Advantages of Group Work

The last, there is some evidence that students like to work in smaller groupings. 45 On the other word, there is some evidence that students feels enjoy and happy to work in a group, they may think that working with group gives the freedom for them to reveal their opinion. From Mc Donough’s explanation, the writer sums up that group work has many advantages. Those are students get the flexibility to share the ideas and to exchange the information, and then the classroom may become more dynamic, next they may increase their spoken language actively, finally group work creates an effective climate and cohesive whole class environment in the class room, therefore, students like to work in group. For Harmer the advantages of group work; first, group work increases opportunity for individual students to talk. 46 Thus, group work gives individual students chance to talk increasingly, and then it may give students enjoyable in speaking. Second, group work consists of two or more students that have less problematic in their personal relationships and also have a greater chance of different opinions and varied contributions. 47 It means that group work has advantages to share different opinion one another without including students’ personal relationships and to give varied contributions. Then, group work encourages students to develop their skills of cooperation and negotiation, and also more private than work in front of the whole class. 48 On the other hand, students have to possess ability of cooperation and negotiation in learning. Thus, the teacher uses group work that may give them more chance to cooperate and to negotiate with others. Next, students have autonomy and are allowed to make their own decisions without teacher’s instruction. 49 This statement means that the teacher 45 Jo McDonough and Christopher Shaw, Materials and Methods in ELT …………, p. 204. 46 Jeremy Harmer, The Practice of English Language Teaching 4 th Edition, New York: Longman Publishing, 2009, p. 166 47 Jeremy Harmer, The Practice of English Language Teaching ……….…………., p. 166 48 Jeremy Harmer, The Practice of English Language Teaching ……………….…., p. 166 49 Jeremy Harmer, The Practice of English Language Teaching4 th Edition, New York: Longman Publishing, 2009, p. 166 cannot ask students to follow himher decision because students can make their decision by discussing their opinion with friends in group work. Finally, some students may choose their level of participation more readily than in a whole-class or pair work situation in order to avoid individual students becoming passive in groups. 50 It means that group work gives some students the freedom to choose their participation in order to elude passivity. From Harmer’s statement, it can be seen that group work may increase students’ opportunity to speak, increase students’ contribution in working with a group, develop students’ cooperation and negotiation, make their own decision, and then they may chose their level of participation. In addition, Brown stated that advantages of group work are: 51 1. Group work generates interactive language 2. Group work offers an embracing affective climate 3. Group work promotes learner responsibility and autonomy 4. Group work is a step toward individualizing instruction In sum up, group work has many advantages in developing students’ learning activity. First, it may help students to communicate and to share the ideas with others. Second, it may make the classroom becoming dynamic. Third, it may give the motivation, comfortable and enjoyment in learning. The last, it may develop social interaction and responsibility for themselves.

