Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 4 - 6
ANNEX P-6 Executive Summary Report shows the complete details of the contract package. Package No. 7: Indrapura
Tapan
The contract package just recently commenced on December 10, 2016. During the period from the issuance of Notice To Proceed NTP until end of this month, Contractor
concentrated on the preparation for mobilization at site .
To date, there in still no physical progress on sight at the project site. Progress Schedule S-Curve still to be prepared for further review and approval.
Package No. 11 : Bantal - Mukomuko
The actual overall progress attained by the Contractor up to end of this period is 24.82 against 25.39 based on the revised schedule due to approval of the results of Field Engineering .
At the end of the 10th month of the contract period, Contractor s performance with respect to their work progress seem to be satisfactory as the negative slippage have been kept to a single digit.
For more details of the Contract Package, refer to ANNEX P-11 Executive Summary Report . Package No. 13 : Sp. Rukis
Tj. Kemuning
The current status of this contract package is being implemented in a right direction as up to end of this period, the actual progress is ahead of schedule by 4.10.
During the month, subtantial progress of 10.31 has been achieved. Barring any unforseen circumstances that will disrupt or interrupt the construction implementation, it is expected that the project can be
completed on-time or even ahead of the schedule.
Details of the work progress are shown in ANNEX P-13 Executive Summary Reports. Package No. 15: Sibolga Bts. Tapsel
The contract package just recently commenced on November 20, 2015. During the period from the issuance of Notice To Proceed NTP until end of this month, Contractor
concentrated on the preparation for mobilization at site .
To date, there in still no physical progress on sight at the project site. Progress Schedule S-Curve still to be prepared for further review and approval.
Package No. 17 : Sp. Gunung Kemal Pg. Tampak
The current status of the sub-project is fairly being implemented as evidenced by not incurrring any negative slippage since the Contractor commenced works way back in September 4, 2015.
Overall progress to date is 3.05 against 2.14 schedule, or the progress is slighty ahead of schedule. If Contractor can maintained the trend of their monthly progress, there is no reason that the works could
not be completed on or before the taget date of completion on August 23, 2017.
ANNEX P-17 Executive Summary Report shows the complete details and work progress of the project.
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 4 - 7
Package No. 19 : Lais Bintunan
To date, the cumulative work accomplished is 57.54, out of the 100 scheduled at month s end which is still based on the original schedule.
The problem that hampered the slow progress of the works is the unexpected disruption on the Contractor activities due to the unresolved compensation payments to PAP and review design for Field Engineering
is not finalized yet.
However, as the month ended, the issue regarding the results of the concluded Field Engineering has been resolved, thereby, an extension of contract period will be granted and the remaining 43 of the
works will be completed during the extended contract period.
Complete details of the contract package are shown in ANNEX P-19 Executive Summary Report
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 4 - 8
4.5 Quality Assurance
The DSC will be responsible for quality assurance of materials and workmanship, certifying whether or not contractors have achieved the required results, as well as documentation and reporting based on the
financial management plan. They will prepare a Quality Assurance system covering all subprojects, and continuously monitor the effectiveness of their supervision procedures.
Following are current problems which were the same problems during the preceeding month and issues relative to the execution of the works and quality assurance:
Package No.1 : Krui - Biha a Inadequate cash flow due to delayed preparation and submission by Contractor of the Monthly
Certificate of Payments. b Inadequate number of manpower.
c Inadequate number of Contractor s Laboratory personnel to perform daily test requirements and quality control activities.
Package No.2 : Padang Sawah Sp. Empat
a Late start of Air Gadang Bridge and unless Contractor will add additional manpower, completion of the bridge will be left behind.
b Separate design for side cut slope protection have to implemented as soon as possible. Package No.3 : Manggopoh Padang Sawah
a Separate design for side cut slope protection have to implemented as soon as possible. Package No.4 : Ipuh - Bantal
a Insufficient numbers of equipment. b Mismanagement between the joint operation partners.
c Insufficient manpower to execute the works on drainage structures. d Low output of rock crusher.
e Big percentage of works are still to be done during the remaining period until the end of the
extended completion time. Package No.5 : Sp. Rampa - Poriaha
a Field Engineering still to be finalized. b Contractor to prepare and implement catch-up schedule to reduce the huge progress negative
slippage. Package No.6 : Ps. Pedati - Kerkap
a Field Engineering shall be completed as soon as possible. Package No.7 : Indrapura - Tapan
a Contractor to submit Progress Schedule for approval. b Contractor have to start Field Engineering surveys.
Package No.11 : Bantal - Mukomuko a Field Engineering has been done and approved by DGH on October 23, 2015.
Package No.13 : Sp. Rukis Tj. Kemuning
a Contractor have to submit Work Progress Schedule for review and approval. Package No.15 : Sibolga
Bts. Tapsel a Contractor to submit Progress Schedule for approval.
b Contractor have to start Field Engineering surveys. Package No.19 : Lais - Bintunan
a Field Engineering shall be completed as soon as possible.
