Cycle II Planning Cycle I

commit to user 73

6. Cycle II

2. Planning

Based on the reflection in the previous cycle, the researcher set some activities that were going to be done for the second cycle. In this part, the researcher did many kinds of activities in the second cycle namely; sharing idea with the collaborator, designing treatment, interviewing the students, and giving worksheet to the students. a. Sharing ideas with the collaborator The researcher shared ideas with the collaborator in order to obtain the data needed and to make the researcher and the teaching-learning process activities run well. There were a lot of things discussed with the collaborator such as; lesson plan, teaching-aids, and students’ worksheet. He also explained his roles in this research as follows: 1 participating in designing the lesson plan: 2 observing what happens in the classroom while the treatment is given to the students: 3 giving suggestion for the improvement of the next classroom: and 5 scoring the students’ work in every cycle. b. Interviewing the students The researcher interviewed the students before he did the treatment in the second cycle in order to obtain enough information about them. The interview concerned with their difficulties faced in the first cycle and how they solved their problems. The researcher also interviewed them about their response toward the commit to user 74 teaching-learning process activities they joined in the first cycle. Their answers would help the researcher make plans to give treatment in the second cycle in order to try to solve their problems. c. Designing treatment This action plan was the revision of the result of the first cycle to improve the students’ achievement in the second cycle. The solution offered by the researcher were: 1 using Picture Series PS as effective as possible and as interesting as possible in order to make students happy during the teaching learning process: 2 giving the students assistance to explore and express their ideas to construct a procedure text so that they did not get frustrated to do it: 3 trying to change the teacher-centered learning to the student-centered learning, and 4 giving them more opportunities to speak up. The plan of the second cycle was constructed as follows: 1 Explaining the procedure text in detail using real objects in order to get a clear explanation of what a procedure text was. Ask them to do more exercises. 2 Determining the materials which would be presented in the second cycle: that is how to make an apple juice. 3 Preparing the things needed to present the teaching material. 4 Asking the students to do more exercises dealing with grammar. commit to user 75 5 Approaching them or being closer to them and giving more assistance, and attention to them and giving more opportunities to the students to have interaction between them students- centered.

3. Implementation of the action

Dokumen yang terkait

DEVELOPING THE WRITING ABILITY OF THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMP NEGERI 2 RAMBIPUJI JEMBER IN THE 2004 / 2005 ACADEMIC YEAR BY USING PICTURE IN SERIES CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH REPORT

0 4 69

EMPLOYING QUESTION – ANSWER RELATIONSHIPS (QAR) STRATEGY TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION (A Classroom Action Research at the Eleventh Year Students of SMA Negeri 1 Rangkasbitung in 2012/2013 Academic Year)

5 22 256

USING A FOUR PHASE TECHNIQUE TO IMPROVE THE STUDENTS’ IMAGINATIVE WRITING SKILLS (A Classroom Action Research at the Eleventh Grade Students of SMA Negeri 2 Sukoharjo in the Academic Year of 20092

0 12 177

THE USE OF MIND MAPPING AND PEER EDITING TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL (A Classroom Action Research Conducted at the Tenth Grade Students of SMA N I Karanganyar in the Academic Year of 2010 2011)

0 2 88

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL USING EDUBLOG (A Classroom Action Research at the Tenth Grade of SMA Negeri 1 Boyolali in the Academic Year of 2010 2011)

0 0 126

USING PEER-EDITING TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL Using Peer-Editing To Improve Students’ Writing Skill (A Classroom Action Research at the Second Year of SMK Negeri 1 Pati in 2010/2011 Academic Year).

0 2 14

INTRODUCTION Using Peer-Editing To Improve Students’ Writing Skill (A Classroom Action Research at the Second Year of SMK Negeri 1 Pati in 2010/2011 Academic Year).

0 0 10

USING PEER EDITING TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL (A Classroom Action Research at the Second Year of SMK Negeri 1 Pati Using Peer-Editing To Improve Students’ Writing Skill (A Classroom Action Research at the Second Year of SMK Negeri 1 Pati in 2010

0 2 16

IMPROVING THE STUDENTS’ WRITING ABILITY BY USING PEER EXCHANGE (A Classroom Action Research at the Third Semester of English Department Students of IKIP PGRI Madiun in the Academic Year of 2010/2011).

0 0 15

USING CONCEPT MAP TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ WRITING ABILITY I TEACHING RECOUNT TEXT (A Classroom Action Research at the VIII B Grade Students at SMP IT Harapan Ummat in Academic Year 20152016)

0 0 14