b,c b,c b b,c,d

Iteration History

a,b,c

Iteration -2 Log likelihood Coefficients Constant Step 0 1 325.240 -.504 2 325.233 -.515 3 325.233 -.515 a. Constant is included in the model. b. Initial -2 Log Likelihood: 325.233 c. Estimation terminated at iteration number 3 because parameter estimates changed by less than .001. Classification Table

a,b

Observed Predicted PL Percentage Correct 1 Step 0 PL 154 100.0 1 92 .0 Overall Percentage 62.6 a. Constant is included in the model. b. The cut value is .500 Variables in the Equation B S.E. Wald df Sig. ExpB Step 0 Constant -.515 .132 15.285 1 .000 .597 Variables not in the Equation Score df Sig. Step 0 Variables OA 1.744 1 .187 ARL 12.024 1 .001 Overall Statistics 12.745 2 .002 Block 1: Method = Enter Iteration History

a,b,c,d

Iteration -2 Log likelihood Coefficients Constant OA ARL Step 1 1 312.207 .371 .196 -.024 2 311.909 .420 .235 -.028 3 311.909 .420 .237 -.028 4 311.909 .420 .237 -.028 a. Method: Enter b. Constant is included in the model. c. Initial -2 Log Likelihood: 325.233 d. Estimation terminated at iteration number 4 because parameter estimates changed by less than .001. Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients Chi-square df Sig. Step 1 Step 13.324 2 .001 Block 13.324 2 .001 Model 13.324 2 .001 Model Summary Step -2 Log likelihood Cox Snell R Square Nagelkerke R Square 1 311.909 a .053 .072 a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 4 because parameter estimates changed by less than .001. Hosmer and Lemeshow Test Step Chi-square df Sig. 1 6.935 8 .544 Contingency Table for Hosmer and Lemeshow Test PL = .00 PL = 1.00 Total Observed Expected Observed Expected Step 1 1 24 21.845 4 6.155 28 2 17 19.263 10 7.737 27 3 15 17.255 10 7.745 25 4 17 16.265 7 7.735 24 5 17 16.482 8 8.518 25 6 18 15.911 7 9.089 25 7 16 15.631 10 10.369 26 8 14 13.193 10 10.807 24 9 8 11.826 17 13.174 25 10 8 6.330 9 10.670 17 Classification Table a Observed Predicted PL Percentage 1 Correct Step 1 PL 139 15 90.3 1 71 21 22.8 Overall Percentage 65.0 a. The cut value is .500 Variables in the Equation B S.E. Wald df Sig. ExpB Step 1 a OA .237 .262 .821 1 .365 1.267 ARL -.028 .009 10.606 1 .001 .972 Constant .420 1.420 .087 1 .767 1.522 a. Variables entered on step 1: OA, ARL. Correlation Matrix Constant OA ARL Step 1 Constant 1.000 -.896 -.511 OA -.896 1.000 .088 ARL -.511 .088 1.000 Step number: 1 Observed Groups and Predicted Probabilities 32 ┼ ┼ │ │ │ │ F │ │ R 24 ┼ ┼ E │ 11 │ Q │ 11 │ U │ 11 │ E 16 ┼ 10 1 ┼ N │ 101 1 1 │ C │ 1 00111 0 │ Y │ 0 0000110 1 1 │ 8 ┼ 0 0 0000100 1 1 1 1 1 ┼ │ 0 10 0 0000000 0 0 0 1 1 1 │ │ 0 001010000000 010 0 10 111 0 01 1 1 │ │ 1 000 0000 000000000000000000001000001 10 00010 10 10 0 1 │ Predicted ─────────┼─────────┼─────────┼─────────┼─────────┼─────────┼─────────┼────── ───┼─────────┼────────── Prob: 0 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 1 Group: 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000011111111111111111111111111 111111111111111111111111 Predicted Probability is of Membership for 1.00 The Cut Value is .50 Symbols: 0 - .00 1 - 1.00 Each Symbol Represents 2 Cases. Casewise List b Case Selected Status a Observed Predicted Predicted Group Temporary Variable PL Resid ZResid 91 S 1 .057 .943 4.056 a. S = Selected, U = Unselected cases, and = Misclassified cases. b. Cases with studentized residuals greater than 2.000 are listed. LAMPIRAN 8 REGRESI LOGISTIK MODERATING Case Processing Summary Unweighted Cases a N Percent Selected Cases Included in Analysis 246 100.0 Missing Cases .0 Total 246 100.0 Unselected Cases .0 Total 246 100.0 a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases. Dependent Variable Encoding Original Value Internal Value 1 1 Block 0: Beginning Block Iteration History

