85
technique. The results of the normality test will be represented in the following table.
Table 3.13. The Apperance of the Table of Normality Test Blank
Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnov
a
Shapiro-Wilk Statistic
df Sig.
Statistic df
Sig. Pre-test
Post-test . This is a lower bound of the true significance.
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
After paired samples test was analyzed, the results were interpreted. The interpretation of the results started from looking at the value in the column of
confidence value and sig. 2-tailed. The confidence value chosen should be 95. If the value in sig. 2-tailed is less than 0.05, it means that H
is rejected. In other words, it means that there is significant difference between the scores in pre-test
and post-test. The following is the appearance of the blank table of paired sample test table.
Table 3.14. The Apperance of the Table of Paired Sample Test Blank
Paired Samples Test
Paired Differences t
df Sig. 2-
tailed Mea
n Std.
Deviati on
Std. Error
Mean 95 Confidence
Interval of the Difference
Lower Upper
86
To sum up the explanation above, the following figure represents the systematic structure of the data gathering technique, data gathering instrument,
and data analysis technique of the research.
Figure 3.10. Data Gathering Technique, Instruments, and Data Analysis Technique of the Research
.
Pai r 1
Pre-test –
Post-test
87
CHAPTER IV DATA ANALYSIS RESULTS
This chapter contains three parts. The first part discusses the steps of the development of the designed materials as to answer the first research questions.
The second part contains the answer of the second research question which is about the presentation of the development product. The third part discusses the
acceptability of the development product as the result of the third research question.
A. The Steps of the Development of the Designed Materials
This section consists of three parts taken from Borg and Gall’s 1983 Educational Research and Development. As the first part, there is research and
information collecting. The second part is about planning the materials. The third part discusses preliminary form of product.
1. Research and Information Collecting
In research and information collecting, there were three data gathering techniques to gather data, which were observation, interview, and survey. Firstly,
the observation was done in wedding expo that were held by particular organization at Jogja City Mall on August 13 and November 13, 2016. The results
of attending these two events of wedding expo were a lot of wedding brochures which were given freely by wedding vendors or organizers in the wedding expo.
88
Moreover, the wedding brochures would be used as guidelines to design the materials, as well as used as learning source and media.
Secondly, the stakeholders from six different wedding organizers were interviewed due to their knowledge in both organizing and leading a team, as well
as the importance of English in dealing with foreign clients. Thirdly, questionnaires were distributed to five wedding organizers. As the result, there
were only 21 questionnaires filled by the members of the wedding organizers. This test was conducted in one team of wedding organizer, as the major subject of
this research. For displaying further results of these three data gathering technique, this section is divided into three parts. They are instructional problems,
learner characteristics, and the guidelines for materials design.
a. Instructional Problems
In determining the problems in this research, the seven stakeholders from seven different wedding organizers or hotelsresorts were interviewed. These
seven stakeholders consisted of six stakeholders from six wedding organizers based in Yogyakarta and one professional stakeholder from an outstanding resort
based in Bali. Firstly, the purpose of interviewing six stakeholders of the wedding organizers was to generalize the knowledge of wedding organization in
Yogyakarta, as well as the importance of English in wedding organization, particularly when communicating with foreign clients.
Moreover, those six stakeholders were from Tembi Rumah Budaya interviewed on July 21, 2016, CV Sekar Sitinggil interviewed on August 9,
2015, Callalily Wedding Organizer interviewed on August 10, 2016, Kusuma PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
