Result of the Product Testing UNIT 1 “Come with Us” Expert Judgment Result
87
It can be seen that the mean of the appropriateness for the content of Unit 1 was in the range of
2.25 ≤ x ≤ 3.24 which can be categorized as Good. The topic of the unit was the expression inviting someone and declining invitation. The chosen
topic was considered relevant and appropriate to the standard competence and students‟ daily lives.
SMA Grade X 1.1 offering invitation, accepting and cancelling invitation
2 The learning materials are related to the students‟
daily life context 3
3 The learning materials text, pictures and table are
relevant with the topic discussed in the unit 3
4 The learning materials are related to the 10
th
grade students‟ needs
3 5
The learning are up to date 3
6 The use of the learning materials are related to
students‟ life 3
7 The learning materials
are related to the students‟ life skills
3 8
The materials are consisted with many expressions which are appropriate with students‟ needs
3 9
The materials are related to the social function of the expression and text discussed
3 10
The learning materials are aimed to make the students understand about the use of the expression
in their life 3
11 The learning materials focus on the linguistic
features and the grammatical aspect of the text 3
Mean 3
88
b. The Appropriateness of the Developed Materials‟ Presentation
Table 11.2 The Result of Designed Materials ‟ Presentation Judgment
The second aspect to evaluate was the appropriateness of the presentation of the developed materials. The presentation has a mean of 3.4 which in the range of
3.25 ≤ x ≤ 4. The aspect presentation such as the organization of tasks was considered as Very Good by the expert.
Item Number Statement Score
12 The task sequences are arranged systematically,
from the easiest task to the difficult ones 3
13 The tasks in each part are balance
3 14
The aim of the task arrangement focuses on communication in oral form
3 15
The tasks guide students to enhance their creative thinking
3 16
The tasks help students to work individually 3
17 The tasks are arranged systematically based on the
REACT theory relating, experiencing, applying, cooperating and transferring
4
18 The
tasks consist of the students‟ skill evaluation to measure the students‟ understanding of speaking
materials 4
19 The tasks consist of pre task, task cycle and
language focus. 4
20 The task consist of the vocabulary learning
materials based on the topic 3
21 The tasks consist of the difficult word based on the
topic 4
Mean 3,4
89
c. The Appropriateness of the Developed Materials‟ Language Use
Table 11.3 The Result of Designed Materials‟ Language Appropriateness
Judgment
The third aspect concerned with the language appropriateness. This covered the language of the
materials‟ instructions, texts, questions, and explanations. In terms of language appropriateness the materials need some revision, especially some
grammar mistakes and misspelling. The mean of the third aspect was 2.8 which considered as Good within the range of
2.25 ≤ x ≤ 3.24.
d. The Appropriateness of the Developed Materials Media Table 11.4
The Result of Designed Materials‟ Media Appropriateness Judgment Item Number Statement
Score 22
Students can understand the instruction easily 3
23 The use of the language can improve the students‟
cognitive aspect 3
24 The developed materials in the unit has minimum
grammatical mistakes 2
25 The book uses an appropriate English spelling
words 3
26 The book has an appropriate word choices
3 27
The language focus I each materials are related to the other materials
3 Mean
2,8
Item Number Statement Score
28 The font styles in the materials are appropriate
enough to be used 3
29 The choice of the color is appropriate enough to be
used in the learning materials 3
30 The choice of the pictures are effective and
functional 3
90
The fourth aspect to evaluate was the appropriateness of the layout of the developed materials. Things to evaluate related to the appropriateness of layout
included the fonts used in the materials, pictures and color choice. The mean of the third aspect was 3 which wasconsidered as Good within the range of
2.25 ≤ x ≤ 3.24. In general, Unit 1 of the developed materials was categorized as Good. The
mean of the four aspects was within the interval of 2.25 ≤ x ≤ 3.24. The result was
taken from the mean value of 3.05.