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 4 - 9
4.6 Environmental and Social Considerations
4.6.1 Current Overall Situation
A project category is assigned to each package as either Category A, B or C depending on the likely degree of influence on environmental issues with a brief explanation as follows:
Category A project is one which will have a significant negative impact on the environment and may have an influence on areas outside the actual project area. A project classified as such requires an AMDAL
ANDAL, RKLRPL study.
Category B project is one which affects the people or the environment to some extent but with a smaller impact than a Category A. The required environmental analysis is a UKLUPL study only.
Category C project has minimal effect on the people or environment and an environmental analysis is not required. SPPL are used to handle any minor problem which may arise.
Details of packages that require environmental and social safeguard are given in Appendix E and the following Table 4.3 provides a summary of the work involved in the 21 WINRIP packages.
All the twenty one 21 packages require environmental impact investigations and studies which need the approval by Environmental Agency BLH.
Nine 9 of the twenty one 21 packages are categorized under Category A projects wherein AMDALEIA studies are required and have to be approved by World Bank. The nine 9 packages are covered only by
five 5 AMDALEIA studies as some single study covers a combination of two 2 or three 3 sub-projects as indicated in Table 4.3. While 21 social studies SLARAP and LARAP require the approval of the World Bank.
Up to 31 December 2015, all the 22 environmental studies for the twenty one 21 sub-projects including a separate study UKLUPL for Air Gadang Bridge on Package No.2 were approved by BLH with 5 of these
studies AMDALEIA were granted No Objection Letter NOL from the World Bank while all the 21 social studies LARAP were already issued No Objection Letter NOL from the World Bank.
Table 4.3
Works Program
No of Packages
No of Investigations Approval by
Remarks BLH
World Bank
AWP-1 4
9 1 - AMDAL
2 - UKLUPL 2 - SPPL
4 - Full LARAP 1 - AMDAL
2 - UKLUPL 2 - SPPL
1 - EIA No Need
No Need 4 - Full LARAP
Coverage of Single AMDALEIA study are
the following Packages : a Packages 1 and 17
b Package 7,12 and 14
c Package 11 and 16 d Package 8
e Package 10 AWP-2
9 18
5 - AMDAL 4 - UKLUPL
1 - Simple LARAP 8 - Full LARAP
5 - AMDAL 4 - UKLUPL
4 - EIA No Need
1 - SLARAP 8 - Full LARAP
AWP-3 8
16 3 - AMDAL
5 - UKLUPL 8 - Full LARAP
3 - AMDAL 5 - UKLUPL
1 - EIA No Need
8 - Full LARAP
Total 21
43 Env=22,Soc=21
22 Env= 5, Soc=21
Note: 1 UKL UPL do not need a NOL from WB, and SPPL not necessary to submit to the WB. 2 Packages 9 and 18 to be deleted.
3 Air Gadang Bridge have separate investigation, hence, total equals 22.
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 4 - 10
Appendix E shows the Progress of Environmental Safeguard Studies. 4.6.2
Environmental and Social Issues
This section outlines the activities of the Social Impact Specialist and the Environmental Specialist during December 2015.
4.6.2.1 Environmental Issues
The main environmental issues, specifically on the AWP-1 packages are the implementation of mitigating measures on pollution of spilled oil, grease and solid waste in the Contractors Base Camps. Air and dust
pollution along stretches of thickly populated areas are not properly addressed by the Contractors. Water spraying is not continuously implemented. Dump trucks transporting construction material are not fully
covered and traffic management plan is not fully implemented. In addition there exist negative impact on the quarrying operations as existing river banks are eroded causing water pollutions. Deep excavation at
the quarry sites were not restored to its original level.
Monitoring of Environmental Aspects During Construction
CTC provided revised monitoring forms to DSC and Contractor for use in monitoring of environmental and social impacts. These forms are to be used every month by the DSC Environmental Specialist.
CTC s environmental staffs actively advises DSC on environmental monitoring, DSC have directly carried out monitoring or to implement the Environmental and Social Analysis Management Plan for WINRIP.
CTC s Environment Specialist monitored the implementation of environmental mitigations during the month of December 2015 and the following were observed :
Package No.1 : Krui Biha
a Drainage system is not functioning to the desired capacity due to the presence of obstructions such as trees and utilities. The obstruction have to be removed andor relocated out of the drainage
lines, the electricity poles that are inside the drainage lines have to be taken out in the drainage system.
b Road signs and guardrails are not yet installed along the adjacent sides of the mosque which are too close to the road shoulders.
c Cross drains not yet built d The quarry not manage by the supplier as the deep excavation area were not yet restored to
original levels. Package No.2 : Pd. Sawah
Sp. Empat and Air Gadang Bridge a Construction of the Air Gadang Bridge have impact on the activities of the resident living nearby the
constructions site, such activities as laundry chores, fetching of water for daily use and other activities related to the use of the river.
Contractor shall apply for standard operating procedure for bridge management construction. b The monitoring report prepared by the DSC site supervision team lack some necessary informations
; photograph not provided, remarks not filled up. c Relationship and coordination by the contractor with the local residents shall be maintained in a
diplomatic approach to prevent complains and unrest.
