Understanding of Cooperative Learning Type Student Teams
                                                                                results  showed  an  increase  in  each  learning  activity  indicators  from  the first cycle to the second cycle. Reading the subject matter increased from
77.78 into 94.44, a discussion with members of the group in solving a given  problem  increased  from  61.11  into  94.44,  ask  the  teacher  or
friends  increased  from  77.78  into  94.44,  or  respond  to  the  opinion expressed increased from 72.22 into 88.89, helping fellow members of
the group in understanding the subject matter increased from 77.78 into 88.89, recorded or summarizes the subject matter increased from 77.78
into 88.89, working on cases or tasks assigned to work together increase from  77.78  into  94.44.  The  similarities  the  research  above  with  the
research ers’ study lies in the learning model and the type of research, and
the difference is going on the term of time, research setting, and subject of the research.
3. Research  conducted  by  Juwita  Giri  Mukti  2014,  entitled  “The
Implementation  of  Cooperative  Learning  Type  Student  Teams Achievement  Division  STAD  Using  Snakes  and  Ladders  Games  to
Improve Students ’ Learning Motivation and Activities of grade X AK 2 at
SMKN  1  Bantul  Academic  Year  of  2013 2014”.  The  result  showed  an
increase  of  motivation  and  learning  activities.  T he  score  of  students’
learning motivation improved from 76,14 on the cycle 1 into 90,48 on the cycle 2 or improved by 14,34. From questionnaire result, the score of
students’  learning  motivation  improved  from  74,80  on  cycle  1  into 83,06 on cycle
2 or improved by 8,26. Individually, students’ learning
motivation score obtained from observation sheet is 65,62 on the cycle 1 into 93,75 on the cycle 2 or improved by 28,13. Meanwhile, based on
questionnaire  is  65,62  on  the  cycle  1  into  90,62  on  the  cycle  2  or improved by 25. And
the score of students’ learning activities improved from  76,13  on  the  cycle  1  into  89,84  on  the  cycle  2  or  improved  by
13,71.  From  questionnaire  result,  the  score  of  students’  learning activities  improved  from  75,78  on  cycle  1  into  82,03  on  cycle  2  or
improved  by  6,25.  Individually,  students’  learning  activities  score obtained from observation sheet is 68,75 on the cycle 1 into 90,62 on
cycle 2 or improved by 21,87. Meanwhile, based on questionnaire sheet is  71,87  on  the  cycle  1  into  93,75  on  the  cycle  2  or  improved  by
21,88.  The  similarities  the  research  above  with  the  research ers’  study
lies  in  the  learning  model  and  the  type  of  research,  and  the  difference  is going on the term of time, research setting, and subject of the research.