Key considerations 2638 Understanding an organization’s profile 2646 Analyzing the boundaries and context of social responsibility

62 © ISO 2007 - all rights reserved its vision, policy and strategy, as well as its relationship with stakeholders and its daily practices. To make 2633 progress and allow for accountability, an organization should review and communicate its activities and 2634 progress. All these activities are interdependent. This standard is intended to be compatible with and 2635 should be integrated into an organization’s existing models, strategies and practices. 2636

7.2 Understanding the context of social responsibility 2637

7.2.1 Key considerations 2638

An organization needs specific information and analysis to develop its vision, mission, strategies, objectives 2639 and targets to integrate social responsibility into its activities, goods and services. This information 2640 gathering and analysis is best done in a way that enables an organization to understand the social, 2641 environmental and economic context in which it operates. Key components of this effort may include 2642 understanding an organization’s profile, analyzing the boundaries and context of its social responsibility and 2643 understanding its stakeholders’ concerns, particularly with respect to its core issues concerning social 2644 responsibility see Clause 6. 2645

7.2.2 Understanding an organization’s profile 2646

Before an organization begins establishing and implementing an approach for addressing issues of social 2647 responsibility, it should collect and evaluate specific information to better understand its current profile. This 2648 information may include: 2649  Key goods and services, locationsgeographic scope and organizational structure of operations, 2650 governance structure, workforce make-up, annual income and expenses and other quantitative 2651 information; 2652  The degree to which an organization’s activities and practices conform to identified internal and 2653 external requirements through for example, reviewing litigation records, audit trends, regulatory 2654 enforcement records, adopted codes or other records; 2655  Key goals and recent performance in achieving those goals; 2656  Recent and anticipated major changes in goods, services, activities, strategies or policies; 2657  Projections of the current and likely future trends in the field of work or sector; and 2658  Key strengths and competencies including human and other resource needs. 2659

7.2.3 Analyzing the boundaries and context of social responsibility

2660 An organization should identify and analyze the issues of social responsibility material to it and its 2661 stakeholders and evaluate the context for those issues see Clause 6. This may involve assessing the 2662 boundaries of social responsibility within an organization and its supply chain [upstream, downstream and 2663 sideways] and within its stakeholder network. These will help identify the issues of social responsibility that 2664 may be prioritized for action. Within its boundaries of social responsibility, an organization should take 2665 responsibility based on laws, conventions andor ethics. In addition, within its sphere of influence, an 2666 organization should seek to affect the socially responsible actions of other organizations. Outside its sphere 2667 of influence, an organization is less likely to be held accountable by stakeholders. 2668 This boundary assessment can identify the issues of social responsibility that may have an actual or 2669 potential significant [material] impact or be controlled or affected by an organization’s own activities, goods 2670 and services. It also can identify entities within the supply chain and stakeholder network [stakeholder map] 2671 that an organization can control or reasonably influence, that is, those within its sphere of influence. It can 2672 identify the actual or potential significant [material] impacts of social responsibility that may be generated by 2673 © ISO 2007 - all rights reserved 63 those organizations. Within the supply chain, degrees of control and impact may be related to the size, 2674 complexity and types of organizations in the supply chain, as well as an organization’s competitive situation 2675 and the number of organizations within the supply chain. 2676 The evaluation of information on the context can include: 2677  Understanding the trends concerning the significant [material] issues of social responsibility; 2678  Identifying what actions have already been taken and progress made by an organization and 2679 its supply chain in addressing the significant [material] issues of social responsibility; 2680  Identifying progress on any existing goals of social responsibility; and 2681  Analyzing the potential opportunities, risks and challenges posed by the significant [material] 2682 issues of social responsibility over the short and long term. 2683 Several questions can be helpful in evaluating the context: 2684  Which operational activities are contravening international laws, treaties, protocols or conventions? 2685  Which processes, procedures, activities, actions or existing socially responsible activities of an 2686 organization are not in keeping with, or even in conflict with, an organization’s strategy and objectives 2687 for social responsibility? 2688  Which elements of an organization’s culture for example, operational values, norms, basic beliefs and 2689 convictions, are contributing to the realization of the strategy and commitment for social responsibility? 2690 Conversely, which of these are not contributing and need to be changed? 2691

7.2.4 Understanding stakeholder concerns 2692