1. Home
  2. Lainnya

Penilaian Sikap Penilaian Pengetahuan

K. RUBRIK PENILAIAN

1. Penilaian Sikap

No Aspek Sub Aspek Skor Kriteria Penilaian 1 Ketekunan 3 Sungguh-sungguh dalam mengerjakan tugas. 2 Sungguh-sungguh mengerjakan tugas ketika diawas 1 Tidak sungguh-sungguh dalam mengerjakan tugas. 2 Keterlibatan dalam belajar Respon terhadap penjelasan guru 3 Aktif memperhatikan penjelasan guru 2 Kurang memperhatikan penjelasan guru 1 Tidak memperhatikan penjelasan guru Keterlibatan dalam kelompok 3 Terlibat aktif berdiskusi 2 Kurang terlibat dalam berdiskusi 1 Tidak terlibat aktif dalam berdiskusi. Interaksi dengan guru 3 Aktif bertanya pada guru 2 Sesekali bertanya pada guru 1 Tidak pernah bertanya pada guru 3 Kesiapan belajar 3 Membawa kerangka penulisan, dan sesuai kriteria yang ditentukan. 2 Membawa kerangka penulisan, tetap belum memenuhi kriteria. 1 Tidak membawa kerangka penulisan. No Aspek Sub Aspek Skor Kriteria Penilaian 4 Ketepatan waktu pengumpulan tugas 3 Tepat Waktu 2 Telat 1 hari 1 Telat 2 hari atau lebih

2. Penilaian Pengetahuan

Aspects Score Judgement Content 30 —27 knowledgeable, substantive 26 —22 some knowledge of subject, adequate range 21 —17 limited knowledge of subject, little substance 16 —13 does not show knowledge of subject, non-substantive Organization 20 —18 fluent expression, ideas clearly stated 17 —14 somewhat choppy, but main ideas stand out 13 —10 non-fluent, ideas confused or disconnected 9 —7 does not communicate, no organization Vocabulary 20 —18 sophisticated range, effective word choice and usage 17 —14 adequate range, occasional errors, but meaning not obscured 13 —10 limited range, frequent errors 9 —7 little knowledge of English vocabulary Language Use 25 —22 effective complex construction 21 —19 effective but simple construction 17 —11 major problems in simplecomplex construction 10 —5 virtually no mastery of sentence construction rules Mechanics 5 demonstrates mastery of conventions 4 occasional errors of spelling, punctuation 3 frequent errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization 2 dominated by errors of spelling, punctuation, etc.

L. PENGHITUNGAN SKOR DAN PERSENTASE

Dokumen yang terkait

Improving students' writing ability through clustering technique (A classroom action research in the second year of SMP al-hasra Bojongsari- Depok)

4 11 109

Improving Students' Reading Comprehension of Report Text through SQ3R Technique (A Classroom Action Research at the Eleventh Grade Students of SMAN 1 Parung))

0 7 145

Teacher indirect feedback on students’discussion text writing

0 4 37

Improving Students’ English Vocabulary Through Cluster Technique ( A Classroom Action Research At The Second Grade Of Smp Al-Kautsar Bkui Jakarta)

2 9 62

Improving students’ skill in writing procedure text through picture sequences: a classroom action research at the ninth grade of MTs Negeri Tangerang 2 Pamulang

0 3 118

Improving the students’ Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text through Story Mapping

3 28 105

Improving students’ writing skill in narrative text through movies : a classroom action research in the eighth grade students of MTS NEGERI 3 Jakarta

0 5 127

the effectiveness of using indirect feedback on students' writing of procedure text (a quasi-experimetal study at the second grade of smp ibadurrahman cipondoh, tangerang)

0 8 98

Improving Students' Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text through Group Work Technique (A Classroom Action Research at the Eight Grade of SMPN 13 Tangerang Selatan)

0 3 98

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT THROUGH GROUP WORK AT THE FIRST YEAR OF SMA N 8 SURAKARTA (CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH).

0 0 6