Research Participants RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
26 stage is interpretation and representation. Ary et
al 2010 says that “interpretation is about bringing out the meaning, telling the story, providing an explanation, and
developing plausible explanation”. The aim of this part was to make generalization based on the same categories and themes from the coding process.
In this part the researcher presents the discussion and analysis deductively after conducting inductive inquiry based on the result of the coding. Interpretation is
personal and proceeds without set of rules but it is supported by data, so that it does not mean that it is just figment Ary et al, 2010. Therefore, the final product
would be in the form of narrative. The way to analyze the data was also through a self perception. It
portrayed the students’ improvement in the consistency in world view. It would see how they show stable particular patterns in a year of joining Marvy. The major
analysis would be a thick description where the data especially from the FGD would be narrated. The narrative data would show the dynamic movement of the
students. It was video-like portrayal not photo-like portrayal. From those ways of analysis, the researcher wanted to get a thicker conclusion.