Time and Place Population and Sample

without in any way setting traps for them can be effectively used to motivate them. 9 The test that is used in this study is pre-test and post-test. a. Pre- test Both classes Controlled Class and Experimental Class were given the test about the material before the class and the teaching begin or conducted before applying cooperative learning method. The writer gave the topic of pre- test is about “The Idol”. The test was conducted on November 5 th 2013. b. Post- test Both classes Controlled Class and Experimental Class were given the material after the class and teaching begins or conducted after applying cooperative learning method. The writer gave the treatment for six meetings in experimental and controlled class. After that the writer gave the post- test of both classes, the topic is about “The interesting places” After pre-test and post-test had been done then the writer gave the score of each student’s writing. To get the writing score the writer used the table of scoring writing, the table as follow: 9 J.B Heaton, op.cit., p. 7. Table 3.1 Table of Scoring Writing Skill Score Level Criteria Conte n t 30-27 - EXCELENT TO VERY GOOD : Knowledgeable, substantive, through development of the thesis, relevant to assigned topic 26-22 - GOOD TO AVERAGE: Some knowledge of subject, adequate range, limited development of thesis, mostly relevant to topic but lack detail 21-17 - FAIR TO GOOD: Limited knowledge of subject, little substance, inadequate development of topic 16-13 - VERY POOR: Does not show knowledge of subject, non substantive, not pertinent, or not enough to evaluate Organi zat ion 20-18 - EXCELENT TO VERY GOOD: Fluent expression, ideas clearly statedsupported, succinct, well organized, logical sequencing, cohesive 17-24 - GOOD TO AVERAGE: Somewhat copy, loosely organized but main idea stand out, limited support, logical; but incomplete sequencing 13-10 - FAIR TO POOR: Non fluent, ideas confused or disconnected, lacks logical sequencing and development 9-7 - VERY POOR: Does not communicate, no organization or not enough to evaluate Vooc ab u lary 20-18 - EXCELENT TO VERY GOOD: Sophisticated range, effective word, idiom choice and usage, word form mastery, appropriate magister 17-14 - GOOD TO AVERAGE: Adequate range, occasional error of word idiom and form, choice, usage but meaning not obscured 13-10 - FAIR TO POOR: Limited range, frequent errors of word idiom form, choice, usage, meaning confused or obscured