Planning Phase Acting Phase Observing Phase

Figure 3.1 A Modified Kurt Lewin’s Classroom Action Research Design 1 To make them clear about what happens in each phase, below is the explanation about each phase:

1. Planning Phase

In the beginning, after identifying and diagnosing students’ writing problems occurred in the class proven by interviewing the teacher, observing the class, and conducting the test, some plans related to how to solve the problems in the classroom were made. The plans in this planning phase included designing lesson plan, determining technique, preparing materials and media, and determining criteria of success. The organized planning was formed into lesson plan which was, then, implemented to the students. Post-action tests were also prepared in order to know whether there were some improvements on the students’ score achievement from each test.

2. Acting Phase

This phase was the implementation of planning phase contents. In this phase, the lesson plan made was implemented. In the first meeting, pre-action test was conducted to know students’ writing skills before teacher indirect feedback was implemented. Besides of that, it was also used to analyse the average number of 1 M. Djunaidi Ghony, Penelitian Tindakan Kelas, Malang: UIN-Malang Press, 2008, p. 64. Observing Planning Reflecting Cycle Acting words students could produce. Moreover, after the average number of words had been counted, then the range number of words students should be produced in the next tests were standardised. In each cycle, three meetings were needed. The first cycle was conducted to deliver some materials needing achieving. Then, the second meeting was used to conduct the tests. After the data had been collected, then feedback was given on students’ paper. Lastly, the third meeting was used to revise their writing that teacher had put feedback on.

3. Observing Phase

In this phase, observation toward implementation of the action was carried out by using observation sheets and observation journals. In this phase, the data derived from evaluation or post-action tests were also collected in order to know the changes made by the implementation of the action toward the subject of the research.

4. Reflecting Phase

Dokumen yang terkait

Improving students' writing ability through clustering technique (A classroom action research in the second year of SMP al-hasra Bojongsari- Depok)

4 11 109

Improving Students' Reading Comprehension of Report Text through SQ3R Technique (A Classroom Action Research at the Eleventh Grade Students of SMAN 1 Parung))

0 7 145

Teacher indirect feedback on students’discussion text writing

0 4 37

Improving Students’ English Vocabulary Through Cluster Technique ( A Classroom Action Research At The Second Grade Of Smp Al-Kautsar Bkui Jakarta)

2 9 62

Improving students’ skill in writing procedure text through picture sequences: a classroom action research at the ninth grade of MTs Negeri Tangerang 2 Pamulang

0 3 118

Improving the students’ Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text through Story Mapping

3 28 105

Improving students’ writing skill in narrative text through movies : a classroom action research in the eighth grade students of MTS NEGERI 3 Jakarta

0 5 127

the effectiveness of using indirect feedback on students' writing of procedure text (a quasi-experimetal study at the second grade of smp ibadurrahman cipondoh, tangerang)

0 8 98

Improving Students' Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text through Group Work Technique (A Classroom Action Research at the Eight Grade of SMPN 13 Tangerang Selatan)

0 3 98

IMPROVING STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXT THROUGH GROUP WORK AT THE FIRST YEAR OF SMA N 8 SURAKARTA (CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH).

0 0 6