Discriminating Power Item Difficulty

Next, the classification of difficulty item: 14 ID REMARK – 0.30 High 0.30 – 0.79 Medium 0.80 – 1.00 Low

K. Criteria of the Action Success

The writer and the teacher discussed to determine the criteria of the action success. This study is regarded successful if 75 numbers of students can pass the KKM. 15 The KKM in the school is 65 sixty five. If the study passes the criteria, thus it is called successful and CAR would be finished, but if it does not pass the criteria, it is called not successful and needs improvement to continue to the next cycle. 14 John W. Oller, Language Test at School, London: Longman Group Limited, 1979, p. 247. 15 Syaiful Bahri Djamarah dan Aswan Zain, Strategi Belajar Mengajar, Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta, 2006 p. 108. 43

CHAPTER IV RESULT AND DISCUSSION

This chapter presents result of the study. In this case, it discussed the way to develop students’ reading comprehension of descriptive text by using group work at VII – 1 class of MTsN 19 Pinang Kalijati academic year 20102011.

A. Before Implementing the Action

There are three parts related to before implementing the action. Those are pre- observation, pre-interview, and pre-test. Those explanations as following:

1. Result of Pre Interview

Pre interview conducted in this study was the unstructured interview that was held on Monday 25 th October 2010 and started at 09.30 A.M and finished at 10.30 A.M. The writer asked to the teacher some questions which was divided into three categories. Those were the general condition in English classroom primarily on situation of the classroom, students’ responses in learning English and students’ achievement of the English test, students’ difficulties in reading comprehension ability, and the teacher’s strategies that he used before Classroom Action Research CAR to solve students’ difficulties in reading comprehension. First category discussed about the general condition in English class primarily on situation of the classroom, students’ responses in learning English and students’ achievement of the English test. Based on the teacher explanation, situation of students in the classroom was very crowded and noisy because there were forty six students inside the classroom. But when they studied in the morning, situation of the classroom was not so noisy because they still felt fresh and could concentrate in studying English. On the other hand, they felt bored and uncomfortable when they studied English in the afternoon. Therefore they did not focus on the teacher explanation and became so noisy. Besides, some students felt enthusiastic in learning English and most of them were students who liked English lesson. But other students did not feel the same thing because they did not like English lesson or felt English was so complicated. Consequently, they were not enthusiastic and lazy in learning English. Furthermore, the teacher said that most of them still got the score under the Minimum Mastery Criterion – Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM and they were hardly to pass it. The second category discussed about the students’ difficulties in reading comprehension. The teacher told that reading skill was one of the most difficult faced by students in learning English. Some students in VII - 1 class felt that reading could make them dizzy, because when they were asked to comprehend kinds of longer texts which consist of some paragraph, they did not understand to convey the meaning of word by word, although they were able to recognize the words. Next, the teacher assumed that they were hardly to concentrate when reading activity because the class was noisy especially in the afternoon which might be caused by some students who did not like English lesson. In brief, the teacher thought that all students got difficulties because they got less practice in reading. These problems had to be solved because reading skill was needed by students to comprehend many reading texts that they will

Dokumen yang terkait

DEVELOPING THE STUDENTS ABILITY IN READING COMPREHENSION THROUGH COMPERATIVE LEARNING OF THE FIRST YEAR STUDENTS AT SLTP NEGERI I LUMAJANG IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 1999/2000

1 4 40

Improvingstudents’ Reading Comprehension Of Narrative Text Through Jigsaw Technique (A Classroomaction Researchin The Second Grade Students Of Smp Ash-Sholihin Kebon Jeruk)

0 11 99

Improving the students’ Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text through Story Mapping

3 28 105

The Effectiveness of Using CIRC Technique to improve Students’ Reading Comprehension on Recount Text(Pre Experimental Study at Second Year Students of MTsN Rajeg)

0 4 113

Improving student's reading comprehention of narrative text through story mapping (a classroom action research at eight grade students of SMP PGRI 2 Ciputat)

0 17 0

The Effectiveness Of Using Collaborative Strategic Reading (Csr) On Students' Reading Comprehension Of Narrative Text" (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the First Grade ofSMA Mathia 'ul Huda Parung PanjangBogor in Academic Year of 201412015),

4 36 111

EMPLOYING QUESTION – ANSWER RELATIONSHIPS (QAR) STRATEGY TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION (A Classroom Action Research at the Eleventh Year Students of SMA Negeri 1 Rangkasbitung in 2012/2013 Academic Year)

5 22 256

Improving Students' Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text through Group Work Technique (A Classroom Action Research at the Eight Grade of SMPN 13 Tangerang Selatan)

0 3 98

The Effect of Video Game towards Students' Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text; (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the Eighth Grade Students' of SMP Negeri 96 Jakarta in the Academic Year of 2015/2016)

1 28 129

ENHANCING THE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION OF DESCRIPTIVE TEXT BY USING QUANTUM READING AT THE STUDENTS OF CLASS VIII G OF MTs N 1 KUDUS IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR 20132014 (A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH) SKRIPSI

0 0 21