The Results of the Expert Judgment and Revisions of Unit 1
a The Appropriateness of the Content
The first aspect to be evaluated was the appropriateness of the content. The results of the analysis of the appropriateness of the content of Unit 1 can be
seen as follows:
Table 34: The Table of the Appropriateness of the Content of Unit 1 NO
Items Score
1. The developed materials are in accordance with the core
competences stated in Curriculum 2013 for grade XI students of vocational high school.
4
2. The developed materials are in accordance with the basic
competences stated in Curriculum 2013 for grade XI students of vocational high school.
4
3. The developed materials meet the course grid.
4 4.
The topics of the units of the developed materials are relevant with the grade XI students of Beauty Skin Care study
programme‟s daily life. 4
5. The developed materials involve the explanation of the
structure of a text of a particular genre. 4
6. The developed materials involve the explanation of social
functions of a text of a particular genre. 4
7. The developed materials involve the explanation of linguistic
features of a text of a particular genre. 4
8. The developed materials involve vocabulary learning tasks
which are relevant with the requirement of the curriculum. 3
9. The developed materials involve pronunciation learning tasks
which are relevant with the requirement of the curriculum. 3
10. The developed materials involve learning activities which guide
students to develop their communicative competence in spoken language.
3
11. The developed materials involve learning activities which guide
students to develop their communicative competence in written language.
3
Mean F 3.6
Table 34 shows that the mean value of the appropriateness of the content of Unit 1 is 3.6. This value is in the range of 3.50 ≤ F
≤ 3.75 which is categorized as “Good”.
b The Appropriateness of the Language
The second aspect to be evaluated was the appropriateness of the language. The following table shows the results of the analysis of the
appropriateness of the language of Unit 1.
Table 35: The Table of the Appropriateness of the Language of Unit 1 NO
Items Score
12. The language of explanations and instructions in the
developed materials is in accordance with the grade XI students of beauty skin care programmes‟s cognitive
development. 3
13. The language used in the developed materials is unambiguous
and understandable by the students. 4
14. The language used in the developed materials is
grammatically correct. 3
15. The language used in the developed materials is cohesive and
coherent. 4
16. The developed materials consistently used one variation of
English. 4
Mean F 3.6
Table 35 shows that the mean value of the appropriateness of the language of Unit 1 is 3.6. this value is in the range of 3.50 ≤ F
≤ 3.75. It means that the appropriateness of the language of U
nit 1 is categorized as “Good”.
c The Appropriateness of the Presentation
The next aspect to be evaluated was the appropriateness of the presentation of the developed materials. The results can be seen as follows:
Table 36: The Table of the Appropriateness of the Presentation of Unit 1
17. The developed materials are in accordance with the steps of scientific approach-based learning as required by
Curriculum 2013. 4
18. The developed materials are in accordance with the characteristics of Communicative Language Learning.
4 19. The developed materials are begun with guided tasks and
gradually move to the free production tasks. 3
20. The materials are systematically graded from the easy tasks to more difficult tasks.
4 21. The developed materials encourage learners to actively
interact in English with classmates, teachers, and other people.
4
22. The developed materials encourage students to get involved in spoken communicative events on their own initiative.
4 23. The developed materials encourage students to get involved
in written communicative events on their own initiative. 4
24. The developed materials promote learners to be responsible with their own learning so that they become autonomous
learners. 4
25. The developed materials encourage learners to have self- reflection to identity their achievements and lacks during
their learning. 3
26. Each unit of the developed materials has the learning objective stated.
4 27. Each unit of the developed materials has a summary part
that provides the summary of the learning materials presented in the unit
4
28. Each unit of the developed materials has homework part. 4
29. Each unit of the developed materials has
intermezzo Did
You Know
part that is relevant to the topic. 4
Mean F 3.8
From Table 36, it can be seen that the mean value of the appropriateness of the presentation of Unit 1 is 3.8, which is in the range 3.75 ≤ x ≤ 4. It means
that the appropriateness of the presentation of Unit 1 is categorized as “Very Good”.
d The Appropriateness of the Graphic
The last aspect to be evaluated was the appropriateness of the graphic. The following table shows the results of the analysis of the appropriateness of the
graphic of Unit 1.
Table 37: The Table of the Appropriateness of the Graphic of Unit 1
30. The developed materials are printed on ISO-standardized size papers A4,A5,B5
4 31. The layout of the developed materials is proportional.
3 32. The illustrations and graphic designs in the developed
materials are relevant to the topic and the contents. 4
33. The illustrations and graphic designs in the developed materials are aesthetic and fuctional.
4 34. The illustrations and graphic designs in the developed
materials help to clarify the presentation of the materials. 4
35. The developed materials use the appropriate variation of fonts.
4 36. The developed materials use the right number of variation
bold, italic, underline, capitalization
. 4
37. The overall design of the developed materials is visually interesting.
4
Mean F 3.9
Table 37 shows that the mean value of the appropriateness of the graphic of Unit 1 is 3.9 which is in the range 3.75 ≤ x ≤ 4. It means that the
appropriateness of the graphic of Unit 1 is categorized as “Very Good”.
2 Revisions of Unit 1
The results of the expert judgment show that Unit 1 is appropriate for grade eleven students of Beauty Skin Care study programme. However, there
were some parts need to be revised. The revisions of Unit 1 were about grammatical mistakes, omissions needed, articles, and there was a difference parts
in productive skills stage. The “Observe It” stages were revised into “Let‟s
Listen” and “Let‟s Read”. The “Let‟s Create” stages were also revised into “Let‟s Speak” and “Let‟s Write”. There were some ungrammatical sentences that need to
be revised. For example, the sentence “You can ask to your teacher if you do not understand about the explanation” is ungrammatical. It must be “You can ask
your teacher if you do not understand the explanation”. There are some omi
ssions needed, such as the sentence “What kind of things that comes to your mind when you see those pictures?”. The word “that”
needs to be omitted so it becomes “What kind of things comes to your mind when you see those pictures?”.
There is a difference in the speaking stage, Task 13 and Task 14. Task 13 is revised to be more guided. There are guided steps to make correct sentences in
order to help students in generating a good procedure text, while in Task 14, there is a difference in providing the rubric for students to do a work. In the rubric,
there are points to help students in taking notes what they hear. Then, the points are used to help students in communicating their understanding about the
monologue has been listened. The complete revisions of Unit 1 can be found in
Appendix G.