D. Data Gathering Technique
The methods used to collect the data are by filling the questionnaire for the students of Hotel Accommodation Department of SMK N I Kalasan and
interviewing the English teachers of SMK N I Kalasan and some English lecturers in English Education Program of Sanata Dharma University to get the meaningful
feedback on the material design. There were two types of data gathering in this study. The first was gathering
data for needs survey. The writer collected the data interview from two English teachers of Hotel Accommodation Department of SMK N I Kalasan. The
interview was held in September 2008 in the Hotel Accommodation Department office. The writer distributed the questionnaire to the eleventh grade students of
Hotel Accommodation Department of SMK N I Kalasan. The second type was data gathering for conducting revision and improvement of the designed set
materials.
The writer distributed the questionnaire to two English lecturers in English Language Education Study Program and two English teachers in SMK N I Kalasan. The
post-design survey questionnaires were distributed in order to obtain the opinions, comments, and suggestions on the designed materials. The feedback from the English
lecturers and teachers is gained to revise the designed materials. The type of questionnaire is the combination of both open- and closed- form.
E. Data Analysis
After the questionnaires were collected, the data was recorded in table as raw data. The writer analyzed the data from the needs survey and then presented
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
them in the form of table. The results of the survey functioned as one of the considerations in designing the materials.
The data collected in the pre-design survey questionnaire would be calculated using percentage as follows.
100 ×
∑
n N
Note: N
= the total number of students who choose certain topic
∑
n = the total number of students In order to compute the data
from the materials evaluation questionnaire, three indexes were used as proposed by Ary, Jacob, and Razavieh 1976: 103.
They were “mean, median, and mode”. Since the data have been arranged into a frequency distribution, the sum of the scores can be computed by multiplying each
score by its frequency and summing these products, which simplifies the computation of the mean. The assessment of the participants’ opinion was based
on five points of agreement: 5 = strongly agree with the statement
4 = agree with the statement 3 = doubt with the statement
2 = disagree with the statement 1 = strongly disagree with the statement
The data was presented in the form of the table in which the respondents’ opinion and the mean included. The table of the descriptive statistics of the
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
respondents’ opinion on the designed set of English materials is like the following one:
Table 3.3. The Format of Descriptive Statistic of the Respondents’ Opinion Blank
No Respondents’ Opinions
Statements N Central
Tendency 1 2 3 4 5
Mn 1.
N = number of the participants Mn = mean
F. Research Procedure
Kategori