Data Description RESEARCH FINDING AND INTERPRETATION

Table 4.2 The Score of Pre-test and Post-test Controlled Class Student Pre-test Post-test Gained Score 1 56 56 2 46 50 4 3 70 70 4 60 63 3 5 56 50 -6 6 53 50 -3 7 76 76 8 60 50 -10 9 56 50 -6 10 56 56 11 66 56 -10 12 60 66 6 13 80 80 14 66 66 15 46 60 14 16 80 90 10 17 76 80 4 18 56 60 4 19 36 43 7 20 36 46 10 21 70 86 16 22 46 43 -3 23 60 56 -4 24 73 66 -7 25 80 90 10 26 66 66 27 40 46 6 28 60 66 6 29 70 76 6 30 60 70 10 Total 1816 1883 67 Mean 60.53

62.77 2.23

The table 4.2 above described that the mean of the pre-test in the controlled class was 60.53. Besides, the mean of the post-test was 62.77. The highest score in pre-test was 80 and the lowest score in pre-test was 36. While, the highest score in post-test was 90 and the lowest score in post-test was 43. This is the histogram graph. Figure 4.2 Graph of Students’ Pre-test and Post-test Score in Controlled Class

B. Data Analysis

The writer analyzed the normality and homogeneity of the data before analyzing the t-test. The normality of the data was needed in order to see whether the data was normally distributed in experimental class and the controlled class or it was not normally distributed. Then, the writer calculated the homogeneity of the data. The homogeneity of the data was needed to see whether the data were homogenous or heterogeneous.

1. The Normality of the Data

The writer used Lillyfors formula to test the normality of the data. The result could be seen by comparing the value of T max to T table . The maximum dispute T got from the calculation must be in positive value +. 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 S tu d e n t 1 S tu d e n t 2 S tu d e n t 3 S tu d e n t 4 S tu d e n t 5 S tu d e n t 6 S tu d e n t 7 S tu d e n t 8 S tu d e n t 9 S tu d e n t 10 S tu d e n t 11 S tu d e n t 12 S tu d e n t 13 S tu d e n t 14 S tu d e n t 15 S tu d e n t 16 S tu d e n t 17 S tu d e n t 18 S tu d e n t 1 9 S tu d e n t 20 S tu d e n t 21 S tu d e n t 22 S tu d e n t 23 S tu d e n t 24 S tu d e n t 25 S tu d e n t 26 S tu d e n t 27 S tu d e n t 28 S tu d e n t 29 S tu d e n t 3 Students Score in Controlled Class Pre-test Post-test The criteria of the hypothesis are: H 1 : T T table H o : T T table - If T max T table , H o is rejected and H a is accepted. It means that the data of X is not normally distributed. - If T max T table , H o is accepted and H a is rejected. It means that the data of X is normally distributed. The hypothesis can be seen as follows: H o : The data of X is normally distributed. H a : The data of X is not normally distributed. a. Normality of the Experimental Class 1. Normality of the Pre-test s 2 = Σ f n − [ Σ f n ] = − [ ] = . − [ . ] = . − . = . SD = √ . = 9.64 x̅ = 54.73 2 2 2 T table = 0.161 T max = 0.12793 The result showed that T max T table 0.12793 0.161. It can be concluded that in the significant degree of 0.05, H o is accepted. It means that the data is normally distributed. 2. Normality of the Post-test The hypothesis can be seen as follows: H o : The data of X is normally distributed. H a : The data of X is not normally distributed. s 2 = Σ f n − [ Σ f n ] = − [ ] = . − [ . ] = 5904.16 − . = . SD = √ . = 11.52 x̅ = 75.97 T table = 0.161 T max = 0.0922 The result showed that T max T table 0.0922 0.161. It can be concluded that in the significant degree of 0.05, H o is accepted. It means that the data is normally distributed. 2 2 2 b. Normality of the Controlled Class The hypothesis can be seen as follows: H o : The data of Y is normally distributed. H a : The data of Y is not normally distributed. 1. Normality of the Pre-test s 2 = Σ f n − [ Σ f n ] = − [ ] = 3815.93 −[ . ] = 3815.93 − . = . SD = √ . = 12.33 x ̅= 60.53 T table = 0.161 T max = 0.116 The result showed that T max T table 0.116 0.161. It can be concluded that in the significant degree of 0.05, H o is accepted. It means that the data is normally distributed. 2 2

Dokumen yang terkait

The effectiveness of using games towards students' vocabulary mastery: a quasi-experimental study at the eighth grade students' of SMP Darussalam, Pondok Labu, Jakarta.

0 10 98

The Effectiveness Of Using Pictures For Teaching Vocabulary : pre experimental at the fourth grade of SDN Pamulang Permai - Pamulang

0 4 58

The Effectiveness of Using Card Games Technique in Teaching Vocabulary (A Quasi Experimental Study at the Seventh Grade of SMP Negeri 18 Tangerang)

1 4 125

The Effectiveness Of Using Reading, Encoding, Annotating And Pondering (Reap) Technique Towards Students’ Reading Skill Of Descriptive Text (A Quasi-Experimental Study At The Seventh Grade Of Mts Salafiyah)

5 18 138

The effectiveness of extensive reading towards students' vocabulary mastery: a quasi-experimental study at the seventh grade students of SMP Darussalam Pondok Labu Jakarta.

0 14 0

The effectiveness of using games to improve students' vocabulary (a quasi-experimental study at the tenth grade students of SMA Nusantara 1 Tangerang)

0 3 138

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING NEAR-PEER ROLE MODELING (NPRM) ON STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the First Grade of SMPN 3 South Tangerang)

0 32 113

The effectiveness of using english songs from youtube towards students’ vocabulary mastery : a quasi-experimental study at the seventh grade of Ruhama Islamic Junior High School at South Tangerang

1 13 131

The Effectiveness of Crossword Puzzle Game towards Students' Vocabulary Mastery (A Quasi-Experimental Study at Second Grade of Students of SMP Puspita Bangsa Ciputat)

1 22 112

The Effect of Using Flashcards on Students' Vocabulary Achievement (A Quasi-experimental Study at the Seventh Grade Students of SMPN 178 Jakarta)

0 10 102