Third meeting Implementation of the action

commit to user 61 twenty minutes to finish their work. They did the group project enthusiastically and seriously. They helped one another to finish it. Time was up and it was time for the students to present the result of their discussion in front of the class. Then, the researcher called one of the representatives of the group to present the result of the discussion. They were given 5 minutes to present it. Basically, they had done what the researcher instructed to do well. However, there was still mistake they made. They forgot to elaborate the materials in making a bowl of fried-noodle.

c. Third meeting

Independent Construction of Text On February 23rd, 2011, at 07:00 am. In this phase, the researcher expected that the students would be able to construct a procedure text since he had explained it clearly and they had got enough experience of how to construct a procedure text. Then, the researcher asked them to tell how to make or to do something they liked. He also told them that they were allowed to open their dictionary. The teacher, however, reminded them not to cheat. They were given twenty minutes to finish their work. The researcher moved around the class while they were doing the work. He wanted to make sure that nobody cheated. The situation of the class was a bit quiet. Some of the students did not know what to do since they got confused to choose the title of their procedure text. Once, the researcher asked one of them, “Why did not you start to write yet, boy?”. He just gave him a smile. Then, he answered “ Saya masih ragu mengenai proses apa yang akan saya tulis, pak “What about you, Hib?” he asked. “Baru dapat sedikit, pak. “Ya sudah, silahkan dilanjutkan” While he was moving commit to user 62 around, he reminded them that they only had five minutes to go. Some of them had finished it, then, they submitted their works while others were still finishing their works. Finally, they all finished their works on time. Before ending the class, the researcher asked the students whether the project given was difficult or not. Most of them said that they could construct a procedure text and picture series helped them much to put the ideas on. While others felt a bit difficult. They still got difficulties in organizing the words to become a text. The researcher tried to accommodate their difficulties in order to be able to give them a way out. Then, the researcher advised them to have more practice and reading. “Any more question, class?” the researcher asked “nothing, sir” one student said. Ok then, “if there is no more question”, the researcher said good bye, he also reminded them to study harder and to do more exercises.

3. Observation of the Action

Dokumen yang terkait

DEVELOPING THE WRITING ABILITY OF THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMP NEGERI 2 RAMBIPUJI JEMBER IN THE 2004 / 2005 ACADEMIC YEAR BY USING PICTURE IN SERIES CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH REPORT

0 4 69

EMPLOYING QUESTION – ANSWER RELATIONSHIPS (QAR) STRATEGY TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION (A Classroom Action Research at the Eleventh Year Students of SMA Negeri 1 Rangkasbitung in 2012/2013 Academic Year)

5 22 256

USING A FOUR PHASE TECHNIQUE TO IMPROVE THE STUDENTS’ IMAGINATIVE WRITING SKILLS (A Classroom Action Research at the Eleventh Grade Students of SMA Negeri 2 Sukoharjo in the Academic Year of 20092

0 12 177

THE USE OF MIND MAPPING AND PEER EDITING TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL (A Classroom Action Research Conducted at the Tenth Grade Students of SMA N I Karanganyar in the Academic Year of 2010 2011)

0 2 88

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL USING EDUBLOG (A Classroom Action Research at the Tenth Grade of SMA Negeri 1 Boyolali in the Academic Year of 2010 2011)

0 0 126

USING PEER-EDITING TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL Using Peer-Editing To Improve Students’ Writing Skill (A Classroom Action Research at the Second Year of SMK Negeri 1 Pati in 2010/2011 Academic Year).

0 2 14

INTRODUCTION Using Peer-Editing To Improve Students’ Writing Skill (A Classroom Action Research at the Second Year of SMK Negeri 1 Pati in 2010/2011 Academic Year).

0 0 10

USING PEER EDITING TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL (A Classroom Action Research at the Second Year of SMK Negeri 1 Pati Using Peer-Editing To Improve Students’ Writing Skill (A Classroom Action Research at the Second Year of SMK Negeri 1 Pati in 2010

0 2 16

IMPROVING THE STUDENTS’ WRITING ABILITY BY USING PEER EXCHANGE (A Classroom Action Research at the Third Semester of English Department Students of IKIP PGRI Madiun in the Academic Year of 2010/2011).

0 0 15

USING CONCEPT MAP TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ WRITING ABILITY I TEACHING RECOUNT TEXT (A Classroom Action Research at the VIII B Grade Students at SMP IT Harapan Ummat in Academic Year 20152016)

0 0 14