, and mainly temporal conjunctive relationadverbial. 3 Kalimat-kalimat intruksiimperatif Present Tense Misal: a Insert the ATM card. b Select the menu. 4 Sequencing temporal First…., second……., next…….., then…….., finally……

8. METODE PEMBELAJARAN

Triple P: Presentation, Practice, and Production.

9. LEMBAR KERJA SISWA

Task I. Asking the students to match the sentences with the pictures individually Here are the steps of how to withdraw commit to user 123 money through ATM after you have got your ATM card: First, you come to the ATM booth that provides with the connection of your bank service. Come inside and wait for the instruction shown on the monitor. Second, insert your ATM card in the drive and wait until the machine receives your card signal and press down your password by pushing the button number on the board of monitor. Third, choose the choices of services given by the machine by pushing the keys on the board of the monitor. They are usually about language, kinds of service number of bank note, and total of account you want to draw. Fourth, in a few second, the machine will response on your request and rolls out number of bank note on your request. Fifth, take and count the bank note, and check the rest account in the card before you finish the process. Finally, close the process using the keys and wait for your machine response and rolls out your ATM card and the draw receipt. Take them out and leave the booth. commit to user 124 Task.2 Asking the students to arrange the steps of how to make apple juice based on the activities that they have done in the class room.

10. SUMBER BELAJAR

a. Teks prosedur b. Gambar-gambar yang relevan c. Alat-alat dan bahan untuk membuat jus real object d. Majalah, Koran, dan petunjuk penggunaan alatpemuatan sesuatu.

