The Normality of the Data

b. Normality of the Controlled Class The hypothesis can be seen as follows: H o : The data of Y is normally distributed. H a : The data of Y is not normally distributed. 1. Normality of the Pre-test s 2 = Σ f n − [ Σ f n ] = − [ ] = 3815.93 −[ . ] = 3815.93 − . = . SD = √ . = 12.33 x ̅= 60.53 T table = 0.161 T max = 0.116 The result showed that T max T table 0.116 0.161. It can be concluded that in the significant degree of 0.05, H o is accepted. It means that the data is normally distributed. 2 2 2. Normality of the Post-test s 2 = Σ f n − [ Σ f n ] = − [ ] = 4122.37 −[ . ] = 4122.37 − . = 182.3 SD = √ . = 13.50 x̅= 62.77 T table = 0.161 T max = 0.1264 The result showed that T max T table 0.1264 0.161. It can be concluded that in the significant degree of 0.05, H o is accepted. It means that the data is normally distributed.

2. The Homogeneity of the Data

Based on the normality calculation by using Lillyfors formula, the writer got the result that the data of pre-test and post-test in both experimental class and control class was normally distributed. Then, the writer calculated the homogeneity of the data. The hypothesis can be seen as follows: H o : The sample of experimental class and controlled class is not different. H a : The sample of experimental class and controlled class is different. 2 2 2 The criteria of the test: H o : F F αn1-1,n2-1 H a : F F αn1-1,n2-1 - If F F αn1-1,n2-1 , it means that the sample of experimental class and controlled class in not different. H o is accepted and H a is rejected. - If F F αn1-1,n2-1 , it means that the sample of experimental class and controlled class is different. H o is rejected and H a is accepted. The formula used can be seen as follows: F = �ℎ� ℎ��ℎ� � �� �� �ℎ� � � � �� �� or F =

a. Homogeneity of Pre-test Scores

F = . . F = 1.634 n1-1 = 30 - 1 = 29 n2-1 = 30 – 1 = 29 F 0.05n1-1,n2-1 = 1.854 F table Based on the calculation, it can be seen that F F αn1-1,n2-1 1.643 1.854. It means that the sample of experimental class and controlled class pre-test is homogeneous. H o is accepted and H a is rejected.

b. Homogeneity of Post-test Scores

F = . . F = 1.3735 n1-1 = 30 - 1 = 29 n2-1 = 30 – 1 = 29 F 0.05n1-1,n2-1 = 1.854 F table Based on the calculation, it can be seen that F F αn1-1,n2-1 1.3735 1.854. It means that the sample of experimental class and controlled class post-test is homogeneous. H o is accepted and H a is rejected.

C. Hypothesis Testing

The writer analyzed the data by using T-test formula. The aim of this technique is useful to prove whether there is any significant difference between students’ vocabulary in experiment and controlled class statistically. The experiment class was X variable and the controlled class was Y variable. The writer needed to make the calculation table, to find out the value of mean, standard deviation and standard error of each variable, before the writer calculated t-test. Table 4.3 The Result of Gained Score in Experimental and Controlled Class Student Score x y x² y² X Y 1 36 14.77 -2.23 218.15 4.97 2 20 4 -1.23 1.77 1.51 3.13 3 10 -11.23 -2.23 126.11 4.97 4 4 3 -17.23 0.77 296.87 0.59 5 26 -6 4.77 -8.23 22.75 67.73 6 24 -3 2.77 -5.23 7.67 27.35 7 10 -11.23 -2.23 126.11 4.97 8 30 -10 8.77 -12.23 76.91 149.57 9 -6 -6 -27.23 -8.23 741.47 67.73 10 40 18.77 -2.23 352.31 4.97 11 16 -10 -5.23 -12.23 27.35 149.57 12 36 6 14.77 3.77 218.15 14.21 13 20 -1.23 -2.23 1.51 4.97 14 33 11.77 -2.23 138.53 4.97 15 14 -21.23 11.77 450.71 138.53 16 17 10 -4.23 7.77 17.89 60.37 17 40 4 18.77 1.77 352.31 3.13 18 34 4 12.77 1.77 163.07 3.13 19 26 7 4.77 4.77 22.75 22.75 20 37 10 15.77 7.77 248.69 60.37 21 16 16 -5.23 13.77 27.35 189.61 22 34 -3 12.77 -5.23 163.07 27.35 23 20 -4 -1.23 -6.23 1.51 38.81 24 17 -7 -4.23 -9.23 17.89 85.19 25 16 10 -5.23 7.77 27.35 60.37 26 23 1.77 -2.23 3.13 4.97 27 -12 6 -33.23 3.77 1104.23 14.21

Dokumen yang terkait

The effectiveness of using games towards students' vocabulary mastery: a quasi-experimental study at the eighth grade students' of SMP Darussalam, Pondok Labu, Jakarta.

0 10 98

The Effectiveness Of Using Pictures For Teaching Vocabulary : pre experimental at the fourth grade of SDN Pamulang Permai - Pamulang

0 4 58

The Effectiveness of Using Card Games Technique in Teaching Vocabulary (A Quasi Experimental Study at the Seventh Grade of SMP Negeri 18 Tangerang)

1 4 125

The Effectiveness Of Using Reading, Encoding, Annotating And Pondering (Reap) Technique Towards Students’ Reading Skill Of Descriptive Text (A Quasi-Experimental Study At The Seventh Grade Of Mts Salafiyah)

5 18 138

The effectiveness of extensive reading towards students' vocabulary mastery: a quasi-experimental study at the seventh grade students of SMP Darussalam Pondok Labu Jakarta.

0 14 0

The effectiveness of using games to improve students' vocabulary (a quasi-experimental study at the tenth grade students of SMA Nusantara 1 Tangerang)

0 3 138

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING NEAR-PEER ROLE MODELING (NPRM) ON STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the First Grade of SMPN 3 South Tangerang)

0 32 113

The effectiveness of using english songs from youtube towards students’ vocabulary mastery : a quasi-experimental study at the seventh grade of Ruhama Islamic Junior High School at South Tangerang

1 13 131

The Effectiveness of Crossword Puzzle Game towards Students' Vocabulary Mastery (A Quasi-Experimental Study at Second Grade of Students of SMP Puspita Bangsa Ciputat)

1 22 112

The Effect of Using Flashcards on Students' Vocabulary Achievement (A Quasi-experimental Study at the Seventh Grade Students of SMPN 178 Jakarta)

0 10 102