Students The Presentation of the Development Product

134 Furthermore, the second evaluator gave more detail evaluation related to the layout and design of the designed materials which is represented in the following interview part. The layout so far so good. I think, my last comment on the layout, e, I think I didn’t give much critics and also suggestions because it has been already good. And I think, in terms of face validity and also when I looked at the design, I think, it’s already appropriate and I can, related to the font of the text, it’s okay, and it’s consistent. And also, it’s not too big and also not to small, and it’s appropriate. And also, related to the pictures, the pictures are already good. I mean, the resolutions of the pictures are already good. So I can see clearly the pictures and also what happens in the picture. But, related to the pictures, I think you should, e, give information about the source of the pictures. Because I think, you do not take the pictures by yourself. I mean, you take the pictures from..you browse it from the Internet, you download it from the Internet, and then you attach it in your material design. And then I think, to avoid plagiarims, you should add the references of the source of the pictures. J Ie 2; page 267 In giving positive evaluation toward the design and layout, the second evaluator suggested to add the resource of the pictures used in the materials. Furthermore, another positive evaluation of the design and layout was delivered also by the third evaluator. OK. First of all, the layout, I think the layout is very good and interesting enough. And then, the layout also readable for the students and also for the teachers and also for the others, maybe. And then the materials inside the design is very good. It has connection with wedding organizer and then it can improve students’ knowledge even the students who do not know English at all, they can understand the materials well. K Ie 2; page 269 The last claim to judge the appropriateness of the design and layout was also delivered by the forth evaluator. It can be seen from the following interview part. PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI 135 The materials are considered appropriately design in terms of their layouts. It is colorful and it makes the readers interested to enjoy the contents. L Ie 2; page 270 By looking at the discussion above, it can be concluded that the designed materials have had been already good in terms of design and layout. Furthremore, several parts need to be revised to support the face validity. One way was adding the resource of the pictures used. b Theme 2: The activities are various and good. The learning activities which are provided in the designed materials were claimed to have alread been various and good. The first evaluator, in the interview section, said that the activities were quite various but need some other scaffolding activities. Quite various. But I still find one or two activities that need to be scaffolded more. I have written it in the field notes. So far, the activities..what is it..suit students’needs and goals. I Ie 4 – Ie 5; page 266 Furthermore, the second evaluator claimed that the learning activities were already good. The learning activities seemed already to have certain standards. It can be seen from the following interview part. The activities are already good. Because I think from the last design that you showed to me, the last design was very difficult. But now, I can see that, yeah, I think the level of the materials between one unit to another unit is already good. It seems that you have certain standards coughing sorry, you have certain standard related to your every unit in the materials design and you use that kind of standard to design other units. And that’s good. J Ie 4; page 267 The same positive evaluation related to learning activities was delivered by the third evaluator. She comended also the existence of grammar points which can be seen from the following interview part.