Need analysis interview guideline

E. RESEARCH DATA ANALYSIS

This research applied both qualitative and quantitative methods to collect the data. The analysis of the collected data and information is used to develop the materials and to identify the appropriateness of the developed materials as instructional materials for EFH program.

1. The qualitative data

The qualitative data were obtained through interviews, open-ended questionnaires, and observations including photographs and video recording. The results of the data were in the form of descriptions about the effectiveness of developed materials for L1 class of EFH. The data were collected by interviewing parents, children and teacher of L1A class of EFH 2013 and some other L1 teachers from FEC and EFH previous years. The open-ended questionnaire was distributed to parents of L1A class children. The interviews and questionnaires followed the guidelines that have been outlined in Validity section in this chapter. The collected data from the interview transcript and the result of the questionnaire were examined by assembling, coding, comparing and building meanings and interpretations to find the evaluation of the developed materials. The result of the data was used to develop, to measure and to revise the designed materials until they reached the ideal qualification of good materials for L1A children of EFH.

2. The quantitative data

The quantitative data was obtained from expert judgements’ questionnaire. To determine the reliability of the data, the researcher used Likert Scale in analyzing the data. The researcher used the scale to quantify the experts’ opinion through the questionnaires. The score of the data were formulated in the following key: 1 = Strongly Disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Neither Agree nor Disagree 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree Then, the collected data using Likert Scale were analyzed by calculating the percentage by using the formula below: Note: P= percentage of the item f= collected scores N= number of cases After calculating the percentage, the researcher transformed those percentages into criteria of feasibility. This result is very important to know whether the materials should be revised or not. The materials are called feasible to apply if they get score more than 60. However, it should be revised if the score less than 60. The criteria are outlined as the following table: P

Dokumen yang terkait

DEVELOPING ENGLISH SPEAKING MATERIALS FOR STUDENTS OF CULINARY STUDY PROGRAM THROUGH TASK-BASED LEARNING APPROACH.

1 6 25

Developing English learning materials based on direct method for the first level of junior program of Purikids Yogyakarta.

0 0 227

Developing English course materials for students of management.

0 0 252

DEVELOPING ENGLISH LEARNING MATERIALS FOR THE STUDENTS OF INFORMATICS ENGINEERING EDUCATION PROGRAM IN YOGYAKARTA STATE UNIVERSITY.

0 0 228

DEVELOPING ENGLISH LEARNING MATERIALS USING A THEME-BASED STORYBOOK FOR READING COMPREHENSION OF “WHEN ENGLISH RINGS A BELL” TEXTBOOK FOR GRADE VII OF SMP/MTs.

0 0 326

DEVELOPING ENGLISH READING LEARNING MATERIALS FOR INTERNATIONAL MATHEMATICS EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM OF YOGYAKARTA STATE UNIVERSITY.

0 0 341

DEVELOPING ENGLISH LEARNING MATERIALS FOR GRADE TEN STUDENTS OF VISUAL COMMUNICATION DESIGN PROGRAM OF SMK KOPERASI YOGYAKARTA BASED ON CURRICULUM 2013.

0 3 380

DEVELOPING ENGLISH SPEAKING MATERIALS FOR TUTORIAL PRACTICES OF INTERNATIONAL SCIENCE CLASSES OF YOGYAKARTA STATE UNIVERSITY.

0 0 434

DEVELOPING ENGLISH SPEAKING MATERIALS FOR ENGLISH TUTORIAL PROGRAM OF INTERMEDIATE LEVEL STUDENTS OF INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM AT THE CENTRE FOR LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT OF YOGYAKARTA STATE UNIVERSITY.

0 2 335

DEVELOPING APPROPRIATE ENGLISH SPEAKING LEARNING MATERIALS FOR ENGLISH TUTORIAL PROGRAM FOR THE STUDENTS OF INTERNATIONAL MATHEMATICS EDUCATION STUDY PROGRAM OF YOGYAKARTA STATE UNIVERSITY.

1 2 325