38
closed type of questionnaire which provides alternative of answer. However, the respondents could give additional answer by their own. The writer presented the
complete questionnaire and interview for needs survey on the appendix C.
3. The Needs Survey Data
The writer presented the data of respondents including the teacher and students’ opinion about the condition of teaching speaking in classroom and the
students’ behavior toward learning speaking. The writer presented the result of data from interview with the English teachers in the form of conclusion. Unlike the
interview, the result of questionnaire was described in the form of percentage.
4. The Needs Survey Data Analysis
The data taken from needs survey was divided into two categories. The first one was data from interview with the English teachers. The result would be shown in
the sentence which would be concluded. The second data was taken from open- closed questionnaire taken from the students. The result of the data would be
calculated by percentage as follows:
n x
100
Σn
note: n : The number of respondents who chose certain answer
Σn
: The total number of respondent PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
39
B. FEEDBACK GATHERING
The feedback gathering was employed in order to obtain participants feedback and contribution in order to develop final version of designed materials.
This step was really beneficial since the writer needed to know whether or not the designed materials were appropriate to teach the second grade students of language
program. 1.
The Feedback Gathering Respondents
Evaluating the designed materials, the writer chose the respondents as follows:
a. The second grade English teachers of language program at SMA Stella
Duce 1 Yogyakarta. Directly involving in learning process as facilitator in classroom, it was
necessary to have teacher’s opinions whether or not the designed materials were suitable for teaching the second grade students of language
program. b.
The English lecturers of Language Education Program in Sanata Dharma University
Being experienced in teaching English, their knowledge was valuable to evaluate the designed materials. It is expected that their contribution
would represent all of the English lecturers in Sanata Dharma University.
2. The Feedback Gathering Instruments
To gather feedback from the respondents, the writer used closed questionnaire. The data would be presented in the following table:
40
Table 3.1: The Sample of Feedback Gathering Result from Questionnaire
Respondents No
Respondents’ Opinion on 1 2 3 4 5
The writer presented the complete questionnaire of feedback gathering on the appendix D.
3. The Feedback Gathering Data
The writer presented two kinds of data. The first one is the data about the respondents’ educational background and their years of teaching experiences. The
second data is the descriptive statistic data about the respondents’ opinion and suggestion toward designed materials. The Descriptive data would be presented in
the following table: Table 3.2:
The Sample of Descriptive Data of Respondents’ Opinion
Central Tendencies No
Respondents’ Opinion N Mean Median Mode
note: N : Number of Respondents
4. The Feedback Gathering Data Analysis
In this study, the closed questionnaire of respondents’ opinion used the 5 point agreement:
