The students could directly answer or give opinion without any command from the writer.
The writer also could handle the probelm by creating a fun learning
activities for the students in understanding about conditional sentence type III.
There was an improvement from the first cyle into the second cycle. The
category changed into Good and Very Good.
4. Finding after Implementing the Action
The data of this research after implementing the Classroom Action Research were from two sources, there are post-questionnaire, and post-
test.
a Questionnaire
The questionnaire was taken after impelementing the last session of learning activities on Thursday, 13
th
October 2016. It was started from 13.45 - 14.00 p.m. The explanation of the questionnaire result will be
explained below : 1.
The students felt enthusiastic and not bored after learning conditional sentence type III through interactive technique.
The result of the questionnaire showed that 13 students were absolutely agree with it and also 16 students agree that they felt enthusiastic and not
bored after the interactive technique was implemented The total of index in likert scale was 81. It could be summarized that they were absolutely
agree that they did not feel bored in learning conditional sentence type III. 2.
The students became more communicative after using the interactive technique.
The writer concluded that the students were communicative during the learning process because based on the result there were 14 students who
totally agree abut it, whereas 15 students also agree. The total index of the likert scale was 82. It could be concluded that they were absolutely
agree that they could be more communicative in using conditional sentence type III.
3. After learning conditional sentence type III through Interactive Technique,
The students felt more automatically in producing the sentence. There were 23 students who were agree and 9 students were strongly
agree with this statement that they could use it more automatically, it was supported with the result of 81 of index. It means that they were
absolutely agree with it. 4.
Interactive Technique did not attract the students to be enthusiastic. Based on the result of the questionnaire, 17 students were disagree on
that, and 6 students were totally disagree about it. The total percentage of the likert scale showed about 28. It could be concluded that they did not
agree. On the contrary the students felt more enthusiastic and happy when they learn conditional sentence type III through interactive technique.
5. The students could directly know spontaneously about the mistake which
happened when they learned about conditional sentence type III through interactive technique.
Based on the result, the pecentage was 66. 12 students agree about it and 5 students were strongly agree. It stilll could be concluded that they
agreed that they could realize or notice the mistake which happened spontaneously.
6. The students did not felt confident in using conditional sentence type III or
in delivering the sentence. The result of the questionnaire was 25. 21 students were disagree and
10 students were absolutely disagree about it. It means that the students did not agree with that statement. On the contrary, the students were felt
enjoy and confident in producing the third type of conditional sentence. 7.
The culture connection related to the students‟ fluency in producing the third type conditional sentence.
11 students agreed that the cultural content of someone influenced the way people producing or using the conditional sentence. Then, 6 students were
strongly agree about it. 10 students still doubted it. 8 students were disagree and 4 students were strongly disagree about it. The total result
of the likert scale was 63. It could be concluded that the students agreed that it also brought the influence for them.
8. It was so difficult in understanding the third type of conditional sentence
through interactive technique. 5 students agreed if interactive grammar was difficult to be understood,
but the rest did not agree with that statement. 19 students showed that they really disagree about it.The result of the likert scale in this questionnaire
was 29. It means that the students could be categorized that they did not agree with that statement. On the contrary, it helped the students in
learning about conditional sentence. 9.
Interactive Technique did not attract the students in learning about the third type of conditional sentence.
18 Students showed that they were really disagree that interactive technique did not attract them in learning about conditional sentence in
type III, there was only 2 students who agreed about it. The result showed that the total percentage for this statement was 36 . It could be
categorized that the students did not agree with that statement. This technique made them felt curious to know about the material of the lesson.
10. Your teacher gave a chance for the students to explore during the lesson,
including to produce the sentence by themselves. 24 Students were agree that the teacher gave a chance for them to explore
the material, whereas 11 students were absolutely agree about it. Then there were no students who disagree with that statement. The result of the
likert scale was 83. It could be concluded that the students agreed that the writer gave a chance for the students to explored and found the answer
by themselves. 11.
The questions from the writer, attracted the students to join to the learning activites and made the students want to take part in the learning process.
21 Students were agree that the questions attracted them to join in the learning activity, whereas 8 students were strongly agree with that
statement. The students agreed that the leading questions from the writer made them want to involve more in the learning process. It was supported
by the result of the questionnaire 79. It could be categorized that the students agreed.
12. The writer‟s questions made the students became more understood about
the material of the lesson, the questions guide the students to find the answer easily.
23 Students were agree that the writer‟s question that was delivered in the classroom made them more understood about the lesson, then 11 students
were absolutely really agree with that statement. Based on the result of the questionnaire was 83. From the likert scale, it could be concluded that
the students were absolutely agree that the writer‟s question could made them comprehend the material of the lesson easily.
13. The writer prepared various interesting media for the learning activities.
21 Students were agree that the writer had already prepared some various interesting media, and 16 students were strongly agree about it. It was
supported by the likert scale result of 87, From that result, the students felt happy and enjoy when they learned grammar, especially about
conditional sentence. 14.
