Quantitative data Data Collection Technique

commit to user 44 A questionnaire is used especially as a means of collecting information from a wider sample that can not be reached by personal interview. The purpose of giving a questionnaire is to find out the students’ personal opinion of self expression. In the preliminary observation, the researcher used questionnaire to know the students’ process in writing and problems faced by the students in writing. In the end of the research, the researcher used a questionnaire to know the students’ responses and to know the implementation of picture series in writing.

2. Quantitative data

In this phase, the researcher used written products of the writing to measure the students’ achievement in writing. He gave the pre-test and the post- test to know the students’ writing ability before and after teaching writing using picture series media. Its aim is to know whether the students’ writing ability is improving or not. Brown 2001: 358 states that “if the teachers still need to assign a single grade or score to each paper, and then consider weighting the first few categories more heavily”. The researcher applies the analytic method that components of writing are scored separately based on the purpose of composition such as ideas or content, organization, words choice, and convention. The researcher can thereby emphasize the content-based flavour of their evaluation. Madsen 1983: 120 states that “there are basically two ways to give a formal grade to a piece of writing. One is called analytical, and the other holistic. In this, commit to user 45 the researcher takes analytical method which attempts to evaluate separately the various components of piece of writing, where students begin with 100 points or an A grade. Then they lose points or fractions of a grade for errors that occur in their piece of writing. The distribution score of the writing is illustrated in the table below: Table. 2 Scoring Rubric of Writing Test Writing elements Range score Scale Maximum Score Organization 1-5 6 30 Content 1-5 5 25 Grammar 1-5 4 20 Vocabulary 1-5 3 15 Mechanics 1-5 2 10 Total score 100 Adapted from Techniques in Testing, Evaluating Students’ Writing Harold S. Madsen, 1983: 119 There are five elements to score in scoring the students’ work. They are organization, content, grammar, vocabulary, and mechanics. The value of each element ranged from 1 to 5. The scale of organization is six, the scale of content is five, the scale of grammar is four, the scale of vocabulary is three, and the scale of mechanics is two. So, the total score of each element is different. The total score of organization is 30, the total score of content is 25, the total score of grammar is commit to user 46 20, the total score of vocabulary is 15, and the total score of mechanics is 10. The maximum score is 100 derived from the sum of the maximum score of each element. Test instruction which was given to Class IX A Research subject was measured by conducting test at different students Class IX B, it was done to know the readability of the test, the students could understand the test. In this case, Weir 1998: 58 says: In testing writing, there are two different approaches for assessing writing ability that can be adopted. Firstly, writing can be divided into discrete levels, e.g. grammar, vocabulary, spelling, and punctuation, and these elements can be tested separately by the use of the objective test. Secondly, more direct extended writing tasks of various types could be constructed. These would have greater construct, content, face, and wash back validity but would require a more subjective assessment.

F. Data Analysis Technique

Dokumen yang terkait

DEVELOPING THE WRITING ABILITY OF THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMP NEGERI 2 RAMBIPUJI JEMBER IN THE 2004 / 2005 ACADEMIC YEAR BY USING PICTURE IN SERIES CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH REPORT

0 4 69

EMPLOYING QUESTION – ANSWER RELATIONSHIPS (QAR) STRATEGY TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION (A Classroom Action Research at the Eleventh Year Students of SMA Negeri 1 Rangkasbitung in 2012/2013 Academic Year)

5 22 256

USING A FOUR PHASE TECHNIQUE TO IMPROVE THE STUDENTS’ IMAGINATIVE WRITING SKILLS (A Classroom Action Research at the Eleventh Grade Students of SMA Negeri 2 Sukoharjo in the Academic Year of 20092

0 12 177

THE USE OF MIND MAPPING AND PEER EDITING TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL (A Classroom Action Research Conducted at the Tenth Grade Students of SMA N I Karanganyar in the Academic Year of 2010 2011)

0 2 88

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL USING EDUBLOG (A Classroom Action Research at the Tenth Grade of SMA Negeri 1 Boyolali in the Academic Year of 2010 2011)

0 0 126

USING PEER-EDITING TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL Using Peer-Editing To Improve Students’ Writing Skill (A Classroom Action Research at the Second Year of SMK Negeri 1 Pati in 2010/2011 Academic Year).

0 2 14

INTRODUCTION Using Peer-Editing To Improve Students’ Writing Skill (A Classroom Action Research at the Second Year of SMK Negeri 1 Pati in 2010/2011 Academic Year).

0 0 10

USING PEER EDITING TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL (A Classroom Action Research at the Second Year of SMK Negeri 1 Pati Using Peer-Editing To Improve Students’ Writing Skill (A Classroom Action Research at the Second Year of SMK Negeri 1 Pati in 2010

0 2 16

IMPROVING THE STUDENTS’ WRITING ABILITY BY USING PEER EXCHANGE (A Classroom Action Research at the Third Semester of English Department Students of IKIP PGRI Madiun in the Academic Year of 2010/2011).

0 0 15

USING CONCEPT MAP TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ WRITING ABILITY I TEACHING RECOUNT TEXT (A Classroom Action Research at the VIII B Grade Students at SMP IT Harapan Ummat in Academic Year 20152016)

0 0 14