Monthly Progress Report August 2013
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 23
Complex complaints are followed by a thorough investigation.
•
Field Investigation and Analysis. In the case of an investigation being required, the CHS team will make field
visits and take necessary action such as discussion with related institutions Satker, Dinas, Supervision Consultant, etc; invite the complainer; interview
the contractor; etc. Findings will be used for analysis to formulate a conclusion, solution, next action and any further decision.
4.7.5 Third Party Monitoring TPM
All WINRIP packages are designed to have external parties involved in conducting an independent assessment of the project throughout construction. Project
information is accessible through the WINRIP website under construction, project information booth which is normally maintained in the PPKSatkerDinas office or,
project announcement billboard at each site. ACAP requires a third party, from outside the project, to independently monitor the progress of construction work of
each link and these personnel are provided by universities nearby each package.
It was decided that the best method of recruitment for TPM was through the universities closest to each package and PMU mailed invitations asking them to
express their interest in forming independent monitoring teams of Third Party Monitors. This concept is based on the fact that UniversitiesTechnical Faculties have
the engineers available for recruitment and Universities could use this opportunity to be involved in public service. It is hoped that this concept will be more effective and
more efficient in getting legitimate, competent, independent Third Party Monitoring TPM.
The duties of a TPM included:
a
Report to the PPK for his intended package and obtain copies of all drawings and contract documentation.
b
Make at least three 3 separate visits to site, with each visit up to four 4 days long, and ascertain that the works are being carried out in compliance
with the drawings and documentation.
c
Prepare and submit a report for the PMU following each visit with their last report post PHO.
4.8 Road Safety Audit
Since the Senior Road Safety Audit Engineer has been mobilized on 1
st
May 2013, technical design review which is AWP2 and AWP-3 sub-projects in aspect of road safety
has been implemented. After completing of technical design review, the report of RSA which is to identify the road safety weaknesses in design during the design and actual
Monthly Progress Report August 2013
Western I ndonesia National Roads I mprovement Project 24
construction and make recommendations for realistic improvements, has been made in response to recommendation of the links for betterment and their implementation under
Annual Works ProgramsAWP-2,3, through site visiting, review of prepared drawing report, had an official meeting with stakeholder which is for Full design review and
technical advisory. The CTC technical design teamhighway road safety audit shall compile all the road safety recommendations in the Road Safety Audit Reports which
shall be part of the technical reports. The RSA report has to be disseminating in particular to the audited packages.
The details of Civil Work in aspect of road safety audit are mentioned in “Chapter 4.1 Detailed Design Preparation” combined with highway part for the Design Stage.