11. PENILAIAN

a. Teknik : Tes tulis b. Bentuk Instrumen : Kalimat acak dan uraianessai

12. PEDOMAN PENILAIAN

Lihat Writing rubric Kembang Kerang, 23 rd February 2011 Kepala MTs NW I Kb. Kerang Researcher, Muhammad Zaini, S.Pd Muhammad Zaini NIP. 197412312005011017 NIM. S890809114 commit to user 125 CONSTRUCT OF WRITING The writer inferred that writing is a complex cognitive activity in which the writer is demanded to express their ideas, experiences, knowledge, and feelings which covers language elements of content, organization, grammar, vocabulary, and mechanics to form a piece of writing which successfully communicates the writers’ thoughts and ideas on a certain topic. Writing involves several sub-skills. Writing accurately involves spelling correctly, forming letters correctly, writing legibly, punctuating correctly, using correct layouts, choosing the right vocabulary, using grammar correctly, joining sentences correctly in procedure texts which are used to tell someone how to do or make something. commit to user 126 BLUE PRINT OF WRITING TEST School : MTs NW I Kembang Kerang Subject : English Semester : Even Academic Year : 20102011 Competence Standard Basic Competence Lear ning Mate rial Indicators Test Form Scoring Aspects Sco re Expressing meaning through short functional written text and simple essay in the form of procedure in daily life. Expressing meaning and rhetorical step in the form of short essay using various language form accurately, fluently, and acceptably in daily life context in the form of procedure text. Proce dure text Students are able to: Write a procedure text using language form accurately, fluently, and acceptably in daily life. Essay 1. Organization 2. Content 3. Grammar 4. Vocabulary 5. Mechanics Punctuatio n, Capitalizati on and Spelling 1-5 1-5 1-5 1-5 1-5 Note: Competence Standard, Basic Competence, and Indicators taken from the Syllabus Scoring Rubric Scale of Writing Test Writing elements Range score Scale Maximum Score Organization 1-5 6 30 Content 1-5 5 25 Grammar 1-5 4 20 Vocabulary 1-5 3 15 Mechanics 1-5 2 10 Total score 100 Adapted from Techniques in Testing, Evaluating Students’ Writing Harold S. Madsen, 1983: 119 commit to user 127 PRE TEST ITEM Time : 80 minutes School : MTs NW 1 Kembang Kerang Class : IX A Semester : Even Academic Year : 20102011 Instruction: Write a procedure text entitled “How to fry eggs” Put all your ideas based on picture series below then arrange them into a text of procedure. Mixeggs poureggs addsalt eggssaltveg.oil preparefrying pan breakeggs There are four elements to score in writing namely: 1. Organization 2. Grammar 3. Vocabulary 4. Punctuation, spelling, and mechanic commit to user 128 POST TEST ITEM Time : 80 minutes School : MTs NW 1 Kembang Kerang Class : IX A Semester : Even Academic Year : 20102011 Instruction: Write a procedure text entitled “How to cook instant noodles” Put all your ideas based on picture series then arrange them into a text of procedure. There are four elements to score in writing namely: 1. Organization 2. Grammar 3. Vocabulary 4. Punctuation, spelling, and mechanics commit to user 129 SCORES OF PRE-TEST FROM FIRST CORRECTOR Subject : English Class : IX A Semester : Even School : MTs NW 1 Kembang Kerang Academic Year : 20102011 Corrector : Muhammad Zaini No Name Scores Final Scores 1 2 3 4 5 1 S1 2 2 3 3 2 12 2 S2 3 2 2 3 4 14 3 S3 3 2 2 3 2 12 4 S4 3 2 3 3 3 14 5 S5 2 2 3 3 2 12 6 S6 2 2 2 4 2 12 7 S7 3 3 2 3 3 14 8 S8 2 3 2 3 3 13 9 S9 2 3 2 3 3 13 10 S10 2 2 2 2 3 11 11 S11 2 3 2 2 3 12 12 S12 2 2 3 3 3 13 13 S13 2 3 3 3 2 13 14 S14 2 2 3 4 2 13 15 S15 3 4 3 3 3 16 16 S16 3 3 2 3 3 14 17 S17 3 2 3 3 3 14 18 S18 3 2 2 3 3 13 19 S19 2 3 3 3 3 14 20 S20 4 3 2 4 4 17 21 S21 3 2 2 3 3 13 22 S22 4 3 3 3 4 17 23 S23 2 2 2 3 3 12 24 S24 3 2 2 2 3 12 25 S25 3 2 2 3 2 12 26 S26 3 2 3 2 3 13 27 S27 2 2 3 3 2 12 28 S28 3 2 3 2 3 13 29 S29 3 4 3 3 3 16 30 S30 2 2 2 3 2 11 31 S31 2 3 3 2 3 13 32 S32 3 2 2 3 3 13 Total 83 78 79 93 90 423 Final Scores 504 390 316 279 182 1673 Maximal Scores 960 800 640 480 320 3200 Average Score 2.5938 2.4375 2.46875 2.9063 2.8125 13.21875 Percentage 8.65 9.75 12.34 19.38 28.13 15.65 commit to user 130 SCORES OF PRE-TEST FROM FIRST CORRECTOR Subject : English Class : IX A Semester : Even School : MTs NW 1 Kembang Kerang Academic Year : 20102011 Corrector : Muhammad Zaini 1 2 3 4 5 12 10 12 9 4 47 18 10 8 9 8 53 18 10 8 9 4 49 18 10 12 9 6 55 12 10 12 9 4 47 12 10 8 12 4 46 18 15 8 9 6 56 12 15 8 9 6 50 12 15 8 9 6 50 12 10 8 6 6 42 12 15 8 6 6 47 12 10 12 9 6 49 12 15 12 9 4 52 12 10 12 12 4 50 18 20 12 9 6 65 18 15 8 9 6 56 18 10 12 9 6 55 18 10 8 9 6 51 12 15 12 9 6 54 24 15 8 12 8 67 18 10 8 9 6 51 24 15 12 9 8 68 12 10 8 9 6 45 18 10 8 6 6 48 18 10 8 9 4 49 18 10 12 6 6 52 12 10 12 9 4 47 18 10 12 6 6 52 18 20 12 9 6 65 12 10 8 9 4 43 12 15 12 6 6 51 18 10 8 9 6 51 498 390 316 279 180 1663 504 390 316 279 182 1673 960 800 640 480 320 3200 15.5625 12.1875 9.875 8.71875 5.625 51.96875 51.88 48.75 49.38 58.13 56.25 52.88 51.96875 commit to user 131 SCORES OF PRE-TEST FROM SECOND CORRECTOR Subject : English Class : IX A Semester : Even School : MTs NW 1 Kembang Kerang Academic Year : 20102011 Corrector : Sabrin, SS No Name Scores Final Scores 1 2 3 4 5 1 S1 2 3 3 2 3 13 2 S2 3 2 2 3 4 14 3 S3 2 2 2 3 3 12 4 S4 3 3 4 3 3 16 5 S5 3 2 3 3 4 15 6 S6 2 2 2 4 2 12 7 S7 2 3 2 3 3 13 8 S8 3 2 2 3 3 13 9 S9 3 2 2 3 3 13 10 S10 3 2 2 2 3 12 11 S11 2 2 3 3 3 13 12 S12 2 2 3 3 3 13 13 S13 2 2 3 3 2 12 14 S14 3 2 3 4 2 14 15 S15 3 2 3 3 4 15 16 S16 3 3 2 3 3 14 17 S17 3 2 2 2 3 12 18 S18 2 2 2 3 3 12 19 S19 3 3 3 3 3 15 20 S20 3 4 3 3 3 16 21 S21 3 2 3 2 2 12 22 S22 3 3 3 3 4 16 23 S23 2 3 2 3 3 13 24 S24 3 2 2 2 3 12 25 S25 3 2 2 3 2 12 26 S26 3 2 3 2 3 13 27 S27 3 2 3 3 2 13 28 S28 3 2 3 2 3 13 29 S29 2 2 2 4 2 12 30 S30 3 2 2 3 2 12 31 S31 2 3 3 2 3 13 32 S32 2 2 2 3 3 