Table 46. The Result of Expert Judgment towards Technical Quality
Point Statement
Score 1.
Choice of background 4
2. Types and sizes of font
4 3.
Composition of background colours 5
4. Composition of text colours
4 5.
Accuracy of choice of pictures 4
6. Quality of pictures
4 7.
The use of navigation buttons 5
8. The display of the animation
4 9.
Choice of sounds 4
Total Score 38
Mean 4.22
The table shows the mean of the technical quality of the developed interactive
learning multimedia is 4.22. Based on the quantitative data conversion used in this study, it is categorized as “Very Good” since the mean is more than 4.2.
d. The Expert Judgment towards Media Quality
The questionnaire for assessing media quality contains eight points that were used as the considerations for the expert to assess. These are the points listed
in the following table and completed by the result of the expert judgment.
Table 47. The Result of Expert Judgment towards Media Quality
Point Statements
Score 1.
Interactivity level between students and media 5
2. Ease of interaction to media
5 3.
Clarity of program navigation structure 5
4. Clarity of instruction to use the program
5 5.
Setting of animation 4
6. Accuracy of animation
4 7.
Split of materials 4
8. Efficiency of the use of text
4
Total Score 36
Mean 4.5
The mean score for instructional quality of developed interactive learning
multimedia is 4.5 which indicates that the instructional quality is categorized as “Very Good” because the mean is more than 4.2.
5. Suggestions and Revision
The material and media expert not only gave scores towards the interactive learning multimedia but also gave some suggestions. The suggestions have been
taken as the consideration for revising the multimedia. The following table tells about the suggestions and action taken by the researcher in revising the
multimedia both material and media aspects.
a. Suggestions from Material Expert and the Revision
Table 48. Suggestions from Material Expert and Action Taken
No. Aspect Evaluated
Suggestion Action Taken
1. Example to explain the
concepts The examples of the
explanation in the Study Page section
should be in the form of descriptive
sentences. The examples of the
explanation in the Study Page section
have been changed into descriptive
sentences.
2. Identical indicator
Eliminate one of those indicators.
One of the identical indicators has been
eliminated.
3. Relevance between
material and indicator “reading aloud”
Add task related to the indicator “reading
aloud”. Tasks related to
indicator “reading aloud” have been
added into the Units. 4. Relevance between
Add task related to the Tasks related to
