Referring Verbs Relative Pronouns

1a in 1b problemdifficultychallengepriority 1c theso 1d difficultproblematicchallenging 1e HoweverNextThen 1f or 1g improves 1h beginstendsseems 1i inafter 1j they 1k easilywelleffectively 1l thirdfurther 1m most 1n sincebecauseas 1o on 1p why 1q necessarybetterusefulhelpful 1r an 1s before 1t their Writing Test 3 Note comments in Writing Test 1 above. 3a somewhere 3b from 3c who 3d kindstypessortscategories 3e AlmostNearlyVirtually 3f halls 3g makefind 3h convenientpracticalsensible 3i butalthoughthough 3j rather 3k a 3l This 3m maymightcancouldshould 3n also 3o on 3p assincebecause 3q be 3r vitalimportantessentialcritical 3s an 3t them Writing Test 4 Model answer: A COMPARISON OF BORCHESTER AND ROWBOROUGH AS A STUDY LOCATION Rowborough is a large industrial city with a population of one and a half million, whereas Borchester is an old city with a much smaller population. These basic differences determine their suitability as centres for a university course. Rowborough can offer a wider range of leisure facilities but Borchester has a quieter character. Rowborough may have a worse climate, being cool even in summer and wet in winter, while winters in Borchester are less cold, though the summers tend to be wet. Rowborough is hillier than Borchester, which might be a drawback for cyclists. However, Rowborough does have a better public transport system, which may compensate for the hills. Borchester also has a rather remote campus, which might involve a lot of travelling. It is also likely to be more expensive in terms of accommodation, and is rather distant from the capital. On the other hand, some areas in Rowborough suffer from high crime rates. Clearly, each city has its advantages: Borchester is more likely to suit a student looking for peace and quiet, who can tolerate some inconvenience, while Rowborough would be suitable for someone keen to economise and wanting a more lively atmosphere. Sources Quotations from the following articles will be found in various units. As the quotations have been made to give examples of language, rather than for reasons of content, in-text references are not made. Ardila, A. 2001. Predictors of university academic performance in Colombia. International Journal of Educational Research 35 4: 411–417 Bardet, J.-P. 2001. Early marriage in pre-modern France. The History of the Family 6 3 345–363 Benoit, D., Madigan, S., Lecce, S., Shea, B. and Goldberg, S. 2001. Atypical maternal behaviour toward feeding-disordered infants before and after intervention. Infant Mental Health Journal 22 6: 611–626 Chakrabarti, S. and Chakrabarti, S. Rural electrification programme with solar energy in remote region – a case study in an island. Energy Policy 30 1: 33–42 Creeber, G. 2001. ‘Taking our personal lives seriously’: intimacy, continuity and memory in the television serial. Media, Culture Society 23: 439–455 Davis, G. 2002. Is the claim that ‘variance kills’ an ecological fallacy? Accident Analysis and Prevention 34 3: 343–346 Dündar, Ö. 2001. Models of urban transformation. Informal housing in Ankara. Cities 18 6: 391–401 Grant, J., Meller, W. and Urevig, B. 2001. Changes in psychiatric consultations over ten years. General Hospital Psychiatry 23 5: 261–265 Hendry, E. 2001. Masonry walls: materials and constructions. Construction and Building Materials 15 8: 323–330 Horton, E., Folland, C. and Parker, D. 2001. The changing incidence of extremes in worldwide and central England temperatures to the end of the twentieth century. Climatic Change 50: 267–295 Job, N., van Exel, A. and Rietveld, P. 2001. Public transport strikes and traveller behaviour. Transport Policy 8 4: 237–246 Kinder, T. 2001. The use of call centres by local public administrations. Futures 33 10: 837–860 Marxsen, C. 2001. Potential world garbage and waste carbon sequestration. Environmental Science Policy 4 6: 293–300 Nazarov, V., Radostin, A. and Stepanyants, Y. 2001. Influence of water content in river sand on the self-brightening of acoustic waves. Applied Acoustics 62 12: 1347–1358 O’Sullivan, D. 2002. Framework for managing business development in the networked organisation. Computers in Industry 47 1: 77–88 Otero, J. and Milas, C. 2001. Modelling the spot prices of various coffee types. Economic Modelling 18 4: 625–641