12 Total 84 74 81 91 92 422 Final Scores 564 370 324 273 182 1717 Maximal Scores 960 800 640 480 320 3200 Average Score 2.625 2.3125 2.53125 2.8438 2.875 13.1875 Percentage 8.75 9.25 12.66 18.96 28.75 15.67 commit to user 132 SCORES OF PRE-TEST FROM SECOND CORRECTOR Subject : English Class : IX A Semester : Even School : MTs NW 1 Kembang Kerang Academic Year : 20102011 Corrector : Sabrin, SS 1 2 3 4 5 12 15 12 6 6 51 18 10 8 9 8 53 12 10 8 9 6 45 18 15 12 9 6 60 18 10 12 9 8 57 12 10 8 12 4 46 12 15 8 9 6 50 18 10 8 9 6 51 18 10 8 9 6 51 18 10 8 6 6 48 12 10 12 9 6 49 12 10 12 9 6 49 12 10 12 9 4 47 18 10 12 12 4 56 18 10 12 9 8 57 18 15 8 9 6 56 18 10 8 6 6 48 12 10 8 9 6 45 18 15 12 9 6 60 18 20 12 9 6 65 18 10 12 6 4 50 18 15 12 9 8 62 12 15 8 9 6 50 18 10 8 6 6 48 18 10 8 9 4 49 18 10 12 6 6 52 18 12 12 9 4 55 18 10 12 8 6 54 12 10 8 12 4 46 18 10 8 9 4 49 12 15 12 6 6 51 12 12 10 9 6 49 504 374 322 275 184 1659 564 370 324 273 182 1717 960 800 640 480 320 3200 15.75 11.6875 10.0625 8.59375 5.75 51.84375 52.50 46.75 50.31 57.29 57.50 52.87 51.84375 commit to user 133 THE RESULT OF THE INTER-RATER SCORES OF PRE-TEST Subject : English Class : IX A Semester : Even School : MTs NW 1 Kembang Kerang Academic Year : 20102011 No Name Cor. I Cor.II Avrg. 1 S1 47 51 49 2 S2 53 53 53 3 S3 49 45 47 4 S4 55 60 57.5 5 S5 47 57 52 6 S6 46 46 46 7 S7 56 50 53 8 S8 50 51 50.5 9 S9 50 51 50.5 10 S10 42 48 45 11 S11 47 49 48 12 S12 49 49 49 13 S13 52 47 49.5 14 S14 50 56 53 15 S15 65 57 61 16 S16 56 56 56 17 S17 55 48 51.5 18 S18 51 45 48 19 S19 54 60 57 20 S20 67 65 66 21 S21 51 50 50.5 22 S22 68 62 65 23 S23 45 50 47.5 24 S24 48 48 48 25 S25 49 49 49 26 S26 52 52 52 27 S27 47 55 51 28 S28 52 54 53 29 S29 65 46 55.5 30 S30 43 49 46 31 S31 51 51 51 32 S32 51 49 50 Total 1663 1717 1661 Average Score 51.9688 51.84375 51.90625 Max. Organization 15.562 15.75 15.656 30 Content 12.19 11.69 11.937 25 Grammar 9.875 10.062 9.9685 20 Vocabulary 8.718 8.593 8.6555 15 Mechanics 5.25 5.75 5.5 10 51.59 51.84 51.72 100 commit to user 134 SCORES OF CYCLE I FROM FIRST CORRECTOR Subject : English Class : IX A Semester : Even School : MTs NW 1 Kembang Kerang Academic Year : 20102011 Corrector : Muhammad Zaini No Name Score Final Scores 1 2 3 4 5 1 S1 3 2 3 2 4 14 2 S2 3 2 3 3 5 16 3 S3 3 2 2 3 2 12 4 S4 3 3 4 3 3 16 5 S5 3 2 3 3 4 15 6 S6 3 2 2 4 4 15 7 S7 3 3 2 3 3 14 8 S8 3 2 2 3 3 13 9 S9 3 3 2 3 2 13 10 S10 3 2 2 3 2 12 11 S11 3 3 2 3 4 15 12 S12 2 2 3 3 3 13 13 S13 3 3 3 3 3 15 14 S14 2 2 3 4 3 14 15 S15 4 3 2 3 4 16 16 S16 3 3 2 3 3 14 17 S17 3 2 2 3 3 13 18 S18 3 2 2 3 3 13 19 S19 2 3 3 3 4 15 20 S20 4 3 4 4 4 19 21 S21 3 3 2 3 4 15 22 S22 4 3 2 3 4 16 23 S23 2 3 3 3 3 14 24 S24 3 2 2 2 3 12 25 S25 3 3 3 3 3 15 26 S26 3 2 3 2 3 13 27 S27 2 3 3 3 3 14 28 S28 4 2 2 4 2 14 29 S29 4 3 3 3 3 16 30 S30 3 2 2 3 3 13 31 S31 2 3 3 2 3 13 32 S32 3 3 2 3 3 14 Total 95 81 81 96 103 456 Final Scores 576 405 324 288 206 1798 Maximal Scores 960 800 640 480 320 3200 Average Score 2.9688 2.53125 2.53125 3 3.2188 2.85 Percentage 9.90 10.13 12.66 20.00 32.19 16.97 commit to user 135 SCORES OF CYCLE I FROM FIRST CORRECTOR Subject : English Class : IX A Semester : Even School : MTs NW 1 Kembang Kerang Academic Year : 20102011 Corrector : Muhammad Zaini 1 2 3 4 5 18 10 12 6 8 54 18 10 12 9 10 59 18 10 8 9 4 49 18 15 16 9 6 64 18 10 12 9 8 57 18 10 8 12 8 56 18 15 8 9 6 56 18 10 8 9 6 51 18 15 8 9 4 54 18 10 8 9 4 49 18 15 8 9 8 58 12 10 12 9 6 49 18 15 12 9 6 60 12 10 12 12 6 52 18 15 8 9 8 58 18 15 8 9 6 56 18 10 8 9 6 51 18 10 8 9 6 51 12 15 12 9 8 56 24 15 16 12 8 75 18 15 8 9 8 58 24 15 8 9 8 64 12 15 12 9 6 54 18 10 8 6 6 48 18 15 12 9 6 60 18 10 12 6 6 52 12 15 12 9 6 54 24 10 8 12 4 58 24 15 12 9 6 66 18 10 8 9 6 51 12 15 12 6 6 51 18 15 8 9 6 56 564 405 324 288 206 1787 576 405 324 288 206 1798 960 800 640 480 320 3200 17.625 12.65625 10.125 9 6.4375 55.84375 58.75 50.63 50.63 60.00 64.38 56.88 55.84375 commit to user 136 SCORES OF CYCLE I FROM SECOND CORRECTOR Subject : English Class : IX A Semester : Even School : MTs NW 1 Kembang Kerang Academic Year : 20102011 Corrector : Sabrin,SS No Name Scores Final Scores 1 2 3 4 5 1 S1 3 3 3 3 3 15 2 S2 2 4 2 3 4 15 3 S3 4 3 2 3 3 15 4 S4 3 3 4 3 3 16 5 S5 2 2 3 3 4 14 6 S6 2 3 3 4 3 15 7 S7 3 3 2 3 3 14 8 S8 2 3 2 3 3 13 9 S9 2 3 2 3 3 13 10 S10 2 2 2 4 3 13 11 S11 2 3 2 3 3 13 12 S12 2 2 3 3 3 13 13 S13 2 3 3 3 3 14 14 S14 2 3 3 4 4 16 15 S15 2 4 3 3 4 16 16 S16 3 3 2 3 3 14 17 S17 2 2 2 2 3 11 18 S18 2 3 2 3 3 13 19 S19 3 2 3 3 3 14 20 S20 4 4 4 3 3 18 21 S21 2 3 3 3 3 14 22 S22 3 4 3 3 4 17 23 S23 3 3 2 3 3 14 24 S24 2 3 2 2 3 12 25 S25 3 4 2 3 3 15 26 S26 2 3 3 2 3 13 27 S27 2 2 3 3 4 14 28 S28 3 3 3 3 3 15 29 S29 3 4 2 4 3 16 30 S30 3 3 2 3 2 13 31 S31 3 2 3 3 3 14 32 S32 2 3 3 3 3 14 Total 80 95 83 97 101 456 Final Scores 456 475 328 273 202 1733 Maximal Scores 960 800 640 480 320 3200 Average Score 2.5 2.96875 2.59375 3.0313 3.1563 2.85 Percentage 8.33 11.88 12.97 18.95 31.56 16.74 commit to user 137 SCORES OF CYCLE I FROM SECOND CORRECTOR Subject : English Class : IX A Semester : Even School : MTs NW 1 Kembang Kerang Academic Year : 20102011 Corrector : Sabrin,SS 1 2 3 4 5 18 15 12 9 6 60 18 20 8 9 8 63 24 15 8 9 6 62 18 15 16 9 6 64 12 10 12 9 8 51 12 15 12 12 6 57 18 15 8 9 6 56 12 15 8 9 8 52 12 15 8 9 6 50 12 10 8 12 6 48 12 15 8 9 6 50 12 10 12 9 8 51 12 15 12 9 6 54 12 15 12 12 8 59 12 20 12 9 8 61 18 15 8 9 6 56 18 10 8 9 6 51 18 15 8 9 6 56 18 10 12 9 6 55 24 20 16 12 8 80 18 15 12 9 6 60 24 20 12 12 8 76 18 15 8 9 6 56 18 15 8 9 6 56 18 20 8 9 6 61 12 15 12 6 6 51 12 10 12 9 8 51 18 15 12 9 6 60 18 20 8 12 6 64 18 15 8 9 4 54 18 10 12 9 6 55 18 10 12 9 6 55 522 470 332 303 208 1835 456 475 328 273 202 1733 960 800 640 480 320 3200 16.3125 14.6875 10.375 9.46875 6.5 57.34375 54.38 58.75 51.88 63.13 65.00 58.63 57.34375 commit to user 138 THE RESULT OF THE INTER-RATER