c. Observing
In this phase, the real teacher as the observer had a duty to monitor all activities in the classroom. It might be about the teacher’s performance,
class situation, and students’ response. Related to the teacher’s
performance, she had taught in line with the lesson plan had been made. On the other hand, when the teacher divided students into eight groups, it
washed time because the teacher could not control all students in choosing their own group. It could be seen, situation of the classroom was noisy.
Then, when students started to work in their own group, some of the students did not do their task. In fact, they walked to cheat or to disturb the
other groups. They also did not pay attention to their task. And then they just chatted one another without shared about the text. Next, they gave up
if they found unfamiliar words. Then, the teacher only paid attention for some groups not all groups. Therefore, they could not finish their task on
time and could not cooperate well. Moreover, there were found some students who shared with their
group in discussing the text and answering the teacher’s questions correctly related to the schematic structures and language features based
on the text. In the second action of the first cycle, the students seemed more enthusiastic and focus to comprehend the text with their group.
Then, the teacher could control and monitor all groups. After teaching learning process finished, in this observing phase was also carried out the
posttest 1 exactly on the second action of the first cycle to measure how well the students’ reading comprehension of descriptive text that had been
studied. Based on the result of the posttest 1, the data showed that the mean score of pretest was 64.34. There were 30 students who passed the
Minimum Mastery Criterion – Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal KKM 65
sixty five. Meanwhile the other 16 students did not pass that criterion.
Kategori