Second Meeting Implementation of the action

commit to user 59 comparison of their feeling before and after being taught using PS in writing a procedure text. Most of them said that PS was very helpful to construct a procedure text since they only had to organize the words based on PS to become a procedure text. The researcher said good bye, and reminded them to study harder and to do more exercises.

b. Second Meeting

In this phase, the researcher did the teaching-learning process as follows: Modeling of Text, Join Construction of Text, and Independent Construction of Text. The researcher expected that the students had more practice to compose or write a procedure text. They were also expected to be able to list the words which they had learned. 1 Modeling of Text On February 22nd, 2011 at 08:20 am, the bell rang at the third period. The researcher and collaborator entered the classroom. The collaborator directly took a seat in the back row while the researcher led the class. He started the lesson by asking the students’ condition. Teacher : “How are you doing, today?” he asked Students : “I’m fine, thanks” they replied “What about you, sir?” they asked Teacher : “I’m very well, thank you” he answered After that, the researcher asked them who were absent. There were 2 students absent. There were 30 students present. Then, he asked them what they had learned at the previous lesson. commit to user 60 Surprisingly, there was a student who wanted to answer the teacher’ question and he answered the teacher correctly. In short, it could be said that the students had understood what a procedure text was. Then, the researcher told them what they were going to do. The researcher gave them a procedure text entitled “The basic operation of a digital camera”, then, he asked them to analyze it. After that, they had to list and classify the words based on its generic structure and language features. 2 Joint Construction of Text In this phase, the first thing the students did was making a group which consists of four students to do a group project that was making a procedure text of how to make a bowl of fried-noodle based on PS given in group which consisted of goals, materials, equipmentstools, and steps or procedures. The researcher started to form groups of four and five students by asking them to mention sequences of pictures from number one until number seven according to their own turn. Then, he let them to find the group members based on their own number. The students who got the same number formed groups of four and five students. So, there were seven groups consisting of four groups that had five members, and three groups that had four members. Afterwards, he told them how to do the group project. First of all, they had to pay attention to PS in which they had to put all the words used to make a bowl of fried-noodle. Then, they had to arrange the words based on PS to become a procedure text. Finally, they had to present the result of their group discussion in front of the class, represented by one of the group members. They were given commit to user 61 twenty minutes to finish their work. They did the group project enthusiastically and seriously. They helped one another to finish it. Time was up and it was time for the students to present the result of their discussion in front of the class. Then, the researcher called one of the representatives of the group to present the result of the discussion. They were given 5 minutes to present it. Basically, they had done what the researcher instructed to do well. However, there was still mistake they made. They forgot to elaborate the materials in making a bowl of fried-noodle.

c. Third meeting

Dokumen yang terkait

DEVELOPING THE WRITING ABILITY OF THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMP NEGERI 2 RAMBIPUJI JEMBER IN THE 2004 / 2005 ACADEMIC YEAR BY USING PICTURE IN SERIES CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH REPORT

0 4 69

EMPLOYING QUESTION – ANSWER RELATIONSHIPS (QAR) STRATEGY TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION (A Classroom Action Research at the Eleventh Year Students of SMA Negeri 1 Rangkasbitung in 2012/2013 Academic Year)

5 22 256

USING A FOUR PHASE TECHNIQUE TO IMPROVE THE STUDENTS’ IMAGINATIVE WRITING SKILLS (A Classroom Action Research at the Eleventh Grade Students of SMA Negeri 2 Sukoharjo in the Academic Year of 20092

0 12 177

THE USE OF MIND MAPPING AND PEER EDITING TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL (A Classroom Action Research Conducted at the Tenth Grade Students of SMA N I Karanganyar in the Academic Year of 2010 2011)

0 2 88

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL USING EDUBLOG (A Classroom Action Research at the Tenth Grade of SMA Negeri 1 Boyolali in the Academic Year of 2010 2011)

0 0 126

USING PEER-EDITING TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL Using Peer-Editing To Improve Students’ Writing Skill (A Classroom Action Research at the Second Year of SMK Negeri 1 Pati in 2010/2011 Academic Year).

0 2 14

INTRODUCTION Using Peer-Editing To Improve Students’ Writing Skill (A Classroom Action Research at the Second Year of SMK Negeri 1 Pati in 2010/2011 Academic Year).

0 0 10

USING PEER EDITING TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL (A Classroom Action Research at the Second Year of SMK Negeri 1 Pati Using Peer-Editing To Improve Students’ Writing Skill (A Classroom Action Research at the Second Year of SMK Negeri 1 Pati in 2010

0 2 16

IMPROVING THE STUDENTS’ WRITING ABILITY BY USING PEER EXCHANGE (A Classroom Action Research at the Third Semester of English Department Students of IKIP PGRI Madiun in the Academic Year of 2010/2011).

0 0 15

USING CONCEPT MAP TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ WRITING ABILITY I TEACHING RECOUNT TEXT (A Classroom Action Research at the VIII B Grade Students at SMP IT Harapan Ummat in Academic Year 20152016)

0 0 14