The Description of Data

15 50 65 15 16 40 70 30 17 38 60 22 18 50 60 10 19 40 66 26 20 72 73 1 21 30 72 42 22 35 70 35 23 74 76 2 24 31 64 33 25 63 67 4 26 40 67 27 27 30 56 26 28 32 70 38 29 40 67 27 30 35 74 39 31 35 60 25 32 31 68 37 33 30 63 33 34 30 63 33 TOTAL Ʃ γ 1= 1414 Ʃ γ 2= 2172 Ʃ γ= 758 Mean M γ 1= 41.58823529 Mγ 2= 63.88235294 M γ= 22.29411765 There are differences between the pre-test and the post-test score of controlled class. In the pre-test, the lowest score is 30, post-test is 50 and gained score is 0. Besides, the highest score of pre-test is 74, post-test is 78, and gained score is 42. Then, the writer calculated the median score of pre-test is 36.5, post-test is 64.5, and gained score is 36.5. For the mode score of pre-test is 30, post-test is 60, and gained score is 25. Meanwhile the writer calculated the mean score of pre-test is 41.588, post-test is 63.882, and gained score is 22.29.

B. The Data Analysis

This part is intended to answer the research question “Whether there is any influence of teaching descriptive writing by using think pair share technique?”. Here, the writer used SPSS to analysis the t-test score both the experimental and the controlled class. The following table determines the t-test score of experimental and controlled class. 1. Pre-test Before the treatment, the writer conducted the pre-test for experimental and controlled class. Both classes had the same characteristics such as background knowledge. In the pre-test the writer determined the topic about “The idol” based on the syllabus and lesson plan from that school. The mean score of pre-test in the experimental and controlled class can be seen below: Table 4.3 The t-test of pre-test in the experimental and controlled class Mean Score t-test score The experimental class The controlled class M x = 43.26 M y = 41.58 t o = 5.07 The table 4.4 reports the t-test score of pre-test in the experimental and controlled class. There was a significant difference from measurement score in the experimental and the controlled class Mx= 43.26, My= 41.58, SDx= 13.990, SDy= 13.255, t66= 5.07, p=00. It can be concluded that the mean scores of experimental class is higher than the controlled class M x M y 2. Post-test After the t-test of pre-test in the experimental and the controlled class had been known, then in the following table, the writer reports the t- test of post-test in the experimental and the controlled class: Table 4.4 The t-test of post-test in the experimental and controlled class Mean Score t-test score The experimental class The controlled class M x = 77.26 M y = 63.88 t o = 7.78 The table above informed that there was a significant difference from measurement post test score in the experimental and the controlled class M x = 77.26, M y =63.88, SD x =6.712,, SDy= 7.450, t66= 7.782, p=0.00. It can be concluded that the mean of experimental class is higher than controlled class M x M y . This means that the experiment in this study is succesfull. The last, after getting the score of pre-test and post-test score both of the experimental and the controlled class, then the writer calculated the gained score in both of them. The aim of gained score is to know whether there was a significant difference in the gain score between the experimental and the controlled class. It also answers whether the alternative hypothesis Ha is accepted or rejected. In the following table, the t-test calculation by using SPSS: Table 4.5 Group Statistic Group Statistics Group N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean Gained EXP 34 34.00 13.983 2.398 CONTROL 34 22.29 12.189 2.090 Table 4.6 Independent Sample Test Independent Samples Test Levenes Test for Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means F Sig. T Df Sig. 2- tailed Mean Difference Std. Error Difference 95 Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower Upper Gained Equal variances assumed .486 .488 3.680 66 .000 11.706 3.181 5.354 18.057 Equal variances not assumed 3.680 64.794 .000 11.706 3.181 5.352 18.060 The table by using SPSS above shows that there was a significant difference of the gain scores between the experimental class and the controlled class. As written in the table for mean score of experimental class M x = 34.00 and the controlled class is M y = 22.29. Meanwhile, for standard of deviation score of experimental class is SD x = 13.983 and the controlled class is SD y = 12.186. From the result of gain mean score and standard deviation of experimental and controlled class by using SPSS then the writer compared the data by using manual formula. The results by using SPSS and manual formula are the same. The following table is the result of the comparison score of experimental and controlled class. Table 4.8 The comparison score of experimental class and controlled class Students X Y X-MX Y-MX X-MX 2 Y-MX 2 1 42 10 8 -12 64 144 2 19 1 -15 -21 225 441 3 44 6 10 -16 100 256 4 53 20 19 -2 361 4 5 47 18 13 -4 169 16 6 36 29 2 7 4 49 7 58 25 24 3 576 9 8 43 25 9 3 81 9 9 37 25 3 3 9 9 10 52 31 18 9 324 81 11 33 -1 -22 1 484 12 35 10 1 -12 1 144 13 40 28 6 6 36 36 14 52 25 18 3 324 9 15 44 15 10 -7 100 49 16 20 30 -14 8 196 64 17 4 22 -30 900 18 34 10 -12 144 19 37 26 3 4 9 16 20 22 1 -12 -21 144 441 21 27 42 -7 20 49 400 22 20 35 -14 13 196 169 23 20 2 -14 -20 196 400 24 6 33 -28 11 784 121 25 6 4 -28 -18 784 324 26 22 27 -12 5 144 25 27 29 26 -5 4 25 16

Dokumen yang terkait

Applying Think-aloud Technique in Improving Students' Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text (Quasi Experimental Study of Tenth Grade Students of SMK Bhakti 17 Jagakarsa)

0 11 119

The Effectiveness Of Using Clustering Technique Towards Students’ Descriptive Writing (A Quasi-Experimental Study Of The Second Grade Students At Mts. Nurul Hidayah For Academic Year 2013-2014)

0 6 112

The effectiveness of teaching descriptive text using picture media on students ability: an experimental study in the tenth grade of SMK Tunas Grafika Informatika Jakarta

2 17 68

The effectiveness of using mind mapping technique toward comprehension of descriptive text: an experimental study at the seventh grade of SMP Pelita YNH Sukabumi

1 8 76

The Influence Of Cooperative Learning In Teaching Descriptive Writing : An Experimental study at the Second Year of SMPN 5 Bekasi

0 9 103

The effectiveness of using scaffolding technique towards students’ skill in writing descriptive text: a quasi-experimental study of eight grade of SMP Al-Zahra Indonesia

1 14 105

The effectiveness of using jigsaw technique in teaching narrative text (an experimental study of the second grade students of MTs Pembangunan Nurul Islam – Tangerang Selatan)

0 8 0

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING GIVE ONE, TAKE ONE TECHNIQUE FOR TEACHING WRITING OF DESCRIPTIVE TEXT (Quasi Experimental Study of the Tenth Grade Students of SMA N 1 Purwodadi in the A

0 14 108

Improving students’ skill in writing descriptive text through clustering technique: a pre-experiment research at the second grade of MTs Khazanah Kebajikan Tangerang Selatan

0 4 98

The effectiveness of teaching the present perfect tense through games: an experimental study at the tenth grade students of MA Jam’iyyah Islamiyyah Pondok Aren South – Tangerang

0 11 109