SCORE OF FIRST CYCLE Subject : English Class : IX A Semester : Even School : MTs NW 1 Kembang Kerang Academic Year : 20102011 No Name Corr. I Corr. II Avrg. 1 S1 54 60 57 2 S2 59 63 61 3 S3 49 62 55.5 4 S4 64 64 64 5 S5 57 51 54 6 S6 56 57 56.5 7 S7 56 56 56 8 S8 51 52 51.5 9 S9 54 50 52 10 S10 49 48 48.5 11 S11 58 50 54 12 S12 49 51 50 13 S13 60 54 57 14 S14 52 59 55.5 15 S15 58 61 59.5 16 S16 56 56 56 17 S17 51 51 51 18 S18 51 56 53.5 19 S19 56 55 55.5 20 S20 75 80 77.5 21 S21 58 60 59 22 S22 64 76 70 23 S23 54 56 55 24 S24 48 56 52 25 S25 60 61 60.5 26 S26 52 51 51.5 27 S27 54 51 52.5 28 S28 58 60 59 29 S29 66 64 65 30 S30 51 54 52.5 31 S31 51 55 53 32 S32 56 55 55.5 1798 1835 1811 Average score 55.8438 57.41935 56.63155 Max. Organization 17.625 16.312 16.9685 30 Content 12.656 14.687 13.6715 25 Grammar 10.125 10.375 10.25 20 Vocabulary 9 9.468 9.234 15 Mechanics 6.437 6.5 6.4685 10 55.843 57.342 56.5925 100 commit to user 139 SCORES OF CYCLE II FROM FIRST CORRECTOR Subject : English Class : IX A Semester : Even School : MTs NW 1 Kembang Kerang Academic Year : 20102011 Corrector : Muhammad Zaini No Nam e Scores Final Scores 1 2 3 4 5 1 S1 3 3 3 4 4 17 2 S2 3 4 3 4 4 18 3 S3 3 3 3 4 4 17 4 S4 3 3 3 3 4 16 5 S5 3 3 3 3 4 16 6 S6 3 4 3 4 4 18 7 S7 3 3 3 3 4 16 8 S8 4 3 3 4 3 17 9 S9 3 4 3 3 4 17 10 S10 2 3 3 3 3 14 11 S11 3 3 3 4 3 16 12 S12 3 3 3 3 4 16 13 S13 3 3 3 3 4 16 14 S14 3 4 3 4 3 17 15 S15 3 4 3 3 4 17 16 S16 3 3 3 3 3 15 17 S17 3 3 3 3 3 15 18 S18 3 3 3 3 3 15 19 S19 4 4 3 3 4 18 20 S20 4 4 4 4 4 20 21 S21 3 3 3 3 3 15 22 S22 4 4 3 3 4 18 23 S23 4 3 3 2 4 16 24 S24 3 3 3 3 4 16 25 S25 4 4 3 3 4 18 26 S26 3 3 3 3 4 16 27 S27 3 3 3 3 4 16 28 S28 3 4 3 4 4 18 29 S29 3 3 3 3 4 16 30 S30 4 3 3 3 4 17 31 S31 3 3 3 3 3 15 32 S32 4 3 3 3 4 17 Total 103 106 97 104 119 529 Final scores 618 535 408 312 244 2124 Maximal Scores 960 800 640 480 320 3200 Average Score 3.2188 3.3125 3.03125 3.25 3.7188 3.30625 Percentage 10.73 13.25 15.16 21.67 37.19 19.60 commit to user 140 SCORES OF CYCLE II FROM FIRST CORRECTOR Subject : English Class : IX A Semester : Even School : MTs NW 1 Kembang Kerang Academic Year : 20102011 Corrector : Muhammad Zaini 1 2 3 4 5 18 15 12 12 8 65 18 20 12 12 8 70 18 15 12 12 8 65 18 15 12 9 8 62 18 15 12 9 8 62 18 20 12 12 8 70 18 15 12 9 8 62 24 15 12 12 8 71 18 20 12 9 8 67 12 15 12 9 6 54 18 15 12 12 8 65 18 15 12 9 6 60 18 15 12 9 6 60 18 20 12 12 8 70 18 20 12 9 8 67 18 15 12 9 6 60 18 15 12 9 8 62 18 15 12 9 6 60 24 20 12 9 6 71 24 20 16 12 8 80 18 15 12 9 8 62 24 20 12 9 8 73 24 15 12 6 6 63 18 15 12 9 8 62 24 20 12 9 8 73 18 15 12 9 8 62 18 15 12 9 8 62 18 20 12 12 8 70 18 15 12 9 8 62 24 15 12 9 8 68 18 15 12 9 9 63 24 15 12 9 9 69 618 530 388 312 244 2092 618 535 408 312 244 2124 960 800 640 480 320 3200 19.3125 16.5625 12.125 9.75 7.625 65.375 64.38 66.25 60.63 65.00 76.25 66.50 65.375 commit to user 141 SCORES OF SECOND CYCLE II FROM SECOND CORRECTOR Subject : English Class : IX A Semester : Odd School : MTs NW 1 Kembang Kerang Academic Year : 20102011 Corrector : Sabrin, SS No Name Scores Final Scores 1 2 3 4 5 1 S1 3 3 3 4 3 16 2 S2 4 4 3 4 4 19 3 S3 3 3 3 3 4 16 4 S4 4 3 3 4 4 18 5 S5 3 3 3 3 4 16 6 S6 4 3 3 4 4 18 7 S7 3 3 4 3 3 16 8 S8 3 3 3 3 4 16 9 S9 3 4 3 3 4 17 10 S10 3 3 3 3 3 15 11 S11 3 4 3 4 4 18 12 S12 3 4 3 3 4 17 13 S13 3 3 3 3 4 16 14 S14 4 3 3 4 4 18 15 S15 4 3 3 4 4 18 16 S16 3 3 3 3 3 15 17 S17 4 3 4 3 4 18 18 S18 3 3 3 3 3 15 19 S19 4 3 3 3 4 17 20 S20 4 4 4 4 4 20 21 S21 3 4 3 3 4 17 22 S22 4 4 3 4 4 19 23 S23 3 3 3 3 4 16 24 S24 3 3 3 4 3 16 25 S25 3 3 3 4 4 17 26 S26 3 3 3 3 4 16 27 S27 3 3 3 3 4 16 28 S28 3 4 3 4 3 17 29 S29 4 4 3 3 4 18 30 S30 3 3 3 3 4 16 31 S31 3 3 3 4 3 16 32 S32 3 3 3 3 4 16 Total 106 105 99 109 120 2143 Final Scores 636 520 416 327 244 2143 Maximal Scores 960 800 640 480 320 3200 Average Scores 3.3125 3.28125 3.09375 3.4063 3.75 3.36875 Percentage 11.04 13.13 15.47 22.71 37.50 19.97 commit to user 142 SCORES OF CYCLE II FROM SECOND CORRECTOR Subject : English Class : IX A Semester : Odd School : MTs NW 1 Kembang Kerang Academic Year : 20102011 Corrector : Sabrin, SS 1 2 3 4 5 18 15 9 12 6 60 24 20 12 12 8 76 18 15 12 9 8 62 24 15 12 12 8 71 18 15 12 9 8 62 24 15 12 12 8 71 18 15 16 9 6 64 18 15 12 9 8 62 18 20 12 9 8 67 18 10 12 9 6 55 18 20 12 12 8 70 18 20 12 9 8 67 18 15 12 9 8 62 24 15 12 12 8 71 24 15 12 12 8 71 18 15 12 9 6 60 24 15 16 9 8 72 18 15 12 9 6 60 24 15 12 9 8 68 24 20 16 12 8 80 18 20 12 9 8 67 24 20 12 12 8 76 18 15 12 9 8 62 18 15 12 12 6 63 18 15 12 12 8 65 18 15 12 9 8 62 18 15 12 9 8 62 18 20 12 12 6 68 24 20 12 9 8 73 18 15 12 9 8 62 18 15 12 12 6 63 18 15 12 9 8 62 636 520 393 327 240 2143 636 520 416 327 244 2143 960 800 640 480 320 3200 19.875 16.25 12.28125 10.21875 7.5 66.125 66.25 65.00 61.41 68.13 75.00 67.16 66.125 commit to user 143 THE RESULT OF THE INTER-RATER SCORE OF CYCLE II Subject : English Class : IX A Semester : Even School : MTs NW 1 Kembang Kerang Academic Year : 201020011 No Name Corr. I Corr. II Avrg. 1 S1 65 60 62.5 2 S2 70 76 73 3 S3 65 62 63.5 4 S4 62 71 66.5 5 S5 62 62 62 6 S6 70 71 70.5 7 S7 62 64 63 8 S8 71 62 66.5 9 S9 67 67 67 10 S10 54 55 54.5 11 S11 65 70 67.5 12 S12 60 67 63.5 13 S13 60 62 61 14 S14 70 71 70.5 15 S15 67 71 69 16 S16 60 60 60 17 S17 62 72 67 18 S18 60 60 60 19 S19 71 68 69.5 20 S20 80 80 80 21 S21 62 67 64.5 22 S22 73 76 74.5 23 S23 63 62 62.5 24 S24 62 63 62.5 25 S25 62 65 63.5 26 S26 70 62 66 27 S27 62 62 62 28 S28 70 68 69 29 S29 62 73 67.5 30 S30 68 62 65 31 S31 63 63 63 32 S32 69 62 65.5 Total 2124 2143 2133.5 Average score 65.2813 66.125 65.70313 Max. Organization 19.312 19.875 19.5935 30 Content 16.562 16.25 16.406 25 Grammar 12.125 12.281 12.203 20 Vocabulary 9.75 10.218 9.984 15 Mechanic 7.625 7.5 7.5625 10 65.374 66.124 65.749 100 commit to user 144 SCORES OF POST-TEST FROM FIRST CORRECTOR Subject : English Class : IX A Semester : Even School : MTs NW 1 Kembang Kerang Academic Year : 20102011 Corrector : Muhammad Zaini No Name Scores Final Scores 1 2 3 4 5 1 S1 4 4 4 4 4 20 2 S2 4 4 4 4 4 20 3 S3 4 4 4 4 4 20 4 S4 4 4 4 4 4 20 5 S5 4 3 4 4 4 19 6 S6 4 4 4 4 4 20 7 S7 4 4 4 4 4 20 8 S8 4 3 4 4 4 19 9 S9 4 4 4 4 4 20 10 S10 3 4 4 4 4 19 11 S11 4 4 4 4 4 20 12 S12 4 4 4 4 4 20 13 S13 4 3 4 4 4 19 14 S14 3 4 4 4 4 19 15 S15 4 4 4 4 4 20 16 S16 4 4 4 4 4 20 17 S17 4 4 4 4 4 20 18 S18 4 4 4 4 4 20 19 S19 4 4 4 4 4 20 20 S20 5 4 4 5 4 22 21 S21 4 4 3 4 3 18 22 S22 5 5 4 5 4 23 23 S23 4 4 4 3 4 19 24 S24 4 4 4 4 4 20 25 S25 4 4 3 3 4 18 26 S26 4 3 4 4 4 19 27 S27 4 4 4 4 4 20 28 S28 4 4 4 4 4 20 29 S29 3 4 4 3 4 18 30 S30 4 4 4 4 4 20 31 S31 4 4 4 3 4 19 32 S32 4 4 4 4 4 20 Total 127 125 126 126 127 631 Final scores 250 246 248 248 250 1242 Maximal Scores 960 800 640 480 320 3200 Average Score 3.96875 3.90625 3.9375 3.9375 3.968 19.718 Percentage 13.23 15.63 19.69 26.25 39.69 22.90 commit to user 145 SCORES OF POST-TEST FROM FIRST CORRECTOR Subject : English Class : IX A Semester : Even School : MTs NW 1 Kembang Kerang Academic Year : 20102011 Corrector : Muhammad Zaini 1 2 3 4 5 24 20 16 12 8 80 24 20 16 12 8 80 24 20 16 12 8 80 24 20 16 12 8 80 24 15 16 12 8 75 24 20 16 12 8 80 24 20 16 12 8 80 24 15 16 12 8 75 24 20 16 12 8 80 18 20 16 12 8 74 24 20 16 12 8 80 24 20 16 12 8 80 24 15 16 12 8 75 18 20 16 12 8 74 24 20 16 12 8 80 24 20 16 12 8 80 24 20 16 12 8 80 24 20 16 12 8 80 24 20 16 12 8 80 30 20 16 15 8 89 24 20 12 12 6 74 30 25 16 15 8 94 24 20 16 9 8 77 24 20 16 12 8 80 24 20 12 9 8 73 24 15 16 12 8 75 24 20 16 12 8 80 24 20 16 12 8 80 18 20 16 9 8 71 24 20 16 12 8 80 24 20 16 9 8 77 24 20 16 12 8 80 762 625 504 378 254 2523 960 800 640 480 320 3200 23.8125 19.53125 15.75 11.8125 7.937 78.843 79.38 78.13 78.75 78.75 79.38 78.88 78.84375 commit to user 146 SCORES OF POST-TEST FROM SECOND CORRECTOR Subject : English Class : IX A Semester : Odd School : MTs NW 1 Kembang Kerang Academic Year : 20102011 Corrector : Sabrin, SS No Name Scores Final Scores 1 2 3 4 5 1 S1 4 4 4 4 4 20 2 S2 4 4 4 4 4 20 3 S3 4 4 4 4 4 20 4 S4 4 4 4 4 4 20 5 S5 4 4 3 4 4 19 6 S6 4 4 4 4 4 20 7 S7 4 4 4 4 4 20 8 S8 4 4 4 4 4 20 9 S9 4 4 4 4 4 20 10 S10 4 3 4 3 4 18 11 S11 4 4 4 4 4 20 12 S12 4 4 4 4 4 20 13 S13 3 3 3 3 4 16 14 S14 4 4 4 5 4 21 15 S15 4 4 4 4 4 20 16 S16 4 3 3 4 3 17 17 S17 4 4 4 4 4 20 18 S18 4 4 4 4 4 20 19 S19 4 4 4 4 4 20 20 S20 5 4 5 5 4 23 21 S21 4 4 4 3 4 19 22 S22 5 4 4 4 4 21 23 S23 4 4 3 3 4 18 24 S24 4 4 3 4 4 19 25 S25 4 3 4 4 4 19 26 S26 4 4 3 4 4 19 27 S27 4 4 4 4 4 20 28 S28 4 4 4 4 4 20 29 S29 3 4 4 4 4 19 30 S30 4 4 3 4 4 19 31 S31 3 4 4 4 4 19 32 S32 4 4 4 4 4 20 Total 127 124 122 126 127 626 Final Scores Maximal Scores 960 800 640 480 320 3200 Average Scores 3.96875 3.875 3.8125 3.9375 3.96875 19.5625 Percentage 13.23 15.50 19.06 26.25 39.69 22.75 commit to user 147 SCORES OF POST-TEST FROM SECOND CORRECTOR Subject : English Class : IX A Semester : Odd School : MTs NW 1 Kembang Kerang Academic Year : 20102011 Corrector : Sabrin, SS 1 2 3 4 5 24 20 12 12 8 76 24 20 16 12 8 80 24 20 16 12 8 80 24 20 16 12 8 80 24 20 16 12 8 80 24 20 12 12 8 76 24 20 16 12 8 80 24 20 16 12 8 80 24 20 16 12 8 80 24 15 16 9 8 72 24 20 16 12 8 80 24 20 16 12 8 80 18 15 16 9 8 66 24 20 12 15 8 79 24 20 16 12 8 80 24 15 16 12 8 75 24 20 12 12 6 74 24 20 16 12 8 80 24 20 16 12 8 80 30 20 16 15 8 89 24 20 20 9 8 81 30 20 16 12 8 86 24 20 16 9 8 77 24 20 12 12 8 76 24 15 12 12 8 71 24 20 16 12 8 80 24 20 12 12 8 76 24 20 16 12 8 80 18 20 16 12 8 74 24 20 16 12 8 80 18 20 12 12 8 70 24 20 16 12 8 80 762 620 484 378 254 2498 960 800 640 480 320 3200 23.8125 19.375 15.125 11.8125 7.9375 78.0625 79.38 77.50 75.63 78.75 79.38 78.13 78.0625 commit to user 148 THE RESULT OF THE INTER-RATER SCORE OF POST-TEST Subject : English Class : IX A Semester : Even School : MTs NW 1 Kembang Kerang Academic Year : 201020011 No Name Corr. I Corr. II Avrg. 1 S1 80 76 78 2 S2 80 80 80 3 S3 80 80 80 4 S4 80 80 80 5 S5 75 80 77.5 6 S6 80 76 78 7 S7 80 80 80 8 S8 75 80 77.5 9 S9 80 80 80 10 S10 74 72 73 11 S11 80 80 80 12 S12 80 80 80 13 S13 75 66 70.5 14 S14 74 79 76.5 15 S15 80 80 80 16 S16 80 75 77.5 17 S17 80 74 77 18 S18 80 80 80 19 S19 80 80 80 20 S20 89 89 89 21 S21 74 81 77.5 22 S22 94 86 90 23 S23 77 77 77 24 S24 80 76 78 25 S25 73 71 72 26 S26 75 80 77.5 27 S27 80 76 78 28 S28 80 80 80 29 S29 71 74 72.5 30 S30 80 81 80.5 31 S31 77 70 73.5 32 S32 80 80 80 Total 2523 2499 2511 Average score 78.84375 78.09375 78.46875 Max. Organization 23.812 23.812 23.812 30 Content 19.531 19.375 19.453 25 Grammar 15.75 15.125 15.4375 20 Vocabulary 11.8125 11.812 11.81225 15 Mechanic 7.937 7.937 7.937 10 78.843 78.061 78.452 100 commit to user 149 The Improvement of Students’ Achievement from Pre-test to Post-test commit to user 150 t-tes of non independent Between Pre-test and Cycle I S.N Pre-test Cycle I D D² 1 49 57 8 64 2 53 61 8 64 3 47 55.5 8.5 72.25 4 57.5 64 6.5 42.25 5 52 54 2 4 6 46 56.5 10.5 110.25 7 53 56 3 9 8 50.5 51.5 1 1 9 50.5 52 1.5 2.25 10 45 48.5 3.5 12.25 11 48 54 6 36 12 49 50 1 1 13 49.5 57 7.5 56.25 14 53 55.5 2.5 6.25 15 61 59.5 -1.5 2.25 16 56 56 17 51.5 51 -0.5 0.25 18 48 53.5 5.5 30.25 19 57 55.5 -1.5 2.25 20 66 77.5 11.5 132.25 21 50.5 59 8.5 72.25 22 65 70 5 25 23 47.5 55 7.5 56.25 24 48 52 4 16 25 49 60.5 11.5 132.25 26 52 51.5 -0.5 0.25 27 51 52.5 1.5 2.25 28 53 59 6 36 29 55.5 65 9.5 90.25 30 46 52.5 6.5 42.25 31 51 53 2 4 32 50 55.3 5.3 28.09 ∑ 1661 1810.8 149.8 1152.84 commit to user 151 t-test of non independent between the Pre-test and Cycle I Because t o 93818881 . 6 is higher than t t 31, 0,05 1.960 or t o t t , it can be concluded that there is a significant different between the result of the Pre-test and Cycle I . 93818881 . 6 0.67470778 68125 . 4 45523059 . 68125 . 4 992 58875 . 451 68125 . 4 1 32 32 32 8 . 149 84 . 