the designed materials. It could be concluded that the writer’s framework and R D framework were match each other.
B. Research Respondents
There were two groups of this survey. The first group was involved in pre- design survey intended to gain information about the learners’ needs. The second
group was involved in post-design survey intended to gain feedback on the proposed materials design in order to revise the materials to be best facilitated the learners’
needs.
1. Respondents of the Needs Survey
To collect the data for the needs survey, the researcher involved the eleventh grade students of SMKN 2 Depok Sleman Yogyakarta by distributing a
questionnaire. It was because the course program was designed based on their needs and interests.
2. Respondents of the Evaluation Survey
The researcher designed the writing materials based on the learners’ needs analysis. Nevertheless, the proposed materials needed to be evaluated by the qualified
and competent respondents in order to present the final version which best facilitated the students’ needs and interests. Therefore, there were two kinds of respondents.
a. English Teachers of SMKN 2 Depok Sleman. English Teachers of SMKN Depok Sleman are the ones who understand the
real condition of the students and the class situation because they are wholly involved PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
in the teaching learning situation. Thus, the researcher wanted to involve them as the interviewees in pre-design survey to gain as many information as possible through
informal interview in order to find out the students’ needs based on their opinions. Furthermore, the reseacher also distributed a questionnaire in order to gain
evaluation, suggestion, and judgment for the proposed materials. b. Lecturers of English Education Study Program
Lecturer who teaches related to the research such as Language Teaching Methodology, Language Teaching Strategies, Curriculum and Material Development,
Instructional Design, and teaching writing were also chosen to be the respondents of this research. Thus, the researcher distributed the second questionnaire to two
lecturers of English Education Study Program of Sanata Dharma University intended to obtain evaluation for the proposed materials. The description of the respondents of
designed materials evaluation is presented in table 3.1.
Table 3.1. Description of the respondents blank Sex Educational
Background Teaching Experience
in years F M D3 S1 S2 S3 1-5 6-10 11-15
16 English teachers
English lecturers
C. Research Setting
