Research Participants RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

26 stage is interpretation and representation. Ary et al 2010 says that “interpretation is about bringing out the meaning, telling the story, providing an explanation, and developing plausible explanation”. The aim of this part was to make generalization based on the same categories and themes from the coding process. In this part the researcher presents the discussion and analysis deductively after conducting inductive inquiry based on the result of the coding. Interpretation is personal and proceeds without set of rules but it is supported by data, so that it does not mean that it is just figment Ary et al, 2010. Therefore, the final product would be in the form of narrative. The way to analyze the data was also through a self perception. It portrayed the students’ improvement in the consistency in world view. It would see how they show stable particular patterns in a year of joining Marvy. The major analysis would be a thick description where the data especially from the FGD would be narrated. The narrative data would show the dynamic movement of the students. It was video-like portrayal not photo-like portrayal. From those ways of analysis, the researcher wanted to get a thicker conclusion.

F. Research Procedure

This part shows the procedure of conducting the research from the beginning until the report of the data. The procedure will be listed as follows: 1. The researcher asked the advisor whether the topic was accepted. 2. The researcher asked for the permission of Marvy’s chairperson to be the object of the survey. 27 3. The researcher found nine members of Marvy. 4. The researcher asked the research participants to come in LPM meeting room on 19 December 2014. 5. The research participants were explained about data gathering technique using De Bono’s six hat thinking packs and the procedure on how it would be conducted. 6. The researcher asked the research participants to sign the informed-consent form. 7. Each of the research participants got a piece of paper to be fulfilled with their feeling including before joining Marvy, after joining Marvy, and their expectation on Marvy’s future. 8. The data gathering was facilitated by the thesis advisor. Mr. X began the FGD and then the researcher continued to handle the rest. 9. The FGD was conducted in non-threatening situation so that all members could share comfortably. 10. The researcher asked the research participants one by one to share what heshe experienced in Marvy. 11. The researcher recorded the discussion and took notes on the important points. 12. The researcher confirmed the things which were said by one participant so that it was valid for other researcher participants’ agreement. 13. The researcher made the transcript of the recording data.