a,b,c

Iteration -2 Log likelihood Coefficients Constant Step 0 1 325.240 -.504 2 325.233 -.515 3 325.233 -.515 a. Constant is included in the model. b. Initial -2 Log Likelihood: 325.233 c. Estimation terminated at iteration number 3 because parameter estimates changed by less than .001. Classification Table

a,b

Observed Predicted PL Percentage Correct 1 Step 0 PL 154 100.0 1 92 .0 Overall Percentage 62.6 a. Constant is included in the model. b. The cut value is .500 Variables in the Equation B S.E. Wald df Sig. ExpB Step 0 Constant -.515 .132 15.285 1 .000 .597 Variables not in the Equation Score df Sig. Step 0 Variables OA 1.744 1 .187 ARL 12.024 1 .001 KAP 11.619 1 .001 X1X3 12.632 1 .000 X2X3 6.966 1 .008 Overall Statistics 21.099 5 .001

Dokumen yang terkait

Pengaruh Audit Report Lag dan Opini Audit terhadap Ketepatan Waktu Penyampaian Laporan Keuangan dengan Reputasi KAP sebagai Variabel Moderating

14 108 120

Analisis Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan, Ukuran Kap Dan Jenis Opini Audit Terhadap Audit Report Lag Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia

1 79 94

Pengaruh Auditor Switching, Opini Audit, Profitabilitas, Reputasi KAP, dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Audit Timeliness dengan Audit Report Lag sebagai Variabel Intervening. (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Pertambangan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia

12 46 133

Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Solvabilitas, Opini Audit dan Reputasi KAP terhadap audit delay dengan Size Perusahaan sebagai variabel moderating pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2011-2014

2 17 126

Pengaruh Audit Report Lag dan Opini Audit terhadap Ketepatan Waktu Penyampaian Laporan Keuangan dengan Reputasi KAP sebagai Variabel Moderating

0 0 29

BAB II TINJAUAN PUSTAKA A. Tinjauan Teoritis 1. Teori Kepatuhan (compliance theory) - Pengaruh Audit Report Lag dan Opini Audit terhadap Ketepatan Waktu Penyampaian Laporan Keuangan dengan Reputasi KAP sebagai Variabel Moderating

0 0 29

BAB I PENDAHULUAN A. Latar Belakang Masalah - Pengaruh Audit Report Lag dan Opini Audit terhadap Ketepatan Waktu Penyampaian Laporan Keuangan dengan Reputasi KAP sebagai Variabel Moderating

0 1 8

SKRIPSI PENGARUH AUDIT REPORT LAG DAN OPINI AUDIT TERHADAP KETEPATAN WAKTU PENYAMPAIAN LAPORAN KEUANGAN DENGAN REPUTASI KAP SEBAGAI VARIABEL MODERATING PADA PERUSAHAAN MANUFAKTUR YANG TERDAFTAR DI BEI

0 1 12

PENGARUH PREDIKSI KEBANGKRUTAN DAN OPINI AUDITOR TERHADAP AUDIT DELAY DENGAN REPUTASI KAP SEBAGAI VARIABEL MODERASI PADA PERUSAHAAN MANUFAKTUR YANG TERDAFTAR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA

0 0 17

PENGARUH PROFITABILITAS TERHADAP KETEPATAN WAKTU PENYAMPAIAN LAPORAN KEUANGAN DENGAN OPINI AUDIT DAN REPUTASI KANTOR AKUNTAN PUBLIK SEBAGAI VARIABEL MODERATING( PADA PERUSAHAAN MANUFAKTUR DI BURSA EFEK

0 1 14