32 percentage which was 50, it means that components of classroom management
were balanced. The last step, the data would be analyzed later by elaborating it with the
data gained through the guiding questions for interview, observation, and observation note.
While the data from open-ended questionnaire were employed to gather information from the student teachers. They were functioned to find out the
reasons why the ELESP student teachers did not conduct the components of classroom management during the teaching. Besides, the data would be presented
in Chapter IV.
3. Data from the Guiding Questions for Interview
The next step was the data from the guiding questions for interview. The result of the guiding questions for the interview provided the result of the
differences between the data of observation checklist and questionnaire. The data gained through the guiding questions for interview would be analyzed to ensure
that the data of the researcher were correct and to gain more information from the respondents on different data. Then, the researcher presented the result in table
form. The researcher listed what components of classroom management were conducted and which were not conducted by the ELESP student teachers. The
components of classroom management which were conducted by the respondents were marked by check v mark and the components of classroom management
which were not conducted by the respondents were marked by cross x mark.
33 Afterwards, the result of it would be presented into a table as in Table 3.5. The
Guiding Question for Interview Results 1.
Table 3.5 The Guiding Question for Interview Results 1
No. Component of Classroom Management
Respondent 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1. Content Management:
a……….. b………..
c…………
2. Conduct Management:
a………. b……….
c……….
3. Covenant Management
a……….. b………..,etc
After obtaining the data in form of table, the researcher counted how many respondents conducted components of classroom management and who did not
conduct on every component into percentage using formula below. Further, it would be presented in form of table as in Table 3.6 The Blank Table for Guiding
Question for Interview and in form of figure. 1
∑a ×100= ∑n
2 ∑b ×100=
∑n ∑ : Total
a : The number of respondents who conducted the components of classroom management
b : The number of respondents who did not conduct the components of classroom management
n : The number of respondents
34
Table 3.6 the Blank Table for Guiding Questions for Interview
No. Components of
Classroom Management
Percentage Conducted
not Conducted Total
Total 1.
… 55.
…
Having all the data in form of percentage, then the researcher formulated those components of classroom managements namely conducted and not
conducted. Those components of classroom managements were conducted during teaching activities if the percentage of check v mark was more than 50. While
having the percentage of cross x mark was more than 50, the researcher concluded that the components of classroom management were not conducted
during the teaching activity. Despite the fact that there were the same results or percentage which was 50, it means that components of classroom management
were balanced. Having all the data required, the last thing the researcher analyzed was
about the final result on the classroom management conducted by the ELESP student teachers. In addition, the researcher also analyzed the classroom
management problems that occur in the student teachers teaching practice which was supported by observation note and open-ended parts. Furthermore, the main
data in the research were the observation data. While the result of questionnaire and the interview, they were as the supporting data to strengthen the observation
result.
35
F. Research Procedure