1152 68125 . 4 1 32 32 32 8 . 149 84 . 1152 32 8 . 149 1 D² 2 2 2 = = = = - - = - - = - å - = å n n n D t D commit to user 152 t-tes of non independent Between Cycle I and Cycle II S.N Cycle I Cycle II D D² 1 57 62.5 5.5 30.25 2 61 73 12 144 3 55.5 52.5 -3 9 4 64 63.5 -0.5 0.25 5 54 66.5 12.5 156.25 6 56.5 62 5.5 30.25 7 56 70.5 14.5 210.25 8 51.5 63 11.5 132.25 9 52 66.5 14.5 210.25 10 48.5 67 18.5 342.25 11 54 54.5 0.5 0.25 12 50 67.5 17.5 306.25 13 57 63.5 6.5 42.25 14 55.5 70.5 15 225 15 59.5 69 9.5 16 56 60 4 16 17 51 67 16 256 18 53.5 60 6.5 42.25 19 55.5 69.5 14 196 20 77.5 80 2.5 6.25 21 59 64.5 5.5 30.25 22 70 74.5 4.5 20.25 23 55 62.5 7.5 56.25 24 52 62.5 10.5 110.25 25 60.5 63.5 3 9 26 51.5 66 14.5 210.25 27 52.5 62 9.5 90.25 28 59 69 10 100 29 65 67.5 2.5 6.25 30 52.5 65 12.5 156.25 31 53 63 10 100 32 55.3 65.5 10.2 104.04 ∑ 1810.8 2094 283.2 3348.29 commit to user 153 t-test of non independent between Cycle I and Cycle II Because t o 9.60618172 is higher than t t 31, 0,05 1.960 or t o t t , it can be concluded that there is a significant different between the result of Cycle I and Cycle II. 9.60618172 0.92128176 85 . 8 0.84876008 85 . 8 992 841.97 85 . 8 1 32 32 32 2 . 283 3348.29 85 . 8 1 32 32 32 2 . 283 3348.29 32 2 . 283 1 D² 2 2 2 = = = = - - = - - = - å - = å n n n D t D commit to user 154 t-tes of non independent Between Cycle II and Post-test S.N Cycle II Post- test D D² 1 62.5 78 15.5 240.25 2 73 80 7 49 3 3 80 77 5929 4 63.5 80 16.5 272.25 5 66.5 77.5 11 121 6 62 78 16 256 7 70.5 80 9.5 90.25 8 63 77.5 14.5 210.25 9 66.5 80 13.5 182.25 10 67 73 6 36 11 54.5 80 25.5 650.25 12 67.5 80 12.5 156.25 13 63.5 70.5 7 49 14 70.5 76.5 6 36 15 69 80 11 121 16 60 77.5 17.5 306.25 17 67 77 10 100 18 60 80 20 400 19 69.5 80 10.5 110.25 20 80 89 9 81 21 64.5 77.5 13 169 22 74.5 90 15.5 240.25 23 62.5 77 14.5 210.25 24 62.5 78 15.5 240.25 25 63.5 72 8.5 72.25 26 66 77.5 11.5 132.25 27 62 78 16 256 28 69 80 11 121 29 67.5 72.5 5 25 30 65 80.5 15.5 240.25 31 63 73.5 10.5 110.25 32 65.5 80 14.5 210.25 ∑ 2044.5 2511 466.5 11423.25 commit to user 155 t-test of non independent between Cycle II and the Post-test Because t o 2 6.75330675 is higher than t t 31, 0,05 1.960 or t o t t , it can be concluded that there is a significant different between the result of Cycle II and the Post-test . 2 6.75330675 6 2.15866471 14.578125 4 4.65983335 14.578125 992 8 4622.55468 14.578125 1 32 32 32 466.5 11423.25 14.578125 1 32 32 32 466.5 11423.25 32 466.5 1 D² 2 2 2 = = = = - - = - - = - å - = å n n n D t D commit to user 156 t-tes of non independent Between Pre-test and Post-test S.N Pre-test Post-test D D² 1 49 78 29 841 2 53 80 27 729 3 47 80 33 1089 4 57.5 80 22.5 506.25 5 52 77.5 25.5 650.25 6 46 78 32 1024 7 53 80 27 729 8 50.5 77.5 27 729 9 50.5 80 29.5 870.25 10 45 73 28 784 11 48 80 32 1024 12 49 80 31 961 13 49.5 70.5 21 441 14 53 76.5 23.5 552.25 15 61 80 19 361 16 56 77.5 21.5 462.25 17 51.5 77 25.5 650.25 18 48 80 32 1024 19 57 80 23 529 20 66 89 23 529 21 50.5 77.5 27 729 22 65 90 25 625 23 47.5 77 29.5 870.25 24 48 78 30 900 25 49 72 23 529 26 52 77.5 25.5 650.25 27 51 78 27 729 28 53 80 27 729 29 55.5 72.5 17 289 30 46 80.5 34.5 1190.25 31 51 73.5 22.5 506.25 32 50 80 30 900 ∑ 1661 2511 850 23132.5 commit to user 157 t-test of non independent between Pre-test and Post-test Because t o 3 35.5322709 is higher than t t 31, 0,05 1.960 or t o t t , it can be concluded that there is a significant different between the result of the Pre-test and the Post-test. 3 35.5322709 5 0.74755987 26.5625 6 0.55884576 26.5625 992 554.375 26.5625 1 32 32 32 5 . 439 23132.5 26.5625 1 32 32 32 5 . 439 23132.5 32 850 1 D² 2 2 2 = = = = - - = - - = - å - = å n n n D t D commit to user 158 QUESTIONAIRES BEFORE TREATMENT TO THE STUDENTS KUISIONER UNTUK SISWA SEBELUM PERLAKUAN Name …………………………………… Class:…………………………………… What difficulties do you still finding in writing a procedure text? a. In understanding lexical meaning b. In understanding contextual meaning c. In choosing words d. In applying words in a sentence e. In spelling f. In redundant information g. In using the parts of speech h. In arranging the sentence i. In using punctuation j. In using preposition k. In using articles l. In Exploring ideas m. In applying generic structure: goal, materialequipment, and steps. n. In applying language features: 1. In using imperative verbs 2. In using action verb 3. In using connective to arrange the activities 4. In using adverbial to show the time, place, and accurate step 4. List other difficulties and why it is difficult …………………………………………………………………………. ………………………………………………………………………… 5. Write what you hope or want in writing class. ………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………… commit to user 159 Recapitulation of Students’ Difficulties in writing Procedure Texts before Treatment No Difficulties in Writing Procedure Texts Number of Students Percentage a. In understanding lexical meaning 30 94 b. In understanding contextual meaning 32 100 c. In choosing words 28 88 d. In applying words in a sentence 24 75 e. In spelling 24 75 f. In redundant information 21 66 g. In using the parts of speech 25 78 h. In arranging the sentence 27 84 i. In using punctuation 17 53 j. In using preposition 23 72 k. In using articles 26 81 l. In Exploring ideas 29 91 m. In applying generic structure: goal, material, and steps. 27 84 n. In applying language features: 1 In using imperative verbs 21 66 2 In using action verb 20 63 3 In using connective to arrange the activities 24 75 4 In using adverbial to show the time, place, and accurate steps. 23 72 commit to user 160 QUESTIONAIRES AFTER TREATMENT TO THE STUDENTS KUISIONER UNTUK SISWA SETELAH PERLAKUAN Jawablah setiap pertanyaan di bawah ini dengan cara menyilang huruf a, b, atau c. tanpa dipengaruhi oleh siapapun. 