235
is to make the market feel comfortable again and the fluency of trading activity. They have a reason that old buildings is still proper to use. Their reason is strong trough a letter from Gapeksindo
Peduli Sumbar No. 55Gapeksindo2009 dated 2009, November 2 declare that the buildings in Inpres II, III, and IV are still proper to use.
Considering the dismantle and rebuild planning for Inpres, II, III dan IV, that is one of rehabilitation and reconstruction activity after earthquake September 30, 2009 ago, so that activity
should have based on the valid laws in disaster reduction No. 21 year 2008 about the implementation of disaster reduction and the regulation of the leader of BNPB the disaster
reduction national corporation No. 11 year 2008 about the instruction of disaster reduction implementation after disaster. But, the government is still ignore the valid laws in disaster reduction
law to implementation the rehabilitation and reconstruction and threat the rights of traders in Inpres II, III and IV. In this case, the traders felt strongest to against the government policy because
government is not comply with the disaster law. The government effort to discharge and rebuild of Inpres II, III and IV that occurred by
government of Padang with relocate the traders of Inpres II, III and IV to occupy the kiosk, but the traders denied that kiosk because they’re think the building of kiosks is not match with they’re
amount. According to the traders, there is a significant differentiation between the amount of emergency
kiosks and from the amount of traders of Inpres II, III dan IV, whereas the emergency kiosks as many as 624 units, and the amount of traders for entire in Inpres II, III dan IV about 907 traders;
379 traders in Inpres II floor 1, 60 traders in front of Begonjong market, 249 traders in Inpres III floor 1 and 219 traders in Inpres II floor 2.
This situation makes the activity in Pasar Raya Padang become increasingly than before, whereas in Pasar Raya Padang before that conflict has occurred only for economy activity and for
right now, since that conflict has appear there is more activity that are, the social politic fire of Padang society especially for Pasar Raya Padang society. And that is starting since the government
produce the policy about the rehabilitation and reconstruction has got a fighting from traders of Pasar Raya Padang. The fighting from traders is like demonstration. This is the new stage of their
conflict between the Government of Padang and the traders whereas it would be the resistance series between them that concern about rehabilitation and reconstruction in the building of Pasar
Raya Padang after earthquake on September 30, 2009 ago Fitriani : 47-48. Sometimes the conflict between them is not just demonstration, there is a physical conflict
between traders and security official. It has been counted two times the physical conflict about it and end up with arresting the leaders of traders. First, the conflict that occurred on February
10,2010in front of mayor house service with end up throwing stone and the defacement in mayor house service. Second, the conflict that occurred on August 31, 2011 that related about the process
of fence implementation in Pasar Raya Padang area that would be reconstruction.
V. SOURCE OF
THE PROBLEM
Talk about conflict, it cannot separate from society because conflict is created when somebody or group disagree with something. Usually, conflict would happen because there is something not
analogously. The conflict that occurred in society is not only for micro level, but it also happen in macro level that is to the group level organization, society even country. One of that sample conflict
that explained above between the government of Padang and traders of Pasar Raya Padang, it happened since 2009 after the earthquake was going on in Padang with power 7.9 SR.
That condition makes Padang city is like ghost city, no electricity, no communication network for days. Especially in Pasar Raya Padang, that is one of serious area who’s getting earthquake
effect. Pasar Raya is the biggest market in Padang, fully equipment needed. The broken of Pasar
236
Raya Padang makes the economy activity is weak because there is no money rotation. The conflict that occurred since the earthquake 2009, that is because the policy from government of Padang
about rehabilitation and reconstruction for the traders in Pasar Raya Padang. Even the conflict is still going on until now though the earthquake happened 6 years ago, basically, it because there are
no agreement yet between government and traders. The government still want to build the Inpres buildings in Pasar Raya Padang for entire is like investment mechanism, but the traders wants to
build the Inpres buildings in Pasar Raya Padang accordance to valid laws. There are some reasons of the different opinion that causing the conflict is still going on until now, they are:
1. Price of the Kiosk
Inpres Market traditional market is renamed into Blok 1 with different building from its previous structure. This is done due to its construction is meant not only for modern market but
also for shelter for people in case someday 9SR Earthquake and Tsunami attacks Padang in the next coming years. As modern market, market Blok 1 is equipped with various facilities such as
escalator, mosque, and toilet, shelter light and so on. So that it is expected that the traders and also visitor will feel safety and comfort while doing their trading activity in the market.
With the various facilities, local government is forced to raise the price for the kiosks in market Blok 1. Speaking of it, the price is offered variously starting from IDR 61.167.600, - to IDR
102.618.000, - with 10 of down-payment. Though the price is expensive, the Government also bridges the traders with Bank BPD in order to get loan from it. In the other hand, according to
the traders the price for kiosks in Pasar Blok 1 is way too expensive and burdens them. Traders from the old market Inpres 1 are mostly small-scale trader, regarding their trading goods.
According to lawyer of PBHI, the kiosks in the Blok 1 market are supposed to be free of charge. This is based on act chapter 60, line 1 UU No. 24 tahun 2007 about the overcoming of
disaster which states that the overcoming of disaster becomes mutual responsibility between central government and local government. It states that peraturan pemerintah Republik Indonesia
government’s rules No 22 tahun 2008 about funding and managing fund aid that 1 Funding for overcoming after-disaster problem should become mutual responsible of Central and Local
Government, 2 the overcoming disaster fund as stated in previous line 1 should be taken from APBN, APBD andor people. In chapter 20 of act is said that the fund should be use for
rehabilitation and construction after the disaster falls. However, according to Unit of the department of market service, the current newly build kiosks
cannot be free of charge because the buildings are completely new and equipped with various facilities. According to the unit, the traders as the yellow card trader identity card holder are
actually only given rights for using and managing the kiosks. Trader’s different perspective from Government is also believed to be the trigger of the conflicts.
2. Layout of Market Blok 1’s Structure
Aside from none of socialization from government, the layout of the market also becomes the trigger of the conflict. The design which is released by local government is apparently argued by
the traders. According to them, the design which is constructed by PT Fais Jaya cannot accommodate the traders’ need because the kiosks in it are very small and narrow for them.
