Procurements WINRIP DOC MPR CTC MPR No.8 2013 08 2013 08 09 00225.

Monthly Progress Report August 2013 Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 14 All subprojects for WP-1 have been started with prequalification since 30 December 2011 for ICB multiple contract. This was an advanced procurement action agreed by both DGH and the World Bank prior to the CTC establishment. The Bank approved the AERs with issuance letter Ref. No. WINRIP122 dated May 1 st , 2013. Notification of Pre-Qualification Results had been announced to all PQ participants on Mei 17, 2013 and then invitation to bid was sent to to pre-qualified Bidder and issued of the bidding document on May 27, 2013. Pokja had conducted the Pre-Bid Meeting and Site Visit on June 2013. The last date for submission the bids and the bids opening was on July 18, 2013. All of the Procurement Committees had finished their Bidding Evaluation Report BER for each package and sent to PMU for review. CTC based on BERs received from PMU had evaluated all of BERs and made Consolidated Bid Evaluation Report Consolidated BERs and no option for proposed award of the contracts other than recommended by the committees. DGH has also completed the draft of consolidated multiple contract ICB Standard Bidding Document for four 4 packages under AWP-1. The draft had been submitted to the Bank on 8 March 2012. The Bank’s comments had been issued on 12 March 2012. The draft of consolidated SBD was revised by DGH accommodating the Bank’s comments and submitted to the Banks on 27 June 2012. Second revision of the draft consolidated SBD, as requested by the Bank regarding synchronization between drawings and Bill of Quantities by letter dated 1 August 2012, was then concurred by the Bank on 31 October 2012. CTC had also involved in Selection of DSC WINRIP since March 2013, started by attend the opening of Financial Proposal on March 5, 2013. Procurement committee for Selection of DSC had sent Technical Evaluation Report TER to the Bank on December 20, 2013 and had received the approval from the Bank on February 21, 2013. The Final Evaluation Report including Technical and Financial Evaluation and completed with Notice of Negotiation and Draft Contract then was sent to Bank by the committee on April 3 rd , 2013. NOL from the Bank was received on April 19, 2013 to Renardet, SA Switzerland cs as the first rank of technical and financial evaluation result. Finally the contract for this assignment was sign on June 11, 2013. The WINRIP Procurement Plan is shown in Appendix F.

4.3 Civil Works Implementation

Until the end of August 2013, there was no subproject contracted.

4.4 Civil Works Progress

No civil works progress can be reported since there was no subproject contracted until the end of August 2013.

4.5 Quality Assurance

The DSC will be responsible for quality assurance of materials and workmanship, certifying whether or not contractors have achieved the required results, as well as Monthly Progress Report August 2013 Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 15 documentation and reporting based on the financial management plan. They will prepare a Quality Assurance system covering all subprojects, and continuously monitor the effectiveness of their supervision procedures. On July 01, 2013 Quality Assurance Engineer of the CTC already in mobilization. In according with activity of Quality Assurance Engineer in August 2013, there are some comment for Quality Assurance Engineer, during site visit to Padang, West Sumatera, about as:  Explain the Quality Assurance Report who responsibility to made, preparing, checking and approval.  CTC visit to BBPJN II Office Padang and meet “ Kasie Perencanaan Teknis dan Lingkungan”, he explains the mean and purpose of visit.  Comment after site visit package Bts. Kota Pariaman – Manggopoh, existing condition: o From Sta. 0+00 – Sta. 3+200 existing pavement is not so bad, and width 7.00 m design 2.00+7.00+2.00 o Next from Sta. 3+200 the pavement width 5.00 only and not completed with drainage and there are should be study Social Safeguard LARAP first. 4.6 Environmental and Social Considerations 4.6.1 Current Overall Situation A project category is assigned to each package as either Category A, B or C depending on the likely degree of influence on environmental issues with a brief explanation as follows Appendix E. Category A project is one which will have a significant negative impact on the environment and may have an influence on areas outside the actual project area. A project classified as such requires an AMDAL ANDAL, RKLRPL study. Category B project is one which affects the people or the environment to some extent but with a smaller impact than a Category A. The required environmental analysis is a UKLUPL study only. Category C project has minimal effect on the people or environment and an environmental analysis is not required. Standard operational procedures SOP or SKPPL are used to handle any minor problem which may arise. Details of packages that require environmental safeguards are given in Appendix E. The following table provides a summary of the work involved are 21 packages. Works Programme No of Packages No of Investigations Approval by Remarks BLH World Bank AWP-1 4 8 SPPL x 4 Full LARAP x 4 4 SPPL 4 Full LARAP Approved – NOL issued by WB, except for SPPL AWP-2 8 17 4 UKLUPL 2 All of LARAP Not yet 1 one Study AMDAL for threes packages, are