1. Apakah anda dapat memahami pesan dari setiap gambar yang diberikan? a. Ya b. Tidak c. Tidak tahu 2. Apkah anda dapat mengidentifikasi unsur generic structure dan language feature teks prosedur? a. Ya b. Tidak c. Tidak tahu 3. Apakah dengan menggunakan gambar berseri pemahaman anda tentang unsur generic structure dan language feature teks prosedur lebih jelas? a. Ya b. Tidak c. Tidak tahu 4. Apakah anda dapat menyusun teks prosedur berdasarkan gambar berseri? a. Ya b. Tidak c. Tidak tahu 5. Apakah dengan menggunakan gambar berseri anda lebih mudah menyusun teks prosedur? a. Ya b. Tidak c. Tidak tahu 6. Apakah anda merasa senang menggunakan gambar berseri untuk mempelajari dan menyusun teks prosedur? a. Ya b. Tidak c. Tidak tahu Kesan dan pesan: commit to user 161 Recapitulation of students’ Questionnaire Answers after Treatment Rekapitulasi hasil jawaban kuisioner siswa setelah perlakuan No Pertanyaan Ya Kadang- kadang Tidak Tidak tahu 1 Apakah anda dapat memahami pesan dari setiap gambar yang diberikan? 31 1 96.875 3.125 2 Apakah anda dapat mengidentifikasi unsur generic structure dan language feature teks procedure? 32 100 3 Apakah denggan menggunakan gambar berseri pemahaman anda tentang unsur generic structure dan language feature teks prosedur lebih jelas? 32 100 4 Apkah anda dapat menyusun teks prosedur berdasarkan gambar berseri? 32 100 5 Apakah dengan menggunakan gambar berseri anda lebih mudah menyusun teks prosedur? 32 100 6 Apakah anda merasa senang menggunakan gambar berseri untuk mempelajari dan menyusun teks prosedur? 32 100 commit to user 162 Pedoman wawancara dengan guru The interview guidance to the teacher Hal-hal yang ditanyakan dalam wawancara adalah sebagai berikut: 1. Pembelajaran bahasa Inggris di kelas IX A MTs NW 1 Kembang Kerang pada umumnya. 2. Metode pengajaran yang digunakan untuk mengajar menulis teks. 3. Respon siswa ketika menulis teks. 4. Kemampuan siswa dalam menulis teks 5. Kesulitan siswa dalam menulis teks 6. Siswa yang menonjol khususnya untuk mata pelajaran bahasa Inggris. 7. Siswa yang perlu perhatian khusus. 8. Pemahaman tentang Genre based approach. Pedoman waancara dengan siswa The interview guidance to the students Hal-hal yang ditanyakan dalam wawancara adalah sebagai berikut 1. Sikap siswa terhadap pelajaran bahasa Inggris 2. Perasaan siswa ketika diminta menulis teks 3. Kesulitan siswa dalam menulis teks 4. Pengajaran yang diinginkan siswa khususnya untuk menulis teks 5. Respon siswa terhadap pembelajaran bahasa Inggris yang diikuti 6. Pemahaman siswa terhadap materi yang disampaikan Adapted from “Penelitian dan Penilaian Pendidikan, Nana Sudjana, 2009: 102 commit to user 163 Hasil wawancara sebelum perlakuan dengan guru The result of interview before treatment to the teacher Daydate : Saturday, 29th of Jan. 2011 Interviewer X : Muhammad Zaini, S.Pd Interviewee Y : Shabrin, SS X :Good morning, pak Shabrin. Y : Good morning, pak . Ada yang bisa saya bantu, pak? X : Maaf pak, bisa mengganggu sebentar? Y : Oh silahkan, as long as I can. X : Gimana kesan pak Shabrin mengajar di kelas IX A? T : Biasa-biasa aja pak. Bapak kan maklum tidak seperti di sekolah negeri. X : Sudah pernah ngasi materi writing pada mereka, pak? Y : Sudah pak, sekali kalau nggak salah. X : Hanya sekali doang? Kok bisa begitu pak? Y : Ya, gimana lagi pak, kita kan dituntut ngejar tayang materi. X : Gimana tanggapan mereka ketika saudara ngasi materi menulis? Y : Dingin responnya, terutama pada saat saya meminta mereka untuk menulis teks. X : Gimana pak hasil writing mereka? Y : Ya, begitulah, sangat kurang pak. X : Pak, untuk pengajaran writing, tehnik apa yang pak Shabrin berikan? Y : Ya, saya berikan contoh, kemudian saya jelaskan dan memberikan mereka beberapa latihan. commit to user 164 X : Cara penilaiannya gimana pak? Y : Saya hanya memfokuskan pada isi dan grammarnya saja pak X : Kesulitan yang mereka rasakan dalam menulis apa pak? Y : Cara memulai menulis, kosa kata terbatas, cara merangkai kata-kata menjadi paragraf, kesulitan mengembangkan ide. X : Untuk grammarnya pak? Y : Ya masih payah, pak X : Pak Shabrin, bisa nggak nyebutin siswa yang bagus Inggrisnya. Y : Muhammad Zainuddin, panggilannya Ceng. X : Kalau yang perlu mendapatkan perhatian,siapa saja? Y : Ismail, pak. X : Ma’af pak, gimana cara saudara menyampaikan materi bahasa Inggris? Y : Saya masih memakai cara konvensional, kok pak. X :Pak, sudah pernah menyampaikan materi dengan genre based approach? Y : Saya belum begitu paham dengan itu, pak tapi untungnya buku yang saya pakai banyak membantu untuk memahaminya. X : Oke Pak, terimakasih atas waktu dan kesediaannya untuk berbagi. commit to user 165 Hasil wawancara sebelum perlakuan dengan siswa The result of interview before treatment to the students Daydate : Sunday, 7 th of February 2011 Interviewer Guru : Muhammad Zaini Interviewee Siswa : 1.Muhammad ZainuddinEceng 2.Muhyidin 3.Suharno 1. Guru dengan Muhammad Zainuddin Eceng Guru : Assalamualaikum Ceng, bisa ngobrol sebentar? Siswa : Ada apa ya pak? Guru : Ceng, suka nggak pelajaran bahasa Inggris? Siswa : suka, pak. Guru : materi pelajaran bahasa Inggras itu kan banyak, ada listening, speaking, writing, reading, grammar, dan masih ada yang lainnya. Yang mana yang kamu anggap paling sulit? Siswa : Writing pak. Guru : Kesulitanmu di apanya? Siswa : Terus terang pak, saya itu ndak suka nulis pak, dan kesulitan saya ketika nulis adalah cara memulai nulis pak, kosa kata saya cuma sedikit dan cara merangkai kata-kata saya juga bingung grammar saya juga payah. Guru : Kalau untuk menemukan ide sulit nggak? Siswa : Wah itu malah yang lebih sulit lagi, karna saya betul-betul tidak terbiasa menulis, pak. commit to user 166 Guru : lha terus gimana caranya supaya menulis itu jadi mudah, menurutmu? Siswa : Ya dikasi contoh dulu, dikasi tahu caranya, lalu dikasi latihan yang cukup, pak. Guru : Ya sudah, besok kita coba saranmu, terima kasih waktunya nak. Siswa : Sama-sama pak.

