The discussion on the description of the respondents and the data presentation are as follows:
a. The Description of the Evaluation of the Material Design Respondents
The description
of
the respondents of the preliminary field testing is presented in Table 4.5.
Table 4.5. The Description of the Respondents of the Preliminary Field Testing
Group of Participants
Sex Educational Background
Teaching Experiences in years
M F D3 S1 S2 S3 5 5-10 10 English
Teacher 1
1 - 1 1 - 1 - 1 English
Lecturer 1
1 - - 2 - - 2
b. The Data Presentation
In order to obtain evaluation, comments, suggestions, and feedback on the designed materials, the writer distributed the questionnaire. The evaluation,
comments, suggestions, and feedback were used to revise and improve the designed materials. There are two parts that will be discussed in this subsection,
namely the Descriptive Statistics of Respondents’ Opinions on the Designed Materials and the Respondents Comments and Suggestions on the Designed
Materials.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
1 The Descriptive Statistics of Respondents’ Opinions on the Designed
Materials
This part presents the respondents’ opinion on the designed materials by stating their agreement, disagreement, and doubt. The questionnaire is intended to
obtain feedback of the appropriateness of the integrated English materials for eleventh grade students of Hotel Accommodation Department of SMK N I
Kalasan. In the questionnaire, the participants gave the evaluation by choosing the
representative number ranging 1 to 5 as the measurements points. The measurements points are:
5 = strongly agree with the statement 4 = agree with the statement
3 = doubt with the statement 2 = disagree with the statement
1 = strongly disagree with the statement The descriptive statistics presented the results of the writer’s calculation
on the data from the evaluation questionnaire using central tendency. The results were used to revise the designed materials. In the questionnaire, the respondents’
opinions were expressed in numbers which showed their degree of agreement as shown in Table 4.6. The following is the table of Descriptive Statistics of
respondents’ opinion.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
Table 4.6. The Results of the Preliminary Field Testing Questionnaire No Respondents’
Opinions N Central
Tendency Mean
1 The contents are suitable and appropriate for the Hotel
Accommodation students of SMK N I Kalasan. 4 4.8
2 The topics are well arranged.
4 4.3 3
The instructions are clear.
4 4.5 4
The exercises are variously given and interesting. 4 4.5
5 The activities are able to support the attainment of the
indicators. 4 4.0
6 The materials are closely related with the hotel
accommodation. 4 5.0
7 The number of activities in each unit has been sufficient
for the time given. 4 3.8
8 The method communicative language teaching is
appropriate in teaching and learning English for the Hotel Accommodation students of SMK N I Kalasan.
4 4.3 9
The designed materials are varied. 4 4.8
10 The designed materials are able to help the Hotel
Accommodation students of SMK N I Kalasan to develop their English.
4 4.3 11
The layouts of the designed materials are interesting. 4 4.8
Based on the results of the questionnaire, the designed materials were good and acceptable. The total mean of the designed materials was 4.5 on the
scale of 5.00. This meant that the designed materials were well designed and acceptable for the eleventh grade students of SMK N I Kalasan. However, the
designed materials still needed revisions based on the respondents’ evaluation, comments, suggestions, and feedback
.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
2 The Respondents Comments and Suggestions on the Designed Materials
This part elaborated the second section of the questionnaire in the form of open response items. The respondents were asked to write their suggestions and
opinions on the designed materials. The respondents’ suggestions and feedback were as follows:
a. The Respondents’ opinion on the strength of designed materials.