5. Disadvantages of Group Work

As a method, group work has disadvantages. According to Donough, the disadvantages of group work are; first, there is some concern that some students will probably not provide such as a good „language model’ as the teacher, so it required a more complex arrangement by the teacher as feedback and it need control to make the more talk active students do not dominate the quieter 50 Jeremy Harmer, The Practice of English Language Teaching4 th Edition, New York: Longman Publishing, 2009, p. 166. 51 H. Douglas Brown, Teaching by Principles: an Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy 2 nd Edition, San Francisco: Addison Wesley Longman, 2001, p. 177-179. students. 52 It means that the teacher has to control some students who are talk active and gives the opportunity to students who are quieter. Second, there are several possible to rearrange the classroom in order to increase a communicative environment. For example, rearrange the furniture in the classroom. But sometimes, other colleagues think negatively that an active class will increase noise level. 53 On the other hand, to make a communicative environment, the teacher should rearrange the classroom. It may be arrange the chairs by grouping. However an active class is identical with a noise class. Third, some monolingual classes prefer use their mother tongue rather than use target language, particularly in discussing and sharing something. Therefore, using target language in the classroom may initially be perceived as artificial. 54 It means that the teacher and students do not use the target language in the classroom. Then, target language is only used as artificial. Next, learners often have strong preferences. Consequently, teacher control and direct input material are low. 55 This statement means that students have preferences that can make them difficult to get the material directly. After that, if the class is divided into smaller unit, there may be problems that students do not want to work with those of their peers assigned by the teacher to the same group. 56 It means that group work has some problems, one of those problems is students do not like to work with some friends in the same group. Finally, in conducting group work, the problems commonly heard are class arrangement and class size. It is all very well if you have only a small, multilingual class of co-operative adults working in a comfortable, modern environment, but it will be difficult with a class of forty. 57 It seems that group work will be easy if it is conducted in the small class, because if it is conducted in 52 Jo McDonough and Christopher Shaw, Materials and Methods in ELT: Second Edition A Teacher’s Guide, Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 2003, p. 204. 53 Jo McDonough and Christopher Shaw, Materials and Methods in ELT….., p. 204-205. 54 Jo McDonough and Christopher Shaw, Materials and Methods in ELT……...…, p. 205. 55 Jo McDonough and Christopher Shaw, Materials and Methods in ELT……...…, p. 205. 56 Jo McDonough and Christopher Shaw, Materials and Methods in ELT…...……, p. 205. 57 Jo McDonough and Christopher Shaw, Materials and Methods in ELT…...……, p. 205. the big class, it may have some problems, for example, the arrangement of classroom is not suitable for group work activity. Based on the explanation above, the writer concludes that disadvantages of group work are students cannot be a good language model as a teacher, the teacher cannot control all students, the class become noisy, students use their mother language to communicate with their friends, some students do not contribute in doing a task, and the teacher will be difficult to arrange a big size class that consist of forty students. Meanwhile, based on Harmer disadvantages of group work; first, the class is likely to be noisy. Then, some teachers may lose control and feel hard to build the whole class but it is easy to dissipate and spill into smaller entities. 58 It means that the class of group work may become noisy because the teacher may not control all students. Second, not all students enjoy it because they would prefer listen to the teacher’s explanation rather than work in group with their peers. Sometimes, students feel themselves in unsuitable groups and wish moving to the others group. 59 On the other word, some students do not like to work with group because they are not enjoying with it. Thus, they prefer like to pay attention on the teacher’s explanation rather than work in group. Next, some students are passive whereas others may dominate because individuals may fall into group roles that become fossilized. 60 This statement means that group wok may consist of some students who passive and the others who active. Finally, group work may take a long time to organize; beginning and ending group work activities, moreover where students move around the class that wastes time and becomes chaotic. 61 That is why group work may make the class 58 Jeremy Harmer, The Practice of English Language Teaching 4 th Edition, New York: Longman Publishing, 2009, p. 166 59 Jeremy Harmer, The Practice of English Language Teaching ……………….., p. 166. 60 Jeremy Harmer, The Practice of English Language Teaching ………….……., p. 166. 61 Jeremy Harmer, The Practice of English Language Teaching …………….…., p. 166.

Dokumen yang terkait

DEVELOPING THE STUDENTS ABILITY IN READING COMPREHENSION THROUGH COMPERATIVE LEARNING OF THE FIRST YEAR STUDENTS AT SLTP NEGERI I LUMAJANG IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 1999/2000

1 4 40

Improvingstudents’ Reading Comprehension Of Narrative Text Through Jigsaw Technique (A Classroomaction Researchin The Second Grade Students Of Smp Ash-Sholihin Kebon Jeruk)

0 11 99

Improving the students’ Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text through Story Mapping

3 28 105

The Effectiveness of Using CIRC Technique to improve Students’ Reading Comprehension on Recount Text(Pre Experimental Study at Second Year Students of MTsN Rajeg)

0 4 113

Improving student's reading comprehention of narrative text through story mapping (a classroom action research at eight grade students of SMP PGRI 2 Ciputat)

0 17 0

The Effectiveness Of Using Collaborative Strategic Reading (Csr) On Students' Reading Comprehension Of Narrative Text" (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the First Grade ofSMA Mathia 'ul Huda Parung PanjangBogor in Academic Year of 201412015),

4 36 111

EMPLOYING QUESTION – ANSWER RELATIONSHIPS (QAR) STRATEGY TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION (A Classroom Action Research at the Eleventh Year Students of SMA Negeri 1 Rangkasbitung in 2012/2013 Academic Year)

5 22 256

Improving Students' Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text through Group Work Technique (A Classroom Action Research at the Eight Grade of SMPN 13 Tangerang Selatan)

0 3 98

The Effect of Video Game towards Students' Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text; (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the Eighth Grade Students' of SMP Negeri 96 Jakarta in the Academic Year of 2015/2016)

1 28 129

ENHANCING THE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION OF DESCRIPTIVE TEXT BY USING QUANTUM READING AT THE STUDENTS OF CLASS VIII G OF MTs N 1 KUDUS IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR 20132014 (A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH) SKRIPSI

0 0 21