The writer did not provide a lot of examples of conditional sentence type III during the learning process happened.
19 Students showed that they were disagree if the writer did not provide a lot of examples during the learning process. Whereas, 15 students showed
that they were absolutely disagree about it. Based on the result of the likert scale in this questionnaire was 23, it could be concluded that the
students did not agree with it. The students could learn by themselves through alot of examples that was provided by the writer.
15. Pictures were presented in the classroom for the learning activities.
21 Students agreed that pictures were presented during the learning activities, whereas 16 students were really strongly agree about it. The
students‟ response were veryn positive, because they agreed that the pictures were presented in front of the class. It was supported from the
result of questionnaire of 87. It could be concluded that the students were strongly agree with this statement.
16. The writer taught the material of conditional sentence type III through a
song. 24 Students agreed that the writer also provided a song for the learning
activty in conditional sentence type III and 15 students were strongly agree that song was provided in the classroom. Based on the result from
the questionnaire, the result was 87. It could be concluded that the students were absolutely agree that the learning activity of conditional
sentence also presented through a song. 17.
The writer gave the printed material about the theory of conditional sentence for each type to the students.
12 Students were agree that they got a printed material, and 26 students showed that they really agreed about it. The students showed that they
agreed that they got a printed material for them to remind and strengten their knowledge about conditional sentence. It was supported with the
result of the likert scale in this questionnaire, the percentage was 93. It could be concluded that they were strongly agree with that statement.
18. The students felt that the various media which were presented in the class
made the learning activities became more interesting and attracted them. There were only 2 students who disagreed that the learning activities were
more interesting. On the contrary there were 21 students who were agree that the learning activities became more interesting, and 13 students were
absolutely agreed about it. Based on the result of the questionnaire, the percentage was 83. It could be categorized that the students were
strongly agree that it attracted them in learning conditional sentence and did not make them felt bored.
19. Interactive technique did not make the students understand in using
conditional sentence type III. There were 3 students who were agree with that statement, whereas 15
students were disagreed and 17 students were strongly disagree about it. On the contrary it made them comprehend well and improve their ability
in using conditional sentence type III. It could be seen from the result of the questionnaire. The percentage was 24. It could be concluded that the
students disagreed with that statement. 20.
Interactive technique helped the students in understanding the function and meaning of conditional sentence, especially in the third type of conditional
sentence. There were only 3 students who were disagree with that statement, on the
contrary 18 students agreed that interactive technique helped them in understanding the function and meaning of the third conditional sentence.
Then, 15 students were absolutely agree that it really helped them. The result of the questionnaire was 83. It showed that the students were
strongly agree that they could use the third conditional sentence well. They also could diffentiate about the function of the third conditional
sentence, together with the meaning of the sentence.
b The Result of Post-Test
Post-test was taken at the end of every cycle. It was applied in order to know a
bout the students‟ improvement in using conditional sentence type III. The test consisted of 20 questions in multiple choice.
Before the post-test was given to the students, the writer had done a trustworthiness of the test using discriminating power and difficulty item.
At the first, the test contained 30 questions for each test, after the writer analyzed the validity, the writer eliminated 30 questions into 20 questions.
In order to support the result of the post-test, the writer listed the students who got below the minimum mastery criterion KKM, average,
and high from the pre-test, post-test 1, and post-test 2. The following table will be explained further :
Table 4.3 The Result of Students’ Score
Minimum Mastery Criterion Score 75 Below ≤ 75
Average 75 -80 High 80 Mean
Pre-Test 30
8 1
59,74
Post Test 1
17 14
8 74,87
Post Test 2 -
16 23
86,15
Bar Chart 4.1 The Result of Students’ Mean Score
10 20
30 40
50 60
70 80
90 100
Pre-test Post-Test 1
Post-Test 2 Series2
Series1
B. Analysis of the Data
In analyzing the comparison between the pre-test, post-test 1, and post-test 2 of each cycle, the writer used the calculation of the mean score
of the class, class percentage who passed KKM, and percentage of students‟ improvement score from pre-test, post-test 1, and post-test 2.
In order to get the mean score in the pre-test. The writer used the formula of :
Pre-test
Σx = 2330 n = 39
X = = 59,74
From the calculation above, it could be concluded that the result of pre-test before implementing an interactive technique in the classroom
action reseacrh was 59,74. The score was still under the KKM, it could be categorized that the result was still low.
The writer also calculated the percentage of the students who passed KKM 75. The writer used the formula of :
P = x 100
It was known that : F = 9 Students who have passed KKM
N= 39 Amount of the respondent
P= x 100 = 23,07
From the calculation above, it could be concluded that the students who have passed KKM was only 23,07 . There were only 9 students
who have passed in KKM 75. Then, the rest, there were 30 students who did not pass KKM.
