Civil Works Progress Quality Assurance
Monthly Progress Report August 2013
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 15
documentation and reporting based on the financial management plan. They will prepare a Quality Assurance system covering all subprojects, and continuously monitor the
effectiveness of their supervision procedures.
On July 01, 2013 Quality Assurance Engineer of the CTC already in mobilization. In according with activity of Quality Assurance Engineer in August 2013, there are some
comment for Quality Assurance Engineer, during site visit to Padang, West Sumatera, about as:
Explain the Quality Assurance Report who responsibility to made, preparing, checking and approval.
CTC visit to BBPJN II Office Padang and meet “ Kasie Perencanaan Teknis dan Lingkungan”, he explains the mean and purpose of visit.
Comment after site visit package Bts. Kota Pariaman – Manggopoh, existing condition:
o
From Sta. 0+00 – Sta. 3+200 existing pavement is not so bad, and width 7.00 m design 2.00+7.00+2.00
o
Next from Sta. 3+200 the pavement width 5.00 only and not completed with drainage and there are should be study Social Safeguard LARAP first.
4.6 Environmental and Social Considerations 4.6.1 Current Overall Situation
A project category is assigned to each package as either Category A, B or C depending on the likely degree of influence on environmental issues with a
brief explanation as follows Appendix E.
Category A project is one which will have a significant negative impact on the environment and may have an influence on areas outside the actual project area.
A project classified as such requires an AMDAL ANDAL, RKLRPL study.
Category B project is one which affects the people or the environment to some extent but with a smaller impact than a Category A. The required environmental
analysis is a UKLUPL study only.
Category C project has minimal effect on the people or environment and an environmental analysis is not required. Standard operational procedures SOP or
SKPPL are used to handle any minor problem which may arise.
Details of packages that require environmental safeguards are given in Appendix E.
The following table provides a summary of the work involved are 21 packages.
Works Programme
No of Packages
No of Investigations Approval by
Remarks BLH
World Bank
AWP-1 4
8 SPPL x 4
Full LARAP x 4 4
SPPL 4
Full LARAP Approved – NOL issued
by WB, except for SPPL
AWP-2 8
17 4 UKLUPL
2 All of LARAP
Not yet 1 one Study AMDAL for
threes packages, are
Monthly Progress Report August 2013
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 16
Simple LARAP x 1 Full LARAP x 8
AMDAL Study x 4 UKLUPL x 4
AMDAL Approval
Packages No.7, 12 and 14 packages on AWP2
AWP3.
1 one Study AMDAL for two packages, are
Packages No.11 16. packages on AWP2
AWP3.
AWP-3 9
14 Full LARAP x 8
AMDAL Study x 1 UKLUPL x 5
5 UKLUPL All of LARAP
Not yet Approval
Approved – NOL issued by WB, except for AMDAL
and UKLUPL
Total 21
39 15
4
Out of 21 packages, have required environmental impact investigation. All 39 studies 18 environmental studies are requiring approval of the Environmental Agency BLH and 21
social studies LARAP requiring approval of the World Bank. Now there are 15 packages 83 has received BLH approval then 19 of social studies LARAP has received
approval from World Bank.
Those packages that require action at present with respect to environmental or social considerations are:
• Environmental studies for packages No.1,2 and 3 was issued approval by BLH on 2010,
packages No.4.5,8,9,10, 13.18,19,20 and 21 was approved on 2011 and BLH approved on 2012 for package No.7.
• Social studies LARAP and Monitoring was issued NOL WB for packages No.1.2 and 3,
those sub projects can started for civil work, except 1 one package in AWP1 is package No.4 ; Ipuh-Bantal, the project not yet paid the lands asset of PAPs.