Designing Materials The Elaboration of Steps in Designing a Set of Writing Instructional

Table 4.3: The writer’s unit development Unit Topic Title Unit 1 Invitations Let’s Go to the Party Unit 2 Short Messages Attention, Please Unit 3 Announcements Check This One Out Unit 4 Describing Animals In The Zoo Unit 5 Describing People Celebrity Wanna Be Unit 6 Describing Places Go On A Wonderful Trip Unit 7 Biographical Recount From Zero To Hero Unit 8 Personal Recount You’ve Got Mail

8. Evaluating the Designed Materials

After designing the materials, the writer distributed the questionnaires to the evaluators to find out the opinions, weaknesses, strengths, suggestions and criticisms on the designed materials. Questionnaires were aimed at getting feedback to improve the materials. Those included the designed materials, the syllabus, and the example of the lesson plan. The questionnaires were distributed to the five evaluators on April 22, 2010 and were collected a week after. Questionnaires consisted of fifteen statements in close questionnaire and four questions in open questionnaire. a. The Description of the Evaluator The evaluators of the post design survey were two English teachers of SMPN 1 Kalikotes Klaten, an English teacher of SMPN 1 Ngawen Klaten, a lecturer of English Education Study Program of Sanata Dharma University and an English instructor of Speak First course in Klaten. The evaluators gave judgments whether the proposed a set of instructional materials was accepted or not. The Table 4.4 below describes the evaluators of the post design survey. Table 4.4: The results of pre-design survey Evaluators Educational Background Teaching Experience in Years S1 S2 S3 Other 5 5-10 10-15 15 English teachers 3 1 2 English instructor 1 1 English lecturer 1 1 b. The Data Presentation of the Result Since the questionnaire distributed to evaluate the materials consisted of closed-form and open form items, there are two kinds of data to be presented in this section. The first data was presented in form of level of agreements as closed- form items. The number and degree of agreement are as follows. 1 = Strongly Disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Agree 4 = Strongly Agree

Dokumen yang terkait

Designing a set of speaking instructional materials using mind mapping for the 11th grade students of SMA N 1 Ngaglik.

0 0 177

Designing a set of writing materials using EGRA technique for the Eighth grade students of SMPN 15 Yogyakarta.

0 2 157

Designing a set of instructional speaking materials using contextual teaching and learning for the eighth grade students of SMPN 2 Ponjong Gunungkidul.

0 1 189

Designing a set of English instructional writing materials using taks-based language learning for the tenth grade students of SMA Santa Maria Yogyakarta.

0 0 131

Designing a set of spoken instructional materials using language games for the fourth grade students of SDN Ambarukmo Yogyakarta.

0 0 158

Designing a set of writing instructional materials using multiple intelligences theory for the tenth grade students of Santa Maria High School.

0 0 190

Designing a set of instructional speaking materials using contextual teaching and learning for the eighth grade students of SMPN 2 Ponjong Gunungkidul

0 0 187

Designing a set of speaking instructional materials using mind mapping for the 11th grade students of SMA N 1 Ngaglik

0 0 175

DESIGNING A SET OF WRITING INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS USING MIND MAPPING FOR THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMPN 1 KALIKOTES KLATEN A THESIS Presented as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements to Obtain the Sarjana Pendidikan Degree in English Language Educat

0 1 183

DESIGNING A SET OF WRITING INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS USING MIND MAPPING FOR THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMPN 1 KALIKOTES KLATEN A THESIS Presented as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements to Obtain the Sarjana Pendidikan Degree in English Language Educat

0 0 183