Analisis Perbandingan Algoritma KESIMPULAN DAN SARAN

Dari Tabel 4.1 grafik perbandingan kecepatan waktu metode AHP dan metode SMART dapat dilihat pada Gambar 4.17 . Gambar 4.17. Grafik Kecepatan Waktu Metode AHP dan Metode SMART

4.3 Analisis Perbandingan Algoritma

4.3.1 Perhitungan Kompleksitas Waktu Perhitungan Big θ dilakukan dengan mengambil looping yang terdapat pada code program. Nilai Big θ adalah nilai waktu proses terbesar. 4.3.2 Perhitungan Kompleksitas Waktu Algoritma AHP Perhitungan kompleksitas waktu Algoritma AHP dapat dilihat pada tabel 4.2. Tabel 4.2. Perhitungan Kompleksitas Waktu Algoritma AHP No Code C C 1 Try openConn cmd = New OdbcCommandSELECT COUNT AS jum_kriteria FROM kriteria order by id_kriteria ASC, conn C 1 n C 1 n 2 jum_kriteria = rd.Itemjum_kriteria End Try C 2 1 C 2 2921 7008 15187 315 378 415 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 Pengujian Pertama 3 data Pengujian Kedua 6 data Pengujian Ketiga 10 data Kecepatan Waktu Metode AHP Kecepatan Waktu Metode SMART Universitas Sumatera Utara 3 Try openConn While rd.Read C 3 n C 3 n 4 cmd2 = New OdbcCommandSELECT SUMhasil AS hasil_bobot FROM bobot_perbandingan where id_kriteria2= rd.Itemid_kriteria , conn End While closeConn C 4 n C 4 n 5 Try openConn While rd2.Read C 3 n C 3 n 6 hasil = rd.Itemhasil rd2.Itemnilai_kriteria End While closeConn C 5 n C 5 n 7 Try openConn While rd.Read C 3 n C 3 n 8 cmd2 = New OdbcCommandSELECT SUMhasil_kriteria AS hasil_kriteria FROM total_bobot where id_kriteria1= rd.Itemid_kriteria order by id_kriteria2 ASC, conn C 4 n C 4 n 9 hasil = rd2.Itemhasil_kriteria jum_kriteria End While closeConn C 5 n C 5 n 10 Try openConn While rd3.Read C 3 n C 3 n 11 If rd.Itemid_kriteria = 4 Then hasil_1 = rd3.Itemmatrix_manfaat rd2.Itemmatrix_manfaat End If C 6 n C 6 n 12 If rd.Itemid_kriteria = 5 Then hasil_2 = rd3.Itemmatrix_premi rd2.Itemmatrix_premi End If C 6 n C 6 n 13 If rd.Itemid_kriteria = 6 Then hasil_3 = rd3.Itemmatrix_masa rd2.Itemmatrix_masa End If C 6 n C 6 n 14 If rd.Itemid_kriteria = 7 Then hasil_4 = rd3.Itemmatrix_usia rd2.Itemmatrix_usia End If C 6 n C 6 n 15 If rd.Itemid_kriteria = 9 Then hasil_5 = rd3.Itemmatrix_cara rd2.Itemmatrix_cara End If End While closeConn C 6 n C 6 n 16 Try openConn While rd2.Read C 3 n C 3 n cmd3 = New OdbcCommandSELECT SUMbagi_matrix AS total_matrix FROM matrix_ahp where id_asuransi1= rd2.Itemid_asuransi and id_kriteria = rd.Itemid_kriteria , conn C 4 n C 4 n Universitas Sumatera Utara End While closeConn 17 Try openConn While rd2.Read C 3 n C 3 n 18 hasil_1 = rd2.Itembagi_matrix rd3.Itemhasil_total_bagi End While closeConn End Try C 5 n C 5 n 19 Try openConn cmd = New OdbcCommandSELECT COUNT AS jum_matrix_asuransi FROM matrix_asuransi, conn C 1 n C 1 n 20 jum_matrix_asuransi = rd.Itemjum_matrix_asuransi End Try C 2 1 C 2 21 Try openConn While rd2.Read C 3 n C 3 n 22 cmd3 = New OdbcCommandSELECT SUMhasil_perbandingan AS jumlah_perbandingan FROM total_perbandingan where id_asuransi2= rd2.Itemid_asuransi and id_kriteria = rd.Itemid_kriteria , conn C 4 n C 4 n 23 hasil_1 = rd3.Itemjumlah_perbandingan jum_matrix_asuransi End While closeConn End Try C 5 n C 5 n 24 Try openConn While rd2.Read C 3 n C 3 n 25 hasil_1 = rd2.Itemhasil_eigenfactor rd.Itemnilai_eigen End While closeConn End Try C 5 n C 5 n 26 Try openConn While rd.Read C 3 n C 3 n 27 cmd2 = New OdbcCommandSELECT SUMnilai_eigen AS hasil_ahp FROM total_eigen WHERE id_asuransi= rd.Itemid_asuransi order by id_asuransi ASC, conn End While closeConn End Try C 4 n C 4 n T |n| = 2C 2 n + 2C 1 + 9C 3 + 5C 4 + 4C 5 + 5C 6 n 1 = Ɵ n Universitas Sumatera Utara 4.3.3 Perhitungan Kompleksitas Waktu Algoritma SMART Perhitungan kompleksitas waktu Algoritma SMART dapat dilihat pada tabel 4.3. Tabel 4.3. Perhitungan Kompleksitas Waktu Algoritma SMART No Code C C 1 Try openConn cmd = New OdbcCommandSELECT SUMbobot_penting AS jum_bobot_penting FROM kriteria order by kepentingan ASC, conn C 1 n C 1 n 2 total_bobot_penting = rd.Itemjum_bobot_penting End Try C 2 1 C 2 3 Try openConn cmd = New OdbcCommandSELECT SUMbobot_tidak_penting AS jum_bobot_tidak_penting FROM kriteria order by kepentingan ASC, conn C 1 n C 1 n 4 total_bobot_tidak_penting = rd.Itemjum_bobot_tidak_penting End Try C 2 1 C 2 5 Try openConn While rd.Read C 3 n C 3 n 6 bobot_relatif1 = rd.Itembobot_penting total_bobot_penting C 4 n C 4 n 7 bobot_relatif2 = rd.Itembobot_tidak_penting total_bobot_tidak_penting End While closeConn End Try C 4 n C 4 n 8 Try openConn While rd.Read C 3 n C 3 n 9 nilai_rata = rd.Itembobot_relatif_1 + rd.Itembobot_relatif_2 2 End While closeConn End Try C 5 n C 5 n 10 Try openConn While rd.Read C 3 n C 3 n 11 kali_manfaat = w_manfaat rd.Itemmatrix_manfaat C 6 n C 6 n 12 kali_premi = w_premi rd.Itemmatrix_premi C 6 n C 6 n 13 kali_masa = w_masa rd.Itemmatrix_masa C 6 n C 6 n 14 kali_usia = w_usia rd.Itemmatrix_usia C 6 n C 6 n 15 kali_cara = w_cara rd.Itemmatrix_cara C 6 n C 6 n 16 total_smart = kali_manfaat + kali_premi + kali_masa + kali_usia + kali_cara End While closeConn End Try C 7 n C 7 n T |n| = 2C 2 n + 2C 1 + 3C 3 + 2C 4 + C 5 + 5C 6 + C 7 n 1 = Ɵ n Universitas Sumatera Utara BAB 5 KESIMPULAN DAN SARAN

5.1 Kesimpulan

Dokumen yang terkait

Implementasi Perbandingan Algoritma Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) dengan Algoritma Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) dalam Pemilihan Website Hosting

6 80 130

Analisis Metode Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (Fahp) Dalam Menentukan Posisi Jabatan

12 131 82

Kajian Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) dalam Menentukan Posisi Merek Handphone Berdasarkan Persepsi Produsen dan Konsumen terhadap Kriteria Handphone

2 67 79

Aplikasi Metode Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) dalam Menentukan Keputusan Pemilihan Transportasi Pesawat Udara

4 47 75

Implementasi Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) dan Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making (Fuzzy MADM) dalam Penentuan Prioritas Pengerjaan Order di PT. Sumatera Wood Industry

6 138 175

Analisis Pemilihan Supplier Dengan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) dan Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) di PT. Indo CafCo

12 57 78

Implementasi Metode Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Dan Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Dalam Pemilihan Operator Seluler Terbaik

9 64 118

Analisis Sensitivitas Metode Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique Terhadap Pembobotan Analytic Hierarchy Process

0 0 11

BAB 2 TINJAUAN PUSTAKA 2.1 Asuransi Jiwa - Perbandingan Metode Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) dengan Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique (SMART) dalam Menentukan Perusahaan Asuransi Terbaik

0 0 19

Perbandingan Metode Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) dengan Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique (SMART) dalam Menentukan Perusahaan Asuransi Terbaik

1 1 15