2. Guru dengan Muhyidin

Dokumen yang terkait

DEVELOPING THE WRITING ABILITY OF THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMP NEGERI 2 RAMBIPUJI JEMBER IN THE 2004 / 2005 ACADEMIC YEAR BY USING PICTURE IN SERIES CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH REPORT

0 4 69

EMPLOYING QUESTION – ANSWER RELATIONSHIPS (QAR) STRATEGY TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION (A Classroom Action Research at the Eleventh Year Students of SMA Negeri 1 Rangkasbitung in 2012/2013 Academic Year)

5 22 256

USING A FOUR PHASE TECHNIQUE TO IMPROVE THE STUDENTS’ IMAGINATIVE WRITING SKILLS (A Classroom Action Research at the Eleventh Grade Students of SMA Negeri 2 Sukoharjo in the Academic Year of 20092

0 12 177

THE USE OF MIND MAPPING AND PEER EDITING TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL (A Classroom Action Research Conducted at the Tenth Grade Students of SMA N I Karanganyar in the Academic Year of 2010 2011)

0 2 88

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL USING EDUBLOG (A Classroom Action Research at the Tenth Grade of SMA Negeri 1 Boyolali in the Academic Year of 2010 2011)

0 0 126

USING PEER-EDITING TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL Using Peer-Editing To Improve Students’ Writing Skill (A Classroom Action Research at the Second Year of SMK Negeri 1 Pati in 2010/2011 Academic Year).

0 2 14

INTRODUCTION Using Peer-Editing To Improve Students’ Writing Skill (A Classroom Action Research at the Second Year of SMK Negeri 1 Pati in 2010/2011 Academic Year).

0 0 10

USING PEER EDITING TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL (A Classroom Action Research at the Second Year of SMK Negeri 1 Pati Using Peer-Editing To Improve Students’ Writing Skill (A Classroom Action Research at the Second Year of SMK Negeri 1 Pati in 2010

0 2 16

IMPROVING THE STUDENTS’ WRITING ABILITY BY USING PEER EXCHANGE (A Classroom Action Research at the Third Semester of English Department Students of IKIP PGRI Madiun in the Academic Year of 2010/2011).

0 0 15

USING CONCEPT MAP TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ WRITING ABILITY I TEACHING RECOUNT TEXT (A Classroom Action Research at the VIII B Grade Students at SMP IT Harapan Ummat in Academic Year 20152016)

0 0 14