CONCLUSIONS Proc 2015 Commemorative Academic Conference

225 Global Market Advisors. 2015. Casino and the City: A White Paper on the History of Casino Development in Cities, Past and Current Trends, and Recommendations for Future Development. Available fromhttp:globalmarketadvisors.comwp-contentuploads201504Casinos-and-the-City-A-White-Paper-On-Urban- Casino-Development.pdf Gottdiener, M, C Collins, D Dicken. 1999. Las Vegas: The Social Production of an All-American City. Blackwell, Oxford. Gunn, GC. 1995. Macau, 1578-1999. An Economic and Political History. Historical Archives of Macao Books Catalogue Call number: LR.0721. Historical Archives of Macao, Macao. Hagedorn, J. 2007. Gangs in the Global City: Alternatives to Traditional Criminology. University of Illinois Press, Illinois. Hall, J, G. Ikenberry. 1989. The State. University of Minnesota Press, Minnesota. Kelly, A. 1988, February 4th. When the luck changed for Stanley Ho. The Age: 7. Lang, R, C Nicholas. 2011. The World City of Gaming. UNLV Gaming Research Review Journal 15 2: 3-4. Las Vegas Review-Journal.1999a, February 7th. Moe Dalitz. Available from http:www.reviewjournal.comnewsmoe-dalitz Leigh, I. 2011. Accountability and intelligence cooperation: framing the issue. In International Intelligence Cooperation and Accountability, ed. Born H, Leigh I, Wills A, 3-17. Routledge, New York. Lo, S. 2007. Casino politics, Organized crime and the Post-colonial state in Macau. Journal of Contemporary China 14 43: 207-224. Lo, T. 2010. Beyond Social Capital: Triad Organized Crime in Hong Kong and China. British Journal of Criminology 50 5: 851-872. Martino, F, A Spoto. 2006. Social Network Analysis: A brief theoretical review and further perspectives in the study of Information Technology. PsychNology Journal 41: 53-86. McGivering, J. 1999. Macao Remembers. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Milgram, A, J Lichtblau.2009, May 18th. Special report of the Division of Gaming Enforcement to the casino control commission on its investigation of MGM Mirage’s joint venture with Pansy Ho in Macau, Special Administrative Region, People’s Republic of China. Available from http:www.state.nj.uscasinoshomeinfodocsMGMdge_20report_redacted.pdf Miliband, R. 1969. The State in Capitalist Society.Basic Books, New York. Miliband, R. 1977. Marxism and Politics.Oxford University Press, Oxford. Mills, CW. 1956. The Power Elite.Oxford University Press, New York. Newton, M. 2009. Mr. Mob: The Life and Crimes of Moe Dalitz. McFarland Company, North Carolina. Orlando Sentinel. 1987, June 18th. Laxalt Denies Paper’s Story Linking Him with Mobster. Available from http:articles.orlandosentinel.com1987-06-18news0130440204_1_laxalt-organized-crime-dalitz Pablo, C., AFP.2000, February 5th. House Probe an Insult – Stanley Ho. The Daily Inquirer: 2. Patrucic, M. 2014. Montenegro: Prime Minister’s Family Bank Catered to Organized Crime. Available fromhttps:reportingproject.netunholy-alliancesprime-ministers-family-bank-catered-to-organized-crime.html Pessanha, L. 2012. Gaming Concessions in Macau. In Studies on Macau Gaming Law, ed. Mancuso S, 47-124. LexisNexis, China. Pina-Cabral, J. 2002. Between China and Europe: Person, Culture, and Emotion in Macao. Continuum, London. Pinho, A. 1987.Gambling in Macau. In Macau: City of Commerce and Culture, ed. Cremer RD, 7-21. Historical Archives of Macao Books Catalogue Call number: AH 10093. Historical Archives of Macao, Macao. Ragin, C,D Zaret. 1983. Theory and Method in Comparative Research: Two Strategies. Social Forces 61 3: 731- 751. Research Institute for European and American Studies. 2014. Ukraine’s Anti-Soviet Euro Revolution. Available fromhttp:www.taraskuzio.neteuromaidan_files8.pdf Risse, T. 2013. Governance without a state? Policies and Politics in areas of limited statehood. Columbia University Press, New York. Scott, J. 2013. Social Network Analysis 3rd Ed.. SAGE Publications Ltd, London. Shiraz, Z. 2013. Drugs and Dirty Wars: intelligence cooperation in the global South. Third World Quarterly 3410: 1749-1766. Simon, D. 2008. Elite Deviance 9th Ed.. Pearson Education, Inc., New York. Skocpol, T. 1979. