Giving feedback to students’ writing

84 questions to the students. None of the students asked questions. Then, she closed the teaching and learning process and greeted the students.

b. Second meeting of Cycle 2

The second meeting of Cycle 2 was conducted on Tuesday, 17 th February 2015. The teaching and learning process began at 07.15 a.m. The researcher and the English teacher entered VIII A classroom. The English teacher sat on the back on the classroom observing the teaching and learning process while the researcher opened the class and greeted the students. Two students were absent. Then, the researcher told the students today’s learning goal “In this meeting we still study recount text and today we will analyze the generic structure of a recount text. Do you think you can do it?” “Yes, Miss.” Only some students paid attention to the researcher, some others were busy talking with their friends. To get students’ attention, the researcher distributed handout to the students. She asked the students to read carefully the text and analyze the generic structure of the text given. The students were allowed to work in pair and use dictionary. They focused on doing the assignment. The researcher walked around the classroom and helped some students that found difficulties in doing the assignment. Most of the students could finish the assignment quickly. The researcher discussed the answer and the content of the text with the students. All of the students were able to do the assignment correctly. Then, she reminded the students about characteristics of recount text by using the text given. She gave students chance to ask questions related to recount text material. None of the students asked question. 85 Then, she continued explaining simple past tense material. She took some sentences in the text given as examples for the students. She asked to the students whether they had understood the material or not. All students said they had understood the material. The researcher provided the students with another assignment. The students were asked to fill the crossword puzzle. At first, the students were interested to do the assignment but they seemed reluctant to do the assignment after hearing that they had to work individually. To raised students’ interest and motivation, the researcher would give five snacks to five quickest students in finishing the assignment. She would also give a snack for the students who wanted to write the answer in the whiteboard. After all the students had finished their assignment, the researcher asked them to present their answer in the whiteboard. All students seemed uninterested and did not pay attention. Then the researcher said “It is okay if you have wrong answer, you still get one snack . And I will give another snack to whoever can correct your friends’ answer. We will discuss it together.” After that, some students came forward and wrote their answer in the whiteboard. Some of the students write down wrong answers. The researcher and the students discussed the answer together and corrected the wrong answer together. Finally, the time was almost up. The researcher re-explained the simple past tense material and gave the students chance to ask questions. All of the students had no questions. Then, she ended the teaching and learning process.

Dokumen yang terkait

AN ANALYSIS OF GRAMMATICAL ERRORS IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE PARAGRAPH MADE BY THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMP MUHAMMADIYAH 06 DAU MALANG

44 306 18

AN ANALYSIS ON GRAMMATICAL ERROR IN WRITING MADE BY THE TENTH GRADE OF MULTIMEDIA CLASS IN SMK MUHAMMADIYAH 2 MALANG

26 336 20

PENERIMAAN ATLET SILAT TENTANG ADEGAN PENCAK SILAT INDONESIA PADA FILM THE RAID REDEMPTION (STUDI RESEPSI PADA IKATAN PENCAK SILAT INDONESIA MALANG)

43 322 21

REPRESENTASI CITRA PEREMPUAN DALAM IKLAN DI TELEVISI (ANALISIS SEMIOTIK DALAM IKLAN SAMSUNG GALAXY S7 VERSI THE SMARTES7 ALWAYS KNOWS BEST)

132 481 19

KONSTRUKSI MEDIA TENTANG KETERLIBATAN POLITISI PARTAI DEMOKRAT ANAS URBANINGRUM PADA KASUS KORUPSI PROYEK PEMBANGUNAN KOMPLEK OLAHRAGA DI BUKIT HAMBALANG (Analisis Wacana Koran Harian Pagi Surya edisi 9-12, 16, 18 dan 23 Februari 2013 )

64 565 20

ANALISIS PROSES PENYUSUNAN PLAN OF ACTION (POA) PADA TINGKAT PUSKESMAS DI KABUPATEN JEMBER TAHUN 2007

6 120 23

AN ANALYSIS OF DESCRIPTIVE TEXT WRITING COMPOSED BY THE HIGH AND THE LOW ACHIEVERS OF THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMPN SUKORAMBI JEMBER

11 83 16

AN ANALYSIS OF LANGUAGE CONTENT IN THE SYLLABUS FOR ESP COURSE USING ESP APPROACH THE SECRETARY AND MANAGEMENT PROGRAM BUSINESS TRAINING CENTER (BTC) JEMBER IN ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2000 2001

3 95 76

A DESCRIPTIVE STUDY ON THE TENTH YEAR STUDENTS’ RECOUNT TEXT WRITING ABILITY AT MAN 2 SITUBONDO IN THE 2012/2013 ACADEMIC YEAR

5 197 17

A DISCOURSE ANALYSIS ON “SPA: REGAIN BALANCE OF YOUR INNER AND OUTER BEAUTY” IN THE JAKARTA POST ON 4 MARCH 2011

9 161 13