Keep Overtime Program INTRODUCTION

192

III. METHODOLOGY

The approach in these study used qualitative method with descriptive analysis. One of Bandung Juaras programme is Bandung city park revitalization. Green open spaces have sprung up access the fertile growing this city to expand the lungs of the city that is comfortable for Wargi Bandung. The more city parks obviously will increasingly enhance the happiness index of population in those city. Bandung City government did not hesitate to spend 12 billion rupiahs from APBDs budget not only to be used for renovation of existing parks, but also for the establishment of new parks. Bandung has 400 parks that 40 of them are designed as theme parks. Parks in the city of Bandung was also not spared from such facilities Free WI-Fi is increasingly supporting social activities. Therefore, this study used a qualitative approach. Cresswell 1998: 15 defines qualitative research as follows: Qualitative research is an inquiry process of understanding based on distinct methodological traditions of inquiry that explore a social or human problem. The researcher builds a complex, holistic picture, analysis of words, reports detailed views of informants, and conducts the study in a natural setting. Qualitative research is often also referred to as a method of ethnographic, phenomenological method, or a method of impressionistic Cresswell, 1998: 7; Sudjana and Ibrahim, 1989: 195. Because qualitative research methods are often used to generate theories based on data from the field grounded theory, then the resulting theory is called the generating theory. Therefore, the accuracy of interpretation relies heavily on analysis acumen, objectivity, systematic and systemic. The data to be obtained from the plan in the form of descriptive and analytical study of an event taken from the natural situation, the required accuracy in observing aspects studied. In this case the role of the researcher is crucial as a primary research tool key instrument. In line with the opinion Nasution 2003: 9 which explains that: Only human beings as instruments to understand the meaning of human interaction, face motion read, explore feelings and values contained in the words or deeds of respondents. Although used recording equipment or cameras researchers still play a major role as a research tool. Data Collection Techniques 1. Observation The term is derived observations and the Latin word meaning to see and attention. Which then accurately observe their activities, noting the phenomenon that appears, and consider the relationship between aspects of the phenomenon. In this study, the observation is done through observation aims to obtain data about a problem and examine the values adopted by the community, in order to obtain an understanding or as a means of re-checkingin or proof of information information obtained earlier. As usual scientific method of observation is defined as the observation and recording of the phenomena investigated systematically. In a broad sense observation is not only limited to the observations made, either directly or indirectly. Observation is also one of the techniques of data collection is very prevalent in qualitative research methods. Observation essentially an activity by using the senses, can sight, smell, hearing, to obtain the information necessary to answer the research problem. The results of observations in the form of activities, events, event, object, condition or a certain atmosphere, a persons emotions and feelings. Observations carried out to obtain a real picture of an event or events to answer the research questions

2. Focus Group Discussion FGD

Focus Group Discussion FGD a qualitative method. The aim is to obtain in-depth information on concepts, perceptions and ideas. This research method choose those which are supposed to represent and recognize the problem which is the subject of this research. In this case that would 193 be invited is the foodholic, humanists, sociologists and representatives from the television media crew. In these discussions the moderator explore opinions and views of respondents about their experiences in enjoying a culinary tour. Likewise, extracting information from bystanders culture spread in the community as well as observers of social changes taking place in society. From here then moderators have a key role to the success of the discussion. Researchers can act as a moderator or entrust to others. A moderator should have the ability in mastering interview techniques, to keep the flow of the discussion goes on, and able to act as a referee or even as a defense against what was considered good devils advocate. And then during the process of the discussion will be equipped with recording equipment, thus helping researchers in data analysis. Hariwijaya 2007: 72-73. FGD allows researchers to get complete data from informants that are usually used as the basis of a program pilot study. The implementation of FGD is also relatively fast, which is the longest time of recruitment of informants. FGD also allows researchers more flexibility in determining the design of the question, so free to ask informants in accordance with the purpose of research. However, the relative FGD requires considerable cost, in some cases, in addition consumption informants also got tired of money because it has been following the discussion. Broadly speaking Focus Group Discussion FGD, is wider than the interview. If the interview focused on the submission of questions to the informant or respondent, then the FGD, there is no questioning the specifics, but rather an effort to listen to information from various sources which is then formulated into a specific data. In this case the researchers are trying to collect data on a particular topic from many people who have information about these topics. Each side then express opinions, perceptions and thoughts of each of these topics in a discussion, in which researchers listeners duty to observe and facilitate the discussion. From the discussion, then produced a final opinion which represents the main idea of each party. Final opinion is then a last data collected by the researcher. Of course in the FGD, there is a certain level of perception and habit, according to the thinking of each part.

IV. STUDY OF

OBJECT New leadership always brings change and a new atmosphere. Likewise with mayor and vice mayor of Bandung Ridwan Kamil and Oded M Danial who bring new programs to realize the Bandung Juara, champion in all lines of life of its citizens. At the beginning of his leadership, the pair Ridwan Kamil and Oded M. Danial want to deal with the problems of this city through a crucial moment rapid reaction. Indeed, this stance is only to address the problem on a small scale in the hope not grow big. In order to implement the vision and mission of the Regions in accordance with Regulation no. 08 Years of Regional Long Term Development plan RPJPD years, Bandung municipal government prepare measures and strategic activities in a planned, integrated, coordinated and aligned with the potential social, cultural, economic, and local wisdom through efforts to create a climate of Bandung Champion, by making the program -Program: 1. The working group Congestion Bandung, 2. Working groups of street vendors, garbage 3. The working group Bandung, Bandung 4. The working group integrated, secure Bandung 5. Working groups social issues, 6. Working groups flood Bandung, 7. The working group creative city of Bandung, Bandung 8. The working group cultural city, 9. The working group Bnadung Smart city, Bandung 10. The working group collaboration, 11. Working groups hometown champion, 12. The working group revitalized Bandung, 13. The working group of reform education, 14. The working group pariwisaata Bandung, 15. The working group market reforms Bandung, 16. The working group thematic gardens, 17. The working group bandung city of music movies, 18. The working group design the city of Bandung, 19. The working group happiness index index of hapinnes Bandung, 20. The working group public relations Bandung, 21. The working group Dekranasda Bandung reform, reform 22. The working group of PKK Bandung, 23. The working group of health.