Understanding of Cooperative Learning Type Student Teams
results showed an increase in each learning activity indicators from the first cycle to the second cycle. Reading the subject matter increased from
77.78 into 94.44, a discussion with members of the group in solving a given problem increased from 61.11 into 94.44, ask the teacher or
friends increased from 77.78 into 94.44, or respond to the opinion expressed increased from 72.22 into 88.89, helping fellow members of
the group in understanding the subject matter increased from 77.78 into 88.89, recorded or summarizes the subject matter increased from 77.78
into 88.89, working on cases or tasks assigned to work together increase from 77.78 into 94.44. The similarities the research above with the
research ers’ study lies in the learning model and the type of research, and
the difference is going on the term of time, research setting, and subject of the research.
3. Research conducted by Juwita Giri Mukti 2014, entitled “The
Implementation of Cooperative Learning Type Student Teams Achievement Division STAD Using Snakes and Ladders Games to
Improve Students ’ Learning Motivation and Activities of grade X AK 2 at
SMKN 1 Bantul Academic Year of 2013 2014”. The result showed an
increase of motivation and learning activities. T he score of students’
learning motivation improved from 76,14 on the cycle 1 into 90,48 on the cycle 2 or improved by 14,34. From questionnaire result, the score of
students’ learning motivation improved from 74,80 on cycle 1 into 83,06 on cycle
2 or improved by 8,26. Individually, students’ learning
motivation score obtained from observation sheet is 65,62 on the cycle 1 into 93,75 on the cycle 2 or improved by 28,13. Meanwhile, based on
questionnaire is 65,62 on the cycle 1 into 90,62 on the cycle 2 or improved by 25. And
the score of students’ learning activities improved from 76,13 on the cycle 1 into 89,84 on the cycle 2 or improved by
13,71. From questionnaire result, the score of students’ learning activities improved from 75,78 on cycle 1 into 82,03 on cycle 2 or
improved by 6,25. Individually, students’ learning activities score obtained from observation sheet is 68,75 on the cycle 1 into 90,62 on
cycle 2 or improved by 21,87. Meanwhile, based on questionnaire sheet is 71,87 on the cycle 1 into 93,75 on the cycle 2 or improved by
21,88. The similarities the research above with the research ers’ study
lies in the learning model and the type of research, and the difference is going on the term of time, research setting, and subject of the research.