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Skocpol, T. 1992. Protecting soldiers and mothers. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Sreedhar, A. 2013. My Days in the Underworld: Rise of the Bangalore Mafia. Westland Ltd, India. Sutherland, EH. 1940. White-collar criminality. American Sociological Review 5 1: 1-12. 226 U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation. 2001. Morris B. Dalitz. Progressive Management, New Jersey. Retrieved from database 20th Century FBI Files: Declassified Documents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation FBI. Mafia, Organized Crime, and Gangsters Volume 10, CD-ROM, 2001 release. ISBN: 1-931828-01-6. Van Duyne, P. 1993. Organized Crime and Business Crime-Enterprises in the Netherlands. Crime, Law, and Social Change 19 2:103-142. Varese, F. 2012. How Mafias take advantage of Globalization: The Russian Mafia in Italy. British Journal of Criminology52 2: 235-253. Vlcek, W. 2015.Taking other people’s money: development and the political economy of Asian casinos. The Pacific Review 283: 323-345. Wang, W, WR Eadington. 2008. The VIP-room contractual system and Macao’s traditional casino industry. China: An International Journal 6 2: 237-260. Welker, J. 2005. The New Macau. Historical Archives of Macao Books Catalogue Call number: AH 10663. Historical Archives of Macao, Macao. Wilensky, HL. 1967. Organizational Intelligence: Knowledge and Policy in Government and Industry. Basic Books, New York. Wong, PN. 2009. In Search of the State-in-Society: Reconceiving Philippine Political Development, 1946-2002. VDM Verlag Dr. Müller Aktiengesellschaft Co. KG, Saarbrücken, Germany. 227 Illustrations and figures Mr. Morris Dalitz Network The Ego-Network of Moe Dalitz with respect to the key groups Mr. Dalitz used to shape Las Vegas. Morris Bar ey Dalitz Cover- e Me ers of Orga ized Cri e States e Pu li Offi ials 228 Dr. Stanley Ho Network The Ego-Network of Dr. Stanley Ho with respect to the key groups Dr. Ho used to shape Macao. Dr. Sta ley Ho Hu g Su Orga ized-Cri e Affiliates Me ers of Orga ized Cri e Triad e ers Busi ess e States e Pu li Offi ials 229 Solidarity of the Traders in Pasar Raya Padang the Main of Padang Market after Earthquake that Concerning about Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Policy Rinel Fitlayeni, Elvawati, Marleni, Afrizal, and Indraddin Abstract The earthquake that was going in West Sumatera at September 30, 2009 ago, has affected the destruction, disadvantages and causing the economy activity is being low in Padang city. That situation need a policy that should have take attention by local government for rehabilitation and reconstruction form, whereas that form should not interfere the rights of traders as earthquake victims, by engage the traders itself to make a policy together with local government. The fact is, the discussion process that will be held by local government to fix this problem is break off by local government with using force fences in the market buildings, whereas it is coincide with 1 Syawal 1432 H Muslim calendar and build up the emergency kiosk that incompatible by traders, because that buildings makes their income is being low, desolate. That is make the traders to collect any supports from others to against the policy from local government that concerned about rehabilitation and reconstruction form by large demonstration from traders of Pasar Raya Padang to the representation of Padang council DPRD Kota Padang. Beside that, they are also invite some of organization that concerned about that and giving a lawyer to PBHI the association of Indonesian law assistance and human rights 230

