Language Features of Descriptive Text Table 2.1

Meanwhile, Ur said that group work is a learning task through small-group interaction that is performed by learner to become more active in oral fluency because students in group get opportunities to talk in class. 33 Group work can make students learn actively because they have chance to talk in the classroom. In addition, Hess explained that: Group work is obviously a key element as it enables students to learn from one another. When working in small groups, students have a greater chance to practice oral fluency. Students are also far less intimidated in a small group, and once they become familiar with the procedure, they usually enjoy sharing ideas and practicing new language structure in this format. 34 Based on the definition, group work is viewed as a technique that gives students some chances to practice oral fluency, share idea with friends, and practice the new language. In sum up, group work is one of the techniques that consist of two or more students in a group who are given the same task to finish well. Then, students cooperate to study and share their ideas in group work. They may also help and guide each other. Again, they can interpret the reading text cooperatively.

2. Purposes of Group Work

There are some purposes of group work. According to Bormann, “The primary purpose of much of the talk in a group discussion must be to communicate.” 35 It means that communication is the main purpose of group work. It is in line with Brown in his book Teaching by Principles: an Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy, stated that one of the major purpose of group 33 Penny Ur, A Course in Language Teaching: Practice and Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, p. 232. 34 Natalie Hess, Teaching Large Multilevel Classes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001, p. 112 35 Ernest G. Bormann, Discussion and Group Methods, New York: Harper Row Publisher, 1969, p. 4. work is giving more opportunities to speak for students. 36 In other words, group work can increase students’ ability in speaking. In addition, group work gives the opportunities for student to: 37 1. Generate more ideas and be exposed to different point of view 2. Develop tolerance for ambiguity 3. Experience incidental and planned opportunities that use language as a tool for learning 4. Learn from and teach one another in a supportive environment 5. Ask their own questions so that they own their learning and have better retention 6. Make use of exploratory talk; offer possible suggestion and tentative ideas 7. Realize the fact that their talk helps them to understand better 8. Gain confidence while learning as a result of peer support and encouragement 9. Acquire higher – level thinking skills for example, to speculate, hypothesize, and generalize because of the potential for what if question to occur 10. Develop short – and long – term recall of information 11. Experience genuine intellectual inquiry that cultivates moral and intellectual autonomy 12. Value their thinking and experiences during the learning process 13. Become more responsibly for their own learning and the learning of others 14. See how others learn and how they themselves learn 15. Have shared experiences that become the basis for learning 16. Present what they know and reflect on how they learned it i.e., develop metacognitive knowledge 17. Build on what they know already with increased motivation in order to get more information that makes use of critical thinking skills 18. Develop problem solving strategies 19. Attain better academic achievement 20. Learn in a context compatible to their culture 21. Develop emphatic perspective as a result of working together 22. Learn how to work together i.e., acquire social skills 23. Develop a liking for self and others Based on the statements above, group work is useful for students because they may share their ideas and experience in a group, develop their social 36 H. Douglas Brown, Teaching by Principles: an Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy 2 nd Edition, San Francisco: Addison Wesley Longman, 2001, p. 177 37 Carolyn Kessler, Cooperative Language Learning: a Teacher’s Resource Book, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall Regents, 1992, p. 59-60.

Dokumen yang terkait

DEVELOPING THE STUDENTS ABILITY IN READING COMPREHENSION THROUGH COMPERATIVE LEARNING OF THE FIRST YEAR STUDENTS AT SLTP NEGERI I LUMAJANG IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 1999/2000

1 4 40

Improvingstudents’ Reading Comprehension Of Narrative Text Through Jigsaw Technique (A Classroomaction Researchin The Second Grade Students Of Smp Ash-Sholihin Kebon Jeruk)

0 11 99

Improving the students’ Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text through Story Mapping

3 28 105

The Effectiveness of Using CIRC Technique to improve Students’ Reading Comprehension on Recount Text(Pre Experimental Study at Second Year Students of MTsN Rajeg)

0 4 113

Improving student's reading comprehention of narrative text through story mapping (a classroom action research at eight grade students of SMP PGRI 2 Ciputat)

0 17 0

The Effectiveness Of Using Collaborative Strategic Reading (Csr) On Students' Reading Comprehension Of Narrative Text" (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the First Grade ofSMA Mathia 'ul Huda Parung PanjangBogor in Academic Year of 201412015),

4 36 111

EMPLOYING QUESTION – ANSWER RELATIONSHIPS (QAR) STRATEGY TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION (A Classroom Action Research at the Eleventh Year Students of SMA Negeri 1 Rangkasbitung in 2012/2013 Academic Year)

5 22 256

Improving Students' Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text through Group Work Technique (A Classroom Action Research at the Eight Grade of SMPN 13 Tangerang Selatan)

0 3 98

The Effect of Video Game towards Students' Reading Comprehension of Narrative Text; (A Quasi-Experimental Study at the Eighth Grade Students' of SMP Negeri 96 Jakarta in the Academic Year of 2015/2016)

1 28 129

ENHANCING THE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION OF DESCRIPTIVE TEXT BY USING QUANTUM READING AT THE STUDENTS OF CLASS VIII G OF MTs N 1 KUDUS IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR 20132014 (A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH) SKRIPSI

0 0 21