I. INTRODUCTION

Market is important for economy foundation. Beside that, market is also like a container for economy social activity, the function of market itself to unite or collect the economy agents. Market also have a function like an economy tools for the measure in increasing the income of one region. The activity in Pasar Raya Padang has broken since the earthquake at September 30, 2009 ago which affected the damage of Inpres buildings in Pasar Raya Padang, especially for Inpres I building. As a consequence, it need quickly handling by government to revitalizee by building the emergency kiosk like small building in entire of the road in Pasar Raya Padang. And half of traders disagreed about that. They are demand to local government to dismantle kiosk with the reason their income is being low, desolate. The local government has closing Angkot mini bus track, whereas this area often using for buyers many long times ago. But, government still defends the emergency kiosk because it has spent out the billion Rupiah. This situation has changed to long conflict between traders of Pasar Raya Padang and local government of Padang along five years 2009 – 2014, but there is no agreement yet so far about it for both of side. Technically, the process of handling disaster in reconstruction and rehabilitation, should follow the valid laws No. 24 year 2007 about disaster reduction. The rehabilitation and reconstruction in Inpres market buildings of Pasar Raya Padang cannot separate from the civil rights of traders itself, accordance to the agreements between local government and traders. Processing of rehabilitation and reconstruction cannot abolish from the civil rights of traders as earthquake victims. Therefore, for the process of rehabilitation and reconstruction, government have to engage the traders as earthquake victim to make decision together. The policy of local government to build force fences in Inpres II, III and IV buildings in Pasar Raya Padang by invoked the Army, Police and Satpol PP guards of local government which has end up create a victims in traders side, that is wrong step from local government. That step is one of the violation of the human rights. Beside that, that fence has building on August 31,2011 and it is coincide with 1 Syawal 1432 H Muslim calendar, whereas on that date is a holy day for Muslim Idul Fitri and it is hurts for Muslim peoples. Local government have a commitment to solve the problem about rehabilitation and reconstruction in the beginning of the August 2011 by organize a meeting with traders of Pasar Raya Padang which is they are getting earthquake victim, but government is not consistent with what they already decided, it is delayed until August 31, 2011. The destruction of buildings in Pasar Raya Padang, make the local government to looking for a place “relocation” for traders. They are building emergency kiosk in entire of the Pasar Raya Padang road; Sandang Pangan and Pasar Baru street. But, there is a traders is not agreed about that. They are which is not getting the earthquake effect for seriously, and because of that their shop is closing because processing of relocation in Inpres I, II, III and IV and they are cannot accept that policy just like thatwww.padangnews. When the policy of local government to build the emergency kiosk hasgetting a fights by half of traders. They are demand to dismantle that buildings with reason economy is being low and desolate. Lots of large demonstration has organize by traders of Pasar Raya Padang which is join with Padang citizen forum FWK to the representation of Padang council, ask them to accept their aspiration; local government should have dismantle the emergency kiosk. But, the government still defending that building with reason, it has spent out billion Rupiah. It is been five years the conflict between local government and traders in Pasar Raya Padang 2009 – 2014, but there is no agreement yet for both of side so far. The conflicts between them are open conflict, the effective way to solve this problem is outside of judicature. So, the background of this writings to review or analyzing the traders strategy to collect any supporting against the government policy, because there is no agreement yet so far. 231 According to Damsar in his book, Economy Sociology 2011, market is divided into 2 types, they are market as place and just market. Market as place is a physical form which is the commodities and services has been brought up to the market and sell it Damsar 2011.Meanwhile, the definition of market by sociology as a social institution, it means a social structure whose prepared some of goods or service as solves the problem of the requirements in economy basic within goods and service distribution. It is seems like a social relationship series which is structured in sale something valuable. Whereas, Belshaw 1981 more complex to define the market is the place that having social elements, economics, cultures, politics and others, a place for buyers and sellers met each to organize transaction or barter. To know about the social solidarity form that happened between traders of Pasar Raya Padang is using the solidarity concept that has founding by Emile Durkheim. The appoint of solidarity is on the situation of individual or group relationship which has based on moral feeling and the belief which is believe together which is powerfully by emotional together Jhonson, 1994, 181. Durkheim has divided the social solidarity into two types to analyze, society or groups. First, mechanic solidarity is depend on the individuals that having same characteristics and believe the same belief and having the same normative pattern also. The special characteristics that solidarity based on the high homogeneities level in belief, sentiment, and others. Second, organic solidarity is a solidarity based on the high dependence as result and specialization additional in job division, which is possible increasing the differentiation also in individuals Jhonson, 1994, 183- 184. II. RESEARCH METHODS This article is a report from the research that funding by Dipa Dikti trough Pekerti the collaboration all of university researchers at 2015. The research has conducted by qualitative approach with descriptive research. The research hasbeen taken in Pasar Raya Padang, West Sumatera. Pasar Raya Padang has been chosen because this market getting the serious effected from earthquake at 2009 ago, and the rehabilitation and reconstruction of Pasar Raya Padang after earthquake, that is causing the conflict between local government and traders. There are also other informants whose engage in this conflict, they are the traders of Inpres I, II, III, IV, VII phase and Batu Bagonjong, local government government of Padang city, IKAPI the coalescence of Indonesian traders and PBHI the association of Indonesian law assistance and human rights.The processing of collecting the data is collect the document of conflict that happened during 6 years, from media, notes of a meeting, reports and journal. Beside that, it also collected data by using observation on the situation in Pasar Raya Padang after rehabilitation and reconstruction that caused by earthquake. To get powerful and valid data, it also used an interview among them.

III. PASAR

RAYA PADANG AFTER THE EARTHQUAKE The shake of earthquake with power 7.9 SK, and suddenly break out all of activity Singgalang, 2009 October 30. Peoples getting panicked and running away from the buildings when all of this happens. They are afraid of falling down the buildings, it is become everyone get panicked, after the earthquake has stopping, peoples still panicked. The mainly reason they are panicked is there are Tsunami issue. In their knowledge, West Sumatera is Tsunami territory because Sumatera island has locateon the broken fragments of the ring of earthquake. That fear makes a thousands of Padang society evacuate to the east when the earthquake has stopping, because east area of Padang is the highest place as Tsunami evacuation. After the earthquake, Padang city is like a ghost city, desolate, without light, without water and without communication network. The tectonic earthquake with power 